On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 2:15 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Version 3.34 of libsvm has been released, and bumps the soname of the
> library. I would like to update libsvm and rebuild the consuming
> packages:
> - clisp
> - openms
> - perl-Algorithm-SVM
>
> I maintain clisp. The other maintainers are BC
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
=
Meeting started by @conan_kudo:matrix.org at 2024-09-03 17:02:28
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Init Process (@conan_kudo:matrix.org, 17:03:21)
* TOPIC: #3264 Incomplete Cha
Summary:
HP ENVY x360 (Ryzen 5 4500U w/ Intel SSD)
I've been running Fedora on my laptop for about 3 years and just now had
this issue and have reproduced it twice after fresh installs.
I have tested my memory 15+ times with Memtest86, multiple SMART checks on
the NVME drive, and 10 complete HP
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 02:54:37PM GMT, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:20:24AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I maintain the cpufetch package [0], which is a program that allows the
> > user to retrieve some info about the CPU of the machine - such
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Tuesday, September 3rd, 2024 at 3:33 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:46 PM
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:46 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
wrote:
>
> I'm the abiword maintainer and a provenpackager. Let me know how I can help.
Thank you Gwyn, you're the only one I wasn't worried about.
I was thinking of giving the other maintainers some time to chime in,
maybe until this weekend a
OLD: Fedora-ELN-20240830.n.7
NEW: Fedora-ELN-20240903.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 258
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 87
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.86 GiB
Size of dropped packages:42.93 MiB
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:45 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
> on Matrix.
>
And of course I mean Tuesday in the subject, not Thursday. Which is today.
--
Neal Gompa (FAS:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-09-03 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
I get the following result on my F40 machine:
```
Error:
Problem: package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-18.fc41.x86_64 from fedora
requires libre2.so.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-15.fc40.x86_64
- re2-1:20220601-19.fc40.
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 13:43:20 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:25:34 +0300
> Yanko Kaneti wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 11:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > > when I try to build the rawhide package for shotcut-24.08.29-1.fc42, it
> > > fails [1] on i686
> >
I'm the abiword maintainer and a provenpackager. Let me know how I can help.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Monday, September 2nd, 2024
> > > * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do
> > > not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems.
> >
> > One thing I've noticed with dnf5 is that somethings are missing, I'm
> > not sure if they've been replaced with something else. EG "dnf
> > conf
V Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > One note:
> >
> > * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do
> > not forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems.
>
> One thing I've noticed with dnf5 is that somethings are missing, I
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:20:24AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I maintain the cpufetch package [0], which is a program that allows the
> user to retrieve some info about the CPU of the machine - such as cache
> size, frequency, sometimes also the manufacturer and model.
>
>
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 09:54:38PM +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 9:40 PM Dridi Boukelmoune
> wrote:
> >
> > > > I can't say I'm proud of this hack but at least, the error message
> > > > shows up to give a clue. I can finally add some error handling to my
> > > > depende
Hi,
$ rpmbuild -bs pyliblo3.spec
$ mock -r fedora-42-x86_64 ../SRPMS/pyliblo3-0.16.2-0.4.git91d1781.fc40.src.rpm
There is a build error on rawhide, how can i fix this ?
gcc -fno-strict-overflow -Wsign-compare -DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=1
-DNDEBUG -fcf-protection -fexceptions -fcf-protect
> One note:
>
> * you may want to run the same command with dnf5 to help test new dnf. Do not
> forget to add --best otherwise DNF5 hides all problems.
One thing I've noticed with dnf5 is that somethings are missing, I'm
not sure if they've been replaced with something else. EG "dnf
config-manage
I tried both dnf & dnf5 on my three Fedora installations, which, for the
most part, only have the minimal development tools needed to build and
test our software (Cube, OTF2, OPARI2, Score-P, Scalasca).
Everything seemed to work fine without any errors. Also tried to update
one of the installati
OLD: Fedora-41-20240902.n.0
NEW: Fedora-41-20240903.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:36.96 KiB
Size of
$ sudo dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:26 ago on Tue 03 Sep 2024 07:30:01 AM CDT.
