OLD: Fedora-eln-20240913.n.1
NEW: Fedora-eln-20240914.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
I just made a PR on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glfw/pull-request/6
Then the installability test failed because it got a 403 on "dnf install
createrepo_c".
https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/ef6b74c1-7335-499c-a15a-c367b6dfa25a/
Checked that the package indeed lives in el8
> [root@siriu
Version 2.8.9 of nauty has been released. Versions 2.8.8 and earlier
only supported building a static library. In Fedora, we have been
using a patch that originated with Debian to add shared library
support. With version 2.8.9, nauty upstream has rolled out their own
shared library support. How
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:35:06 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> $ grep -R filter_setup
> audacious-plugins.spec:%filter_setup
A false positive, because such a simple grep doesn't handle the %if/%else
used in that spec file.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 9:05 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 04:50:39PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > == Scope ==
> > * Proposal owners:
> > ** DONE: Package [https://github.com/FEX-Emu/FEX FEX] in Fedora Linux
> > - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fex-emu
> > ** WIP: Create
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 04:50:39PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> ** DONE: Package [https://github.com/FEX-Emu/FEX FEX] in Fedora Linux
> - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fex-emu
> ** WIP: Create a [https://pagure.io/fedora-kiwi-descriptions/ Kiwi
> definition]
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 7:25 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 8:53 AM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
> > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FEX
> > Discussion Post -
> > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-integrate-fex-in-fedora-linux-self-contained/131
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 8:53 AM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FEX
> Discussion Post -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-integrate-fex-in-fedora-linux-self-contained/131147
>
> This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
> This doc
Thanks Gary, is there any documentation on how the rules work? I _think_
I created the appropriate rule but I haven’t received any notification
and it’s likely I just did it wrong.
On 13 Sep 2024, at 11:00, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 3:40 PM Ron Olson
wrote:
Hey all, I
OLD: Fedora-eln-20240912.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20240913.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:45
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:30.27 MiB
Size
On 2024-09-13 01:35, Vít Ondruch wrote:
get_iplayer.spec:- conditionalise %%filter_setup properly.
Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312230 to track this,
thanks for the heads up.
Cheers
Davide
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 3:40 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all, I think I remember that I’d get an email when a build submitted to
> koji completed, regardless of whether it was scratch or not. Am I remembering
> that correctly and if so, is it still possible to get them?
>
> Thanks for any info!
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:28:51AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Hi Fedora-devel
Hi!
long time no see! images.linuxcontainers.org is now blocking LXC usage –
there seems to be a complex background history to that. Trying to drop
recent Fedora LXC images on an LXC host, I can't find an LXC-com
Hey all, I _think_ I remember that I’d get an email when a build
submitted to koji completed, regardless of whether it was scratch or
not. Am I remembering that correctly and if so, is it still possible to
get them?
Thanks for any info!
Ron--
___
d
Hi Fedora-devel
long time no see! images.linuxcontainers.org is now blocking LXC usage –
there seems to be a complex background history to that. Trying to drop
recent Fedora LXC images on an LXC host, I can't find an LXC-compatible
image server.
Is there one? Is there one in the works?
(Unfortun
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 41 RC 20240913.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
OLD: Fedora-41-20240912.n.0
NEW: Fedora-41-20240913.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:698.51 KiB
Size of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240911.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240913.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 164
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.68 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello Peter,
I am taking python-solc-ast.
Please if you can have a look on python-pyxlsb2
seems I have lost reviewer there - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
id=2246454
Best regards
Michal Ambroz
-- Původní e-mail --
Od: Peter Lemenkov
Komu: Development discussions rela
For ages, I had opened this PR [1] which was recently closed. This made
me to dig into this a bit and it seems there is still quite a lot of
packages using the old style dependency generators. I'd suggest to
update those to the modern generators. The list of the affected packages
is here:
~~
I will start with the tidbit first today. Why "Almost There Edition"? You can
find that in
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?gid=0#gid=0
we are done from 81%. But I will offer different view: 5970 packages are not converted yet. But out of
21 matches
Mail list logo
