On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 7:09 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 5:32 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 4:49 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 10:28 Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hey all,
> > >>
> > >> pkgconf 2.3.0 just released and the
Thanks for the welcome Alexander!
Vacation understandable - No hurry, no worry.
I was puzzled about the earlier message, puzzle solved.
Hopefully nothing liquid spilled.
Cheers,
Joe
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
Thanks for the help.
For the record, the issue was that doing a dnf update on the VM and simply
accepting everything was installing some fedora 42 packages, specifically some
GPG keys. When I ran without doing an update first, it worked.
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Smith
> Sent:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:01:54AM GMT, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> Hi, Kevin.
>
> I spotted an issue where one of my Bodhi updates for F41 got marked as
> obsoleted by an F42 update
> and now F42 is updated, F40 has an update in testing, whereas F41 has the old
> package version.
> Is is pos
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 04:40:25PM GMT, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 16/08/24 11:01, Stephen Smoogen ha scritto:
> > There is currently a bug in the Fedora mailman which is causing emails
> > sent to multiple lists to delete some copies of the emails. It is
> > being looked at by the upstre
Try to re post the content:
In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you
can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the
pro
Il 16/08/24 11:01, Stephen Smoogen ha scritto:
> There is currently a bug in the Fedora mailman which is causing emails
> sent to multiple lists to delete some copies of the emails. It is
> being looked at by the upstream to figure out why and how to fix.
>
>
Yeah, but I just sent the email to de
Hot news:
* Almost all trivial conversion has been done. Only 208 "trivial" cases remains. I will not continue converting them to
SPDX counterpart as there are various caveats hidden there. I will go over the remaining cases one by one. But it is
likely that most of them will be converted to so
You should install the mock-core-config and distribution-gpg-keys rpms
for the version of Fedora that is running fedpkg. If I am reading your
first post correctly, you are using an F41 vm to run "fedpkg --release
f41 mockbuild".
distribution-gpg-keys-1.105-1.fc41 should already be in stable
accord
Hello All! 2-nd try (a first message was sent w/o subject).
I swill have a few packages for Review and I am willing to return a favour.
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2304209 - solidity - Object-oriented,
high-level language for implementing smart contracts
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2304178 - p
There was no change. Questions:
1 - I applied this to the F39 host, not the F41 VM. Was that right?
2 - The links are to .fc40. Is there a similar patch for F39?
3 - Does it make sense that an F41 build would try to load
fedora-gpg-keys-0:42-0.1.noarch?
> -Original Message-
> From:
As shared bt @music on the Fedora build system matrix channel, this
happens after a new Fedora release is branched. You can install these
two packages to update your system to work correctly.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4a6de3d12d
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE
I'm trying to build my package for Fedora 41 (an F41 VM on an F39 host if
that matters). Is it pulling in something from F42?
The error is:
fedpkg --release f41 mockbuild
.
[snip]
.
Transaction failed: Signature verification failed.
PGP check for package "fedora-gpg-keys-42-0.1.noarch"
(/var/lib
OLD: Fedora-41-20240815.n.0
NEW: Fedora-41-20240816.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 71
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 749.65 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240815.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240816.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 62
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 150
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 448.25 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi, since I noticed that a couple of my rawhide builds, that completed less
than an hour before f41 branching occurred, did not get tagged with f42:
today I decided to check for other such builds:
$ TZ=UTC koji-tool builds --before "2024-08-13 15:10" -p "*.fc41" -l 19 -s
complete | sed -e 's/Build
Hi, Kevin.
I spotted an issue where one of my Bodhi updates for F41 got marked as
obsoleted by an F42 update
and now F42 is updated, F40 has an update in testing, whereas F41 has the old
package version.
Is is possible to re-tag the F41 build?
Obsoleted update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/u
Hello Joe,
Welcome to Fedora!
Given that a lot of people are currently on vacation, you might need
to be a little patient for your package review.
I'm looking forward to seeing your packages in the distribution and I
hope you'll enjoy working on Fedora and being part of the community.
I'm terribly
Hi Neil,
just expressing a bit of gratitude for slurm getting adopted. I've had the fun of trying
to roll out long-time-since-last-packaged older HPC schedulers (son of gridengine), and,
this is cool, especially seeing that you're active in the Rocky HPC SIG. I think that
already packages slur
On čtvrtek 15. srpna 2024 15:44:26, SELČ Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> The epel-8-* and epel-9-* chroots in Fedora Copr are aliases
> to the "rhel+epel-*" chroots from `mock-core-configs` package. We'd
> like to have the same approach for `epel-10` once there's a released
> variant of RHEL 10 GA.
>
> Fo
Pavel Raiskup venit, vidit, dixit 2024-08-16 11:06:21:
> On čtvrtek 15. srpna 2024 17:02:30, SELČ Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Neal Gompa venit, vidit, dixit 2024-08-15 16:14:30:
> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 9:45 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The epel-8-* and epel-9-* chroots in Fedora C
Thanks!
I've found it and added "latest"
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f40-build/latest/x86_64/ )
to the list of extra repositories. Later I'll switch to side tags as
Florian suggested.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:11 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> On čtvrtek 15. srpna 2024 22:27:11, SELČ
On čtvrtek 15. srpna 2024 22:27:11, SELČ Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Peter Lemenkov:
>
> > Hello All!
> > I have a few Bodhi build overrides and I love to use them in Copr. Is
> > it possible? At least is it possible to enable updates-testing
> > repository?
>
> You can request a side tag and refer
On čtvrtek 15. srpna 2024 17:02:30, SELČ Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Neal Gompa venit, vidit, dixit 2024-08-15 16:14:30:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 9:45 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > >
> > > The epel-8-* and epel-9-* chroots in Fedora Copr are aliases
> > > to the "rhel+epel-*" chroots from `mock-cor
There is currently a bug in the Fedora mailman which is causing emails sent
to multiple lists to delete some copies of the emails. It is being looked
at by the upstream to figure out why and how to fix.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 at 04:49, Christian Stadelmann <
genodeft...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Y
Your e-mail is missing the contents. Can you please try again?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pr
26 matches
Mail list logo
