On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 2:50 AM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
> Do not remove ExcludeArch: %{ix86}, see:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
Changes reverted.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
OLD: Fedora-eln-20240909.n.2
NEW: Fedora-eln-20240910.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 9/8/24 16:56, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
It took me a while to iron out the kinks, but I think I made it. I've
tested everything in mock locally before doing anything in dist-git. I
have some doubts about building goffice and gnumeric on ix86, but if
that fails, I can revert to the previous
OLD: Fedora-eln-20240906.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20240909.n.2
= SUMMARY =
Added images:26
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 29
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 69.09 MiB
Size of dropped packages:13.36 MiB
On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 14:47 +, Hirotaka Wakabayashi via devel
wrote:
> Hello, I am going to orphan following packages because the dependent
> package, python3-eventlet, could not build in this cycle.
>
> python3-oslo-concurrency
> python3-oslo-concurrency-tests
> python3-oslo-messaging
> pyt
Dne 09. 09. 24 v 7:34 odp. Peter Robinson napsal(a):
Was there ever a resolution to this thread [1] around
LicenseRef-Callaway-Redistributable-no-modification-permitted in
particular for the linux-firmware package?
[1]https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg316158.html
I understand that
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 12:09 PM Dan Horák wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:24:03 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:15 odp. Scott Talbert napsal(a):
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Bellow is list of packages that have license
> > > >> Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as
> > > >> Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be validated neither
> > > >> using
> > > >> 'license-validate' nor using 'license-validate --old'.
> > > >>
> > > >> swt2c perl-Data-Validate-IP
> > > >
> >
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 12:09 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:24:03 +0200
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:15 odp. Scott Talbert napsal(a):
> > > On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neith
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:24:03 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:15 odp. Scott Talbert napsal(a):
> > On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as
> >> Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be v
Dne 09. 09. 24 v 16:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 04. 09. 24 v 22:43 Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a):
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 12:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
And the package has been retired in Rawhide, because RPM 4.20+ provides
its own implementation (and there should not be other users to my
knowl
Hello, I am going to orphan following packages because the dependent
package, python3-eventlet, could not build in this cycle.
python3-oslo-concurrency
python3-oslo-concurrency-tests
python3-oslo-messaging
python3-oslo-messaging-tests
python3-oslo-service
python3-oslo-service-tests
python3-k2hr
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 04:00:57PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 09. 09. 24 v 3:33 odp. Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> >
> > Neat. This would allow to slap in some comments, right? E.g:
> >
> >
> > ~~~
> >
> > License: %{shrink:
> > %dnl src/*.*
> > MIT AND
Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:21 odp. Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
But that is upstream stuff, isn't it?
It is "a format". Nothing stops us to use it aside of spec file. Or in comments in spec file. Just to find consensus
how to use it and put it guidelines. :)
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Pa
Dne 09. 09. 24 v 4:15 odp. Scott Talbert napsal(a):
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as
Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be validated neither using
'license-validate' nor using 'license-validate --old'.
Dne 09. 09. 24 v 16:00 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 09. 09. 24 v 3:33 odp. Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Neat. This would allow to slap in some comments, right? E.g:
~~~
License: %{shrink:
%dnl src/*.*
MIT AND
BSL-1.0 AND %dnl doc/*.*
Dne 06. 09. 24 v 8:43 odp. Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
Can you do a updated run so we can see how many are left after that
change?
Here is updated list. And I already started opening PR for packages at src.fedoraproject.org because each case is
special and PR is likely the best way. This list is ba
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Bellow is list of packages that have licenses that are neither valid as
Callaway nor as SPDX. I.e. the license cannot be validated neither using
'license-validate' nor using 'license-validate --old'.
swt2c perl-Data-Validate-IP
I recently update
Dne 04. 09. 24 v 22:43 Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a):
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 12:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
And the package has been retired in Rawhide, because RPM 4.20+ provides
its own implementation (and there should not be other users to my
knowledge):
I just started using it, it saves me the
Dne 09. 09. 24 v 3:33 odp. Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Neat. This would allow to slap in some comments, right? E.g:
~~~
License: %{shrink:
%dnl src/*.*
MIT AND
BSL-1.0 AND %dnl doc/*.*
BSD-2-Clause AND
(Apache-2
Dne 04. 09. 24 v 15:36 Leslie Satenstein via devel napsal(a):
I have frustrations with bugzilla, and please, if you can, try the
following
sudo dnf/dnf5 install meld aisleriot
With every days F41 update the above crashes, and then...
I think you need `meld-3.22.2-5.fc41` from `updates-test
Dne 06. 09. 24 v 13:08 Ben Beasley napsal(a):
There are still packages in this list that appear to have valid
license expressions, but aren’t amenable to spec-file grepping because
they use the %shrink macro to split long license expressions across
multiple lines. Looking at this list:
mus
Dne 08. 09. 24 v 17:35 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 08. 09. 24 v 3:54 odp. Barry napsal(a):
$ LC_ALL=C rpmspec -q --qf '%{license}\n' ruby.spec
error: ruby.spec: line 241: failed to load macro file
/home/msuchy/rpmbuild/SOURCES/macros.ruby
I have hit rslated issues like this in the past, rpm
Hi folks,
The Fedora Linux 41 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[1] will take place on
Thursday 12th September @ 1700 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org[2].
At this time, we will determine the status of the F41 Beta release
date [3] that is currently targeting Tuesday 17th September.
[1] https://fedoraproje
OLD: Fedora-41-20240908.n.0
NEW: Fedora-41-20240909.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 9:57 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:30 AM Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> > Great, can you pls ask for permissions there? I can approve it.
>
> Are you sure it can work this way? For the packages I'm the
> maintainer, there is a setting
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240908.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240909.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 41
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 297.70 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday, 09
September at 13:00 UTC. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone
to attend. You can join us over on Matrix in the Fedora Meeting channel:
https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org
You can u
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:30 AM Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
>
>>
> Great, can you pls ask for permissions there? I can approve it.
Are you sure it can work this way? For the packages I'm the
maintainer, there is a settings panel which allows me to add users or
groups and grant them admin access. I
29 matches
Mail list logo
