Re: Self Introduction: Joe Da Silva

2024-08-15 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024, 06:38 Joe wrote: > Hi all, > My name is Joe Da Silva, some of you may already know me as JoesCat. > > I'm a hardware guy who's been tinkering with linux for a long time now. > ...basically: > Mandrake->Mandriva->Mageia. > ...and I'm still a Mageia user. > > ...however, > I'm

Self Introduction: Joe Da Silva

2024-08-15 Thread Joe
Hi all, My name is Joe Da Silva, some of you may already know me as JoesCat. I'm a hardware guy who's been tinkering with linux for a long time now. ...basically: Mandrake->Mandriva->Mageia. ...and I'm still a Mageia user. ...however, I'm also aware, that many distros tend to follow Debian, or Re

Re: Unannounced soname bump in libre2

2024-08-15 Thread Ben Beasley
I offered a simple patch via https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtwebengine/pull-request/18 for the initial error Sandro encountered in COPR, but I didn’t manage to get all the way to a successful build (even when python2 was available). The bundled chromium is built as C++14, and having ab

Re: Unannounced soname bump in libre2

2024-08-15 Thread Denis Arnaud
Thanks Sandro! qt5-qtwebengine seems to be the last package to rebuild after the re2 upgrade [1]. On my Fedora Rawhide VM, on which I still have Python2.7 (as it is a rollover rawhide in my case, which I upgrade regularly to keep in sync with the upstream Rawhide), qt5-qtwebengine builds almost

Re: Is it possible for Copr to use Bodhi build overrides?

2024-08-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Peter Lemenkov: > Hello All! > I have a few Bodhi build overrides and I love to use them in Copr. Is > it possible? At least is it possible to enable updates-testing > repository? You can request a side tag and reference its repository in the Copr configuration. The repositories have URLs like

Is it possible for Copr to use Bodhi build overrides?

2024-08-15 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! I have a few Bodhi build overrides and I love to use them in Copr. Is it possible? At least is it possible to enable updates-testing repository? -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

HEADS UP: scotch-7.0.4 landing in rawhide

2024-08-15 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'll be building scotch-7.0.4 for rawhide in the f42-build-side-94256 side tag. This is a minor update from 7.0.3, but the project has cleaned up the library versioning, so I'll also be rebuilding the following dependencies: freefem++ mmg MUMPS petsc qrmumps superlu_dist Sandro --

Re: Unannounced soname bump in libre2

2024-08-15 Thread Sandro
On 15-08-2024 19:43, Denis Arnaud wrote: The only one to keep failing up until now is qt5-qtwebengine (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtwebengine ), as the python2 package no longer seems to be available on Rawhide (but it is still available on Fedora 41). The failing statement on Rawh

Re: Unannounced soname bump in libre2

2024-08-15 Thread Denis Arnaud
A dedicated page was created on the Fedora wiki to coordinate the various builds: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Denisarnaud/Tasks/Ongoing/2024-08-re2 Most of the dependent packages have been successfully rebuilt (thanks to all the contributors!), or will soon be. The only one to keep fai

Fedora 41 compose report: 20240815.n.0 changes

2024-08-15 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-41-20240814.n.0 NEW: Fedora-41-20240815.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 48 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 78.69 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Orphaning glsl-language-server

2024-08-15 Thread Marián Konček
This package is no longer maintained by upstream. I have just packaged a working replacement in Fedora: glsl-analyzer. -- Marián Konček -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedora

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-08-15 Thread Ben Beasley
I just picked up re2. - Ben Beasley (FAS: music) On 8/14/24 10:49 PM, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote: Report started at 2024-08-15 02:00:06 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-08-15 Thread Neil Hanlon
took slurm, znc, python-gerritlib On 14.08.2024 21:49, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote: Report started at 2024-08-15 02:00:06 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retir

Re: Any advice on dealing with the issue of building package with side tag of f42-build-side-94214 on f41 branch

2024-08-15 Thread Felix Wang
Ohh, thanks for pointing the error as I misinterpreted the information. I have taken your advice. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: htt

Re: Any advice on dealing with the issue of building package with side tag of f42-build-side-94214 on f41 branch

2024-08-15 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Felix Wang wrote on 2024/08/15 23:00: The issue was also raised on releng issue of https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12262, but I do not know which place will be better on solving the issue. Anyway, I also posted the issue on the devel list here. A few moments ago, I decided to update the deepin

Re: Early adopting EPEL 10 in Fedora Copr?

