On čtvrtek 18. července 2024 3:48:30, SELČ Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Have you considered to submit an RFE for this "Extend All" feature?
> > I think this convenience button (or even with API, if reasonably easy to
> > implement) sounds like an acceptable compromise to
On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 07:58 +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> This broke dnf5 in ELN:
> nothing provides libfmt.so.10()(64bit) needed by
> libdnf5-plugin-actions-5.2.4.0-1.eln141.x86_64 from ELN-Extras
>
> Not sure where to report such ELN issues to, so, please, dispatch accordingly.
I guess the
On středa 17. července 2024 11:21:15, SELČ David Bold wrote:
> Adam Samalik wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 10:54, Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > On úterý 16. července 2024 15:22:56, SELČ Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:44 AM Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.
This broke dnf5 in ELN:
nothing provides libfmt.so.10()(64bit) needed by
libdnf5-plugin-actions-5.2.4.0-1.eln141.x86_64 from ELN-Extras
Not sure where to report such ELN issues to, so, please, dispatch accordingly.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 9:36 AM kefu chai wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> fmt 11.0.1 upd
Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Have you considered to submit an RFE for this "Extend All" feature?
> I think this convenience button (or even with API, if reasonably easy to
> implement) sounds like an acceptable compromise to me.
I remember having once suggested that on this mailing list and having
rece
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 7:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 17. 07. 24 22:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:41 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 17. 07. 24 v 6:41 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>
> >>> Done.
> >>
> >> Hi Mirek,
> >> I am a bit confused.
> >>
> >> I thought
On 17. 07. 24 22:15, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:41 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 17. 07. 24 v 6:41 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Done.
Hi Mirek,
I am a bit confused.
I thought there was a clear nonconsensus about the *GPL conversion [1] which resulted to
the FESCo ticket [
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PyTorch2.4
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-pytorch-2-4-self-contained/126069
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposal
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_2.0
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-lxqt-2-0-self-contained/126067
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fedora-repoquery_tool
Discussion Thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-fedora-repoquery-tool-self-contained/126066
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Chan
Hello folks,
Following a decision by FESCo[1] to move the mass branching date out by one
week for F41 to accommodate Flock, the remaining schedule has now been
altered by approx one week. The schedule[2] is up to date, and please note
some of the following key milestones:
- 13th August - Chan
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:41 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 17. 07. 24 v 6:41 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>
> > Done.
>
> Hi Mirek,
> I am a bit confused.
>
> I thought there was a clear nonconsensus about the *GPL conversion [1] which
> resulted to the FESCo ticket [2]. It is kinda surprising
Dne 17. 07. 24 v 6:41 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> Done.
Hi Mirek,
I am a bit confused.
I thought there was a clear nonconsensus about the *GPL conversion [1] which resulted to the FESCo ticket [2]. It is
kinda surprising to see the "Done." comment here and in the LGPL thread as well.
[1]
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 02:45:31PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 04:14:03AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > That said, it is not sufficient to reject adding Fedora downstream spyware.
> > Fedora also needs a policy that upstream "telemetry" spyware is not allowed
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 04:14:03AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> That said, it is not sufficient to reject adding Fedora downstream spyware.
> Fedora also needs a policy that upstream "telemetry" spyware is not allowed
> and needs to be disabled at compile time or patched out. We have se
Dne 15. 07. 24 v 11:22 Michal Srb napsal(a):
Hello,
po 15. 7. 2024 o 10:57 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
napísal(a):
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:39:37AM +0200, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> Hi Zbyszek,
>
> On 2024/07/14 20:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I'm loo
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-07-17-16.31.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-07-17/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-07-17-16.31.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedora
On 17. 07. 24 13:56, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 18. 06. 24 v 8:19 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
I am going to do the mass change of the license from AGPLv3 to AGPL-3.0-only
Done.
Hi Mirek,
I am a bit confused.
I thought there was a clear nonconsensus about the *GPL conversion [1] which
res
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:53:38PM -, Frank R Dana Jr. wrote:
> I do not envy you this work. The documentation fallout alone... a quick and
> dirty scan of only the man pages that happen to be *currently installed* on
> my F40 system reveals that 487 / 2673 man pages in section 8 contain the
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:25:23PM GMT, Daniel Frantes wrote:
> Hello,
> Daniel Frantes here. I want to help you with packaging one day.
> But I never done this, so I hope I will learn fast. If you guys have
> questions on me, post it in thread I will try to respond.
Welcome Daniel!
Take a look
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 09:19:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:51:28AM GMT, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:13 AM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 08:08 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:07:57
Hi,
dnf asked me to report this, but I have no idea where, so I am reporting
this here:
# dnf update
...
[MIRROR] kernel-modules-core-6.9.9-200.fc40.x86_64.rpm: Interrupted by
header callback: Inconsistent server data, reported file Content-Length:
22365761, repository metadata states file l
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 12:43:06PM GMT, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 7/16/24 12:18 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > php-symfony siwinski
> > php-symfony-psr-http-message-bridge siwinski
> > php-symfony3 remi, siwinski
>
> Can someone pick these up? I do not have any mo
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux 41 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on
2024-07-17 for Fedora 41. We are running this mass rebuild for the
changes listed in:
https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f41-rebuild) and merged
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:17 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> =
> # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
> =
>
> Meeting started by @salimma:fedora.im at 2024-07-16 17:00:25
>
>
>
> Meeting summary
> ---
> * TOPIC: Init Proc
Hello,
Daniel Frantes here. I want to help you with packaging one day.
But I never done this, so I hope I will learn fast. If you guys have questions
on me, post it in thread I will try to respond.
Greetings
Daniel Frantes
--
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 1:30 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:03:10PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 13:37 +0200, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > For packages I'm i
Dne 18. 06. 24 v 8:19 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
I am going to do the mass change of the license from AGPLv3 to AGPL-3.0-only
Done.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
___
devel mailing list -- de
Adam Samalik wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 10:54, Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com wrote:
> > On úterý 16. července 2024 15:22:56, SELČ Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:44 AM Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com
> > wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Do you suggest moving rawhide to branch
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 10:54, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On úterý 16. července 2024 15:22:56, SELČ Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:44 AM Pavel Raiskup
> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Do you suggest moving rawhide to branched, and start with a fresh
> (empty)
> > > rawhide ch
On úterý 16. července 2024 15:22:56, SELČ Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:44 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Do you suggest moving rawhide to branched, and start with a fresh (empty)
> > rawhide chroots for every branching?
>
> Yes, that was exactly what I was sugges
Dne 16. 06. 24 v 10:18 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
I am going to do the mass change of the license from LGPLv3+ to
LGPL-3.0-or-later
Done.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
___
devel mailing lis
32 matches
Mail list logo
