OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240626.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240628.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 17
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 256
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 6.14 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Rawhide 20240628.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 12:27:25PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > So what is the reason to not treat x86_64_v2 as different arch then
> > x86_64_v{1,3}. Why we keep having this discussion instead of fire one
> > more build? Users would need to
On Fri, 2024-06-28 at 09:42 +0200, Michal Konecny wrote:
> My assumption is that OpenID just checked the client_id server side and
> not the origin URL.
> I will need to check what are the posibilities in OIDC as it needs
> different redirect_uri for each instance as well. Maybe it could be
> de
Jan Kolarik writes:
>[...]
> The dnf-automatic command will still be available, now provided as a
> plugin and functionally compatible with dnf4. Although the
> configuration files' location has changed, it will be documented in
> the dnf4 vs. dnf5 changes documentation.
This configuration file
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:17 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2024-06-28 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
>
Due to a lack of agenda topics, today's meeting is CANCELED
--
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 1:32 PM Sandro wrote:
>
> On 28-06-2024 13:23, Christiano Anderson wrote:
> > I have orphaned the buildstream package some time ago, but I may not
> > have removed myself from the Bugzilla Assignee option.
> >
> > I am receiving outstanding request notifications related to
On 28-06-2024 13:23, Christiano Anderson wrote:
I have orphaned the buildstream package some time ago, but I may not
have removed myself from the Bugzilla Assignee option.
I am receiving outstanding request notifications related to this
package. I couldn't find a way to take myself off the Bug
Hello,
I have orphaned the buildstream package some time ago, but I may not
have removed myself from the Bugzilla Assignee option.
I am receiving outstanding request notifications related to this
package. I couldn't find a way to take myself off the Bugzilla Assignee.
Was there a step in th
My assumption is that OpenID just checked the client_id server side and
not the origin URL.
I will need to check what are the posibilities in OIDC as it needs
different redirect_uri for each instance as well. Maybe it could be
defined as template or regex in the definition. I'm not expert on
Ip
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 9:04 AM Michal Konecny wrote:
>
> I can see what is happening here, in OIDC we have entry only for
> lists.fedoraproject.org.
>
> I created a ticket on infra tracker for you
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12013, but I'm not sure
> how to solve this as the O
I can see what is happening here, in OIDC we have entry only for
lists.fedoraproject.org.
I created a ticket on infra tracker for you
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12013, but I'm not sure
how to solve this as the OIDC entry is shared between all instances and
it doesn't allow
12 matches
Mail list logo
