On 2024-07-31 9:40 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31 2024 at 09:23:12 AM -07:00:00, Kevin Fenzi
wrote:
Some possible ones I'll toss out there:
avahi-daemon
cups
rsyslog
dovecot
cockpit
Maybe gnome-remote-desktop?
Those all sound good to me. I'll work on opening some more PRs t
Hello,
please would be somebody having some spare time to review some of 3 new
package requests needed for the upgrade of the python-oletools package to
current version 0.60.2 ?
For some time I am trying to get to fedora update to current version of
oletools, but it requires some new python dep
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240730.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240731.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 192
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.27 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 6:57 odp. Richard Fontana napsal(a):
Oh never mind, that is not what you're doing. Still, I am concerned
about any mass replacement of Callaway "with exceptions", since that
could refer to anything, or did you handle this on a
package-by-package basis?
Good point. I will remove
Hi, I am working on wrapping up my Haskell Change for F41 and it would
really help me if there following packages could be reviewed quickly so
that I can use them to complete the work:
NEW ghc-crypton: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266044
NEW ghc-crypton-x509: https://bugzilla.redha
On 31-07-2024 18:50, Sandro via devel wrote:
On 31-07-2024 17:34, Sandro Mani wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302033. The source of
the issue is that the Requires: environment(modules) in rpm-mpi-hooks
(which is a BuildRequirement of openmpi/mpich) did not result in
env
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:52 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:13 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > This is a batch of remaining licenses that allows 1:1 conversion [*]. It
> > includes leftovers from previous migrations,
> > compound formulas and rarely used li
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:13 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> This is a batch of remaining licenses that allows 1:1 conversion [*]. It
> includes leftovers from previous migrations,
> compound formulas and rarely used licenses.
>
> The proposed diff is here https://k00.fr/5i348p12
> Unless s
On 31-07-2024 17:34, Sandro Mani wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302033. The source of
the issue is that the Requires: environment(modules) in rpm-mpi-hooks
(which is a BuildRequirement of openmpi/mpich) did not result in
environment-modules getting installed, which brok
On Wed, Jul 31 2024 at 09:23:12 AM -07:00:00, Kevin Fenzi
wrote:
Some possible ones I'll toss out there:
avahi-daemon
cups
rsyslog
dovecot
cockpit
Maybe gnome-remote-desktop?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 01:03:14PM GMT, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> It seems PDC was turned off about 12 hours ago.
yeah, we have actually been disabling it and thinking we were done, but
then something still has it's tendrils into it and we re-enable it to
fix that, etc.
It's now been down for
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:33:21PM GMT, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> tl;dr: Quick update, and one question: Are there other packages that should
> be monitored?
>
>
>
> On 2024-06-24 9:03 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > (As a topic for later: the tirpc library exports functions with the same
> > name a
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 05:21:29PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 31. 07. 24 v 15:12 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:54 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 24. 07. 24 v 20:17 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Miroslav Suchý
> >
Hi
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302033. The source of
the issue is that the Requires: environment(modules) in rpm-mpi-hooks
(which is a BuildRequirement of openmpi/mpich) did not result in
environment-modules getting installed, which broke the dependency
generation by rpm-
Hi folks,
There are a few hours left today to fill out our short AI/ML survey[1] for
Fedora. The Fedora council created this survey to try to understand the
sentiment of our community when it comes to using AI/ML for or in the
Fedora Projects ecosystem as we intend to create some guidelines for th
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 15:12 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:54 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 24. 07. 24 v 20:17 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 24. 07. 24 v 12:30 odp. Joe Orton napsal(a):
Having a "majority rule" vote o
On Wednesday 31 July 2024 10:53:37 BST Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 24. 07. 24 v 20:17 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> >> Dne 24. 07. 24 v 12:30 odp. Joe Orton napsal(a):
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Having a "majority rule" vote of e.g. packager
Hi,
It seems something is going on with RPM metadata generation.
With the latest update of openmpi the generated metadata has changed:
$ rpm -q --provides -p openmpi-5.0.5-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm
config(openmpi) = 5.0.5-1.fc41
libmpi.so.40()(64bit)
libmpi_java.so.40()(64bit)
libmpi_mpifh.so.40()(64bi
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:54 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 24. 07. 24 v 20:17 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >> Dne 24. 07. 24 v 12:30 odp. Joe Orton napsal(a):
> >>
> >> Having a "majority rule" vote of e.g. packagers or provenpackagers
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 11:14 dop. Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check
How to reproduce this warning?
These lines
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt#_16
My script put it there whenever both:
$
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 11:58 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 11:16 dop. Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
I probably don't understand right the first one:
~~~
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/aces_container.spec
rpm-specs/aces_container.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/aces_container.spec 2024-07-18
04:00:12.
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 11:16 dop. Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
I probably don't understand right the first one:
~~~
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/aces_container.spec rpm-specs/aces_container.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/aces_container.spec 2024-07-18 04:00:12.0 +0200
+++ rpm-specs/aces_container.spec
Dne 24. 07. 24 v 20:17 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:46 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 24. 07. 24 v 12:30 odp. Joe Orton napsal(a):
Having a "majority rule" vote of e.g. packagers or provenpackagers on
major technical decisions would be far superior, in my view. Apache
I probably don't understand right the first one:
~~~
diff -Naur rpm-specs.orig/aces_container.spec rpm-specs/aces_container.spec
--- rpm-specs.orig/aces_container.spec 2024-07-18 04:00:12.0
+0200
+++ rpm-specs/aces_container.spec 2024-07-31 10:52:00.694637327 +0200
@@ -3,10 +3,11
Dne 30. 07. 24 v 16:07 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
As the SPDX Change slowly finishes I focused on the license that I
regularly report as:
warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check
How to reproduce this warning?
Vít
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
Hi.
This is a batch of remaining licenses that allows 1:1 conversion [*]. It includes leftovers from previous migrations,
compound formulas and rarely used licenses.
The proposed diff is here https://k00.fr/5i348p12
Affected packages: https://k00.fr/zszrcmgr
Unless somebody stop me, I will
V Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 05:46:56PM -0400, Richard Fontana napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 1:24 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> >> perl-RPC-XML hobbes1069 jplesnik ppisar
> >
> > This one I have no idea what to do with:
> > License:(Artistic 2.0 or Artistic or LGPLv2) and (Artistic 2.0
27 matches
Mail list logo
