On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:02:28PM GMT, Mark E. Fuller via devel wrote:
> Yes, it won't build at all for some reason:
...snip...
The branch wasn't added propperly:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/63631
I asked it to retry (note, that anyone can do this, just add another
comme
Yes, it won't build at all for some reason:
➜ golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter git:(f40) fedpkg build
--target=f40-build-side-92523
Building golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter-1.0.0-1.fc40 for f40-build-side-92523
Created task: 120489481
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
* Chris Suszynski [11/07/2024 11:16] :
>
> What's the reason for treating Go differently than other languages?
> Fedora does not patch out calls to sites like npmjs.com, pypi.org,
> rubygems.org or repo.maven.apache.org, doesn't it?
Actually, we do.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dancer2
On Sun, 2024-07-14 at 12:29 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 7/13/24 4:39 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> >
> > if I don't like this functionality, can I have my vt consoles back
> > ?
> >
>
> It seems that you will need to compile your own kernel in order to do
> so.
>
"this is not about enablin
Hi Mark,
Koji doesn't show as part of that sidetag:
$ koji list-tagged --latest f40-build-side-92523
Build Tag Built by
golang-github-dominikbraun-graph-0.23.0-1.
Hi all,
I am adding a few new dependencies to update a golang package (nothing
new here) and building the new packages and update in a sidetag for F40.
However, for one of the new dependencies, there is a repeated error:
"FAILED: BuildError: package golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter not in list
Ian Pilcher writes:
> On 7/13/24 4:32 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> The idea for DRM_PANIC is nice, but I worry about the impact of disabling
> VT_CONSOLE. Plymouth is not used everywhere, e.g. what about cloud images
> and such? Also, w
CI for Bodhi updates has a bunch of tests like
fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional
fedora-ci.koji-build./plans/public.functional
that routinely fail. In fact, they are designed in a way where they
_must_ fail for many important packages: systemd, fedora-release,
coreutils, and anything else w
On 7/13/24 4:32 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
The idea for DRM_PANIC is nice, but I worry about the impact of disabling
VT_CONSOLE. Plymouth is not used everywhere, e.g. what about cloud images
and such? Also, when debugging boot troubles, removing 'rhb
On 7/13/24 4:39 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
if I don't like this functionality, can I have my vt consoles back ?
It seems that you will need to compile your own kernel in order to do
so.
--
If your user interface is intuit
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 03:23:56PM +0200, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
> > Cool!
> Thanks !
> > On page 40, 'cc_args =' is not going to work, that's a syntax error.
> > But a bigger problem is that there's no need to play with -O and -g
> > like that… Meson has builtin -D buildtype=… and it's beter to
Cool!
Thanks !
On page 40, 'cc_args =' is not going to work, that's a syntax error.
But a bigger problem is that there's no need to play with -O and -g
like that… Meson has builtin -D buildtype=… and it's beter to use that.
It also has built-in support e.g. for lto, so it's better to push user
t
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 12:20:57PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 09:49:45 GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Should we just put a huge redirect on whatcanidoforfedora to
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Welcome?
> >
> > I edited https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Welcome
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> That said, it is not sufficient to reject adding Fedora downstream
> spyware. Fedora also needs a policy that upstream "telemetry" spyware is
> not allowed and needs to be disabled at compile time or patched out. We
> have several packaged applications wanting to "ph
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 11:50:28AM +0200, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
> Hello,
> go figured but the past days have been intense for me (on the meson side of
> things),
> after your email I decided to give a look to meson, and then discovered
> something
> really interesting that pushed me to try and m
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240713.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240714.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 42
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.08 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 04:04:52PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 3:18 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 09:11:49AM GMT, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, one thing that we ALSO lost in the conversion to Matrix was that
> > > the minutes used
Hello,
go figured but the past days have been intense for me (on the meson side
of things),
after your email I decided to give a look to meson, and then discovered
something
really interesting that pushed me to try and move my project to meson,
to give it a try,
and then I figured that I could
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240714.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
19 matches
Mail list logo