2024-08-15 Thread Michael J Gruber
Neal Gompa venit, vidit, dixit 2024-08-15 16:14:30: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 9:45 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > The epel-8-* and epel-9-* chroots in Fedora Copr are aliases > > to the "rhel+epel-*" chroots from `mock-core-configs` package. We'd > > like to have the same approach for `epel-10`

Re: Early adopting EPEL 10 in Fedora Copr?

2024-08-15 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 9:45 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > The epel-8-* and epel-9-* chroots in Fedora Copr are aliases > to the "rhel+epel-*" chroots from `mock-core-configs` package. We'd > like to have the same approach for `epel-10` once there's a released > variant of RHEL 10 GA. > > For now t

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-08-15 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
Took python-logutils and python-pecan. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Wednesday, August 14th, 2024 at 9:49 PM, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote:

Any advice on dealing with the issue of building package with side tag of f42-build-side-94214 on f41 branch

2024-08-15 Thread Felix Wang
The issue was also raised on releng issue of https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12262, but I do not know which place will be better on solving the issue. Anyway, I also posted the issue on the devel list here. A few moments ago, I decided to update the deepin-dock to 6.0.37. So I should commit the

Early adopting EPEL 10 in Fedora Copr?

2024-08-15 Thread Pavel Raiskup
The epel-8-* and epel-9-* chroots in Fedora Copr are aliases to the "rhel+epel-*" chroots from `mock-core-configs` package. We'd like to have the same approach for `epel-10` once there's a released variant of RHEL 10 GA. For now though, there's the variant `centos-stream+epel-10` in the new mock-

Inactive provenpackagers for the F41 cycle

2024-08-15 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to multiple lists and previously handled on another list. -- ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240815.n.0 changes

2024-08-15 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240813.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240815.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 121 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 115.92 MiB Size of dropped packages

Orphaning python-hypothesis-fspaths

2024-08-15 Thread Lumír Balhar
Hello. I'm gonna orphan python-hypothesis-fspaths because we don't need it anymore and it is also a leaf package in Fedora. It has only one release from 2017 and the last commit in the project is 7 years old as well. Lumír -- ___ devel mailing li

License change for python-roman

2024-08-15 Thread Matthias Runge
Hi there, python-roman changed from python to zpl-2.1 Matthias -- Matthias Runge -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedor

Re: Unannounced soname bump in libre2

2024-08-15 Thread Denis Arnaud
Thanks for having caught that one! Fixed. The Fedora update for that mtxclient package for Fedora Rawhide (F42) is https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-e9e992dd11 I take that opportunity for a quick status/reference of the rebuilding on some of the dependent packages: * perl-Regex

Re: Unannounced soname bump in libre2

2024-08-15 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 14/08/2024 09:37, Denis Arnaud wrote: Thanks for the heads up (!)... and sorry for the unannounced bump. Please fix your tooling. You broke %autochangelog: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mtxclient/c/1749847d56c99c064f8eda14a2ef1e83d3f822e5?branch=rawhide You must use git commit --allow-

Re: Unannounced soname bump in libre2

2024-08-15 Thread Petr Pisar
V Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 03:01:22PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen napsal(a): > I think perl-Regexp-Pattern-License also needs to be rebuilt: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305082 It does not need. It's an unrelated bug. -- PEtr signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___

Re: Unannounced soname bump in libre2

2024-08-15 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
I think perl-Regexp-Pattern-License also needs to be rebuilt: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305082 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code o