Fedora eln compose report: 20240925.n.0 changes

2024-09-24 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20240924.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20240925.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 41 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 17.14 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: FailsToInstall bugs, can we have it enable on EPEL branches ?

2024-09-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:19 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > While that is getting done, I have got my will-it-install page back up and > working for epel10 > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/epel/willit/epel10/status-wont-install.html > > It's only updating once a day, at least until I get Diego's ch

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: FailsToInstall bugs, can we have it enable on EPEL branches ?

2024-09-24 Thread Troy Dawson
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 3:05 PM Carl George wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 3:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 21. 09. 24 20:00, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Sat, 2024-09-21 at 10:03 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> Please note that this comme

Re: [Canceled] Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-09-24)

2024-09-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 04:50:13PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The only topic pending tomorrow's FESCo meeting is the issue > "#3271 [F41 blocker] Ensure that all packages with dead.package > are removed from repos" > and they are already all blocked. > > Since that was the only issue, the FESCo m

Fedora 41 compose report: 20240924.n.0 changes

2024-09-24 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-41-20240923.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20240924.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:10 Upgraded packages: 67 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 851.00 KiB Size of dropped packages:612.79 MiB

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240924.n.0 changes

2024-09-24 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240923.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240924.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 105 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.62 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Broken metalink for EPEL10

2024-09-24 Thread Zdeněk Žamberský
I think they will probably close it as duplicate, but we'll see, thanks. On 24. 09. 24 13:17, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Tue, 24 Sept 2024 at 07:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: Such issues can be reported to Fedora Infrastructure at https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues Th

Re: Broken metalink for EPEL10

2024-09-24 Thread Zdeněk Žamberský
This seems like relevant issue, thanks for pointer. On 24. 09. 24 13:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: Such issues can be reported to Fedora Infrastructure at https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues This particular issue may be relevant: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12178 On

Re: Broken metalink for EPEL10

2024-09-24 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 24 Sept 2024 at 07:16, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Such issues can be reported to Fedora Infrastructure at > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues > > This particular issue may be relevant: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12178 > > I just opened https://pagure.io/fe

Re: Broken metalink for EPEL10

2024-09-24 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
Such issues can be reported to Fedora Infrastructure at https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues This particular issue may be relevant: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12178 On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 1:12 PM Zdeněk Žamberský wrote: > > Hello, > metalink for epel-10 seems broken

Broken metalink for EPEL10

2024-09-24 Thread Zdeněk Žamberský
Hello, metalink for epel-10 seems broken, causing install failures. Returned links to repomd.xml are wrong. e.g.: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/10/Everything/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml instead of: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/10/Everything/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml Example o

[Test-Announce]Fedora 41 Branched 20240924.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2024-09-24 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 41 Branched 20240924.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

F42 Change Proposal: Ansible 11 (Self-Contained)

2024-09-24 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible11 Discussion Thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-ansible-11-self-contained/132053 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals

Re: Removal of osgi dependency generators

2024-09-24 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
As no one seems to be interested in keeping the osgi generators, I will proceed to remove them starting from Fedora 42. On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 10:18 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > Hi. > > I'm considering deprecating and eventually removing osgi > Provides/Requires generators. Does anyone have any

F42 Change Proposal: Setuptools 74+ (System-Wide)

2024-09-24 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Setuptools_74%2B Discussion Thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-setuptools-74-system-wide/132052 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, pro

F42 Change Proposal: Third Party Legacy JDKs (System-Wide)

2024-09-24 Thread Aoife Moloney
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThirdPartyLegacyJdks Discussion Topic - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-third-party-legacy-jdks-system-wide/132049 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Change