OLD: Fedora-eln-20240923.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20240924.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 28
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:1.49 MiB
Size of
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:05 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Additionally, wf-recoder doesn't seem to build at all because a patch
> in the package fails to apply.
>
I've fixed this and have successfully built wf-recorder in the side-tag.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
__
Hi,
I want to create the accel-ppp package and am having trouble adding
library versioning. CMake has a SOVERSION but that for some reason isn't
adding versioning.
I'm trying both the accel-pppd itself, didn't work. try each module
individually, fails on build:
CMake Error at CMakeLists.tx
The only topic pending tomorrow's FESCo meeting is the issue
"#3271 [F41 blocker] Ensure that all packages with dead.package
are removed from repos"
and they are already all blocked.
Since that was the only issue, the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC
in #meeting:fedoraproject.org is canceled.
I
At the bottom of https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/tests/#_enabling it
shows:
It is possible to separate tests into multiple playbooks, each of them can
represent a test or a part of a test. Testing system will run each playbook
matching the glob tests/tests*.yml separately in a clean envir
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 12:31 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Did you forget to merge the pr?
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cantata/pull-request/4#request_diff
Yes ... well, no, I didn't forget, but I had assumed that all
necessary PRs had already been merged.
We'll try again after rebasing th
Did you forget to merge the pr?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cantata/pull-request/4#request_diff
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
maxw...@gtmx.me kirjoitti 23.9.2024 klo 21.38:
Report started at 2024-09-23 18:00:57 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a prop
I've taken pmix and pycanberra. Co-maintainers welcome.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Co
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 5:17 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I see some failures that I need to look at, but possibly at least some
> of them might be caused by "I just submitted things alphabetically and
> not in the correct order".
Quick update:
Most packages built fine, but it appears that eith
Report started at 2024-09-23 18:00:57 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_
Ah, that did it. Thank you. Now I see the warnings outside fedora-review.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.o
On Monday, 23 September 2024 at 19:26, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> I'm performing a new package review on php-pecl-redis6:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238342
>
> It's a pretty simple package, but there are about ~160
> undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings in rpmlint produced during the
I'm performing a new package review on php-pecl-redis6:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238342
It's a pretty simple package, but there are about ~160
undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings in rpmlint produced during the fedora-review.
Sample output is below.
However, if I run rpmlint on
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 6:28 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> The Fedora Multimedia SIG is beginning the effort to upgrade to ffmpeg
> v7 in Rawhide. So far, this is what I've determined to be the list of
> reverse dependencies:
>
> alsa-plugins-1.2.12-2.fc41.src.rpm
> aqualung-1.2-7.fc41.s
# F41 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2024-09-23
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker
-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 2
proposed blockers for Final.
Here is a handy l
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 2:43 PM Andre Robatino
wrote:
> As a list administrator for the test-announce list, I received an
> identical message to approve for that list, and when I logged into my
> dashboard and clicked on the message to see the full content, got an error
> something like "This mes
OLD: Fedora-41-20240922.n.0
NEW: Fedora-41-20240923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 58
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 13.92 MiB
Size of dropped packages:162.62 KiB
Hello!
live555 is getting updated to 2024.09.20 in rawhide and it comes with
an SONAME bump (.112 to .114). The only dependent package is vlc and
the rebuild will be done as part of FFmpeg upgrade in the same side-tag
(f42-build-side-96586).
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240922.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 49
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.18 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday, 23
September at 13:00 UTC. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone
to attend. You can join us over on Matrix in the Fedora Meeting channel:
https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org
You can u
On Wed, 18 Sept 2024 at 15:36, Dmitry Belyavskiy
wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 10:05 PM Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
>
> > It's fixed in rawhide now, but are we still against fixing it for F41?
> > Affected Fedora packages might have been fixed, but people build other
> > sof
22 matches
Mail list logo
