Re: Formation of the Fedora Btrfs SIG

2024-08-02 Thread Philip Rhoades via devel
Michel, On 2024-08-03 05:40, Michel Lind wrote: Hello all, Some of us working on Btrfs in Fedora have decided to start a SIG to foster both better coordination, and also provide an easier way for others in the community to get in touch. Initial members (sorted by FAS): - Boris Burkov (bori

Re: Formation of the Fedora Btrfs SIG

2024-08-02 Thread luya
On 2024-08-02 12:40 p.m., Michel Lind wrote: Hello all, Some of us working on Btrfs in Fedora have decided to start a SIG to foster both better coordination, and also provide an easier way for others in the community to get in touch. Initial members (sorted by FAS): - Boris Burkov (borisb)

Formation of the Fedora Btrfs SIG

2024-08-02 Thread Michel Lind
Hello all, Some of us working on Btrfs in Fedora have decided to start a SIG to foster both better coordination, and also provide an easier way for others in the community to get in touch. Initial members (sorted by FAS): - Boris Burkov (borisb) - Chris Murphy (chrismurphy) - Davide Cavalca (dc

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

2024-08-02 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 02. 08. 24 14:30, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 12:19 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 16. 07. 24 17:08, Mark E. Fuller via devel wrote: But the magic switch I need appears to be: %global __python3 /usr/bin/python3.12 And: %global python3_pkgversion 3.12 Some packages succ

Re: flatpak vs pkg-config system libdir

2024-08-02 Thread Cristian Le via devel
On 2024/08/01 17:27, Owen Taylor wrote: On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Neal Gompa wrote: Well, if you have a general package that's shipped in every buildroot for flatpak builds, you can ship your own wrapper, and I can make it check if RPM_BUILD_ROOT is defined *and* this file exi

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

2024-08-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 12:19 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16. 07. 24 17:08, Mark E. Fuller via devel wrote: > > But the magic switch I need appears to be: > > > > %global __python3 /usr/bin/python3.12 > > And: > > %global python3_pkgversion 3.12 > > Some packages successfully build without this

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-23)

2024-08-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 17:02 Simon Farnsworth napsal(a): On Wednesday 31 July 2024 10:53:37 BST Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 24. 07. 24 v 20:17 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 24. 07. 24 v 12:30 odp. Joe Orton napsal(a): Having a "majority rule

[Test-Announce]Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240802.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2024-08-02 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240802.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Orphaned: egl-wayland, egl-gbm and eglexternalplatform

2024-08-02 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hey! On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 12:59 AM Leigh Scott wrote: > I have decided to orphan these packages as they are useless replacements > for the nvidia driver provided libs. > The rpmfusion 560+ driver will use the bundled libs. > > I believe it's time fedora dropped eglstream support. > > https://g

Re: sbin-merge: what to do?

2024-08-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:09:22PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2024-07-17 at 16:20 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > The current plan is to wait for the f41 branching, and try again after > > that. > > To be clear: do you mean try again for F41, or try again for F42? For F4

Re: Orphaned: egl-wayland, egl-gbm and eglexternalplatform

2024-08-02 Thread Leigh Scott
Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:59 PM Leigh Scott leigh123li...@gmail.com wrote: > > I have decided to orphan these packages as they are useless replacements > > for the nvidia driver provided libs. > > The rpmfusion 560+ driver will use the bundled libs. > > I believe it's time fedor