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package signal-libringrtc-2.46.1-1.1.x86_64
- package signal-libringrtc-2.46.1-1.1.x86_64 from @
Tested on Fedora 40 running Gnome with nvidia hybrid on a zephyrus g14
laptop, no errors to report
On Mon, 2 Sept 2024, 15:51 Miroslav Suchý, wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testi
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240902.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240903.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 126
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.27 MiB
Size of dropped packages
I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for fbo (Fabien
Boucher)[1]. This email is part of that process.
Besides the email in their FAS profile (fbouc...@redhat.com), does
anyone know how to contact Fabien?
Fabien has not responded to FTBFS bugs on python-fb-re2 in F41[2] and
F42[3],
Thanks, will add ExcludeArch:%{ix86}
Regards
Martin
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/
On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:25:34 +0300
Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 11:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > when I try to build the rawhide package for shotcut-24.08.29-1.fc42, it
> > fails [1] on i686
> >
> > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12287890
Hello
On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 11:14 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> when I try to build the rawhide package for shotcut-24.08.29-1.fc42, it fails
> [1] on i686
>
> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=122878905
Shotcut looks like a prime candidate for
https://fedoraproject.org/
I think the correct solution here will be to build the “official” Python
bindings in the re2 source distribution, which are actively maintained and
which also provide a somewhat-compatible “import re2,” but are distributed on
PyPI as google-re2 rather than fb-re2.
As the new maintainer of the r
Dne 03. 09. 24 v 11:20 dop. Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a):
Looking at the build history in koji, my builds ran on:
- buildhw-a64-03.iad2.fedoraproject.org
Are you able to reproduce the build failure in Copr? If yes, then you can ssh
there:
https://frostyx.cz/posts/ssh-access-to-copr-builder
Hi,
when I try to build the rawhide package for shotcut-24.08.29-1.fc42, it fails
[1] on i686
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=122878905
Regards
Martin
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
ok, thanks.
Regards
Martin
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guideli
Hi Artur,
> I maintain the cpufetch package [0], which is a program that allows the
> user to retrieve some info about the CPU of the machine - such as cache
> size, frequency, sometimes also the manufacturer and model.
>
> A few weeks ago, the program had a new release and I updated the package.
Did run through a full update with dnf4 on my Fedora 40 i3 Spin
install to 41 i3 spin (Pre Release) and nothing exploded on my
ThinkPad Edge 0217A16 laptop
https://i.imgur.com/vReaIwy.png
Den tis 3 sep. 2024 kl 10:38 skrev Luna Jernberg :
>
> Odd as i also had problems with RPMFusion
> but remove
On Tuesday, 3 September 2024 10:53:56 WEST Martin Gansser wrote:
> cp scripts/dump_osc.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/
> cp scripts/send_osc.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/
You can merge this into a single line. Another suggestion is to preserve the
time stamps (for example using -a):
cp -a script
problem solved by changing this in the rpm spec file.
%prep
%autosetup -p1 -n pyliblo3-%{commit0}
# Remove pregenerated Cython C sources and build it again
rm -rf pyliblo3/_liblo.c
# Fix permissions (fix for rpmlint warning "spurious-executable-perm")
chmod 644 NEWS README.md COPYING
%generate_
Hi all,
I maintain the cpufetch package [0], which is a program that allows the
user to retrieve some info about the CPU of the machine - such as cache
size, frequency, sometimes also the manufacturer and model.
A few weeks ago, the program had a new release and I updated the package.
However, th
Odd as i also had problems with RPMFusion
but removed it and then it works, just updated 1.3GB of Fedora 40
updates on my test laptop and now downloading and installing 2.3GB of
Fedora 41 pre release packages
Den tis 3 sep. 2024 kl 10:09 skrev Leigh Scott :
>
> You have some other issue as all tho
You have some other issue as all those rpmfusion dep issues are bogus.
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On 2.09.2024 12:20, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run:
> > dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --ass
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno
distro-sync
I got this:
Error:
Problem 1: package ghc-foldable1-classes-compat-0
39 matches
Mail list logo
