Re: Kernel 6.11 Test Week 2024-09-29 to 2024-10-05

2024-09-28 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 10:51 AM Zerotwo02 wrote: > Good day, are these tests only concerned with systems running Fedora 40 > and 39? Or is there any testing needed to be done by systems running on > Fedora 41? > Regards > Vaishnav R > > The testday iso is https://jforbes.fedorapeople.org/testwee

Re: Kernel 6.11 Test Week 2024-09-29 to 2024-10-05

2024-09-28 Thread Zerotwo02
Good day, are these tests only concerned with systems running Fedora 40 and 39? Or is there any testing needed to be done by systems running on Fedora 41? Regards Vaishnav R On Sun, 29 Sept 2024, 10:34 Sumantro Mukherjee, wrote: > Hey All, > > I would like to invite all of you to participate in

Kernel 6.11 Test Week 2024-09-29 to 2024-10-05

2024-09-28 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All, I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.11 Test week is happening from 2024-09-29 to 2024-10-05. It's fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your results. As usual, th

Fedora eln compose report: 20240929.n.0 changes

2024-09-28 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20240928.n.3 NEW: Fedora-eln-20240929.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Fedora eln compose report: 20240928.n.3 changes

2024-09-28 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20240927.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20240928.n.3 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 37 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 109.52 MiB Size of dropped packages:46.39 MiB

2024-09-30 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 41 Blocker Review Meeting

2024-09-28 Thread Adam Williamson
# F10 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2024-09-30 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 1 proposed blocker and 2 proposed freeze exception

Re: Package updates missing in Fedora 41 but present in Fedora 40

2024-09-28 Thread Peter Hanecak
Hello, On 9/28/24 12:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:12:20PM +0200, Peter Hanecak wrote: Hello, On 9/27/24 13:13, Fabio Valentini wrote: - tipcutils-0:3.0.6-1.fc40 > tipcutils-0:3.0.4-11.fc41 Package was updated to 3.0.6 on Rawhide, Fedora 40, 39, and EPEL 9

Fedora 41 compose report: 20240928.n.0 changes

2024-09-28 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-41-20240927.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20240928.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 63 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 587.60 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Package updates missing in Fedora 41 but present in Fedora 40

2024-09-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:12:20PM +0200, Peter Hanecak wrote: > Hello, > > On 9/27/24 13:13, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > - tipcutils-0:3.0.6-1.fc40 > tipcutils-0:3.0.4-11.fc41 > > > > Package was updated to 3.0.6 on Rawhide, Fedora 40, 39, and EPEL 9, > > but Fedora 41 was missed. > > IIRC i686

Re: Package updates missing in Fedora 41 but present in Fedora 40

2024-09-28 Thread Peter Hanecak
Hello, On 9/27/24 13:13, Fabio Valentini wrote: - tipcutils-0:3.0.6-1.fc40 > tipcutils-0:3.0.4-11.fc41 Package was updated to 3.0.6 on Rawhide, Fedora 40, 39, and EPEL 9, but Fedora 41 was missed. IIRC i686 build failed for this one[1]. Since I did not had time for that back then, so I've po

Re: SPDX Statistics - Dvořák Edition

2024-09-28 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 27. 09. 24 v 4:27 odp. Karolina Surma napsal(a): I second Ben's findings, all of my packages have been migrated with a commit message saying "Review the License tag according to the SPDX standard" and with an added "# SPDX" comment if there was no change of the string. The automation should