On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 7:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 25. 06. 24 22:50, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>
> >> Could you make the comment something like this?
> >>
> >> # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
> >> # TODO check if th
26. kesäkuuta 2024 2.20.19 GMT+03:00 "Miro Hrončok"
kirjoitti:
>On 25. 06. 24 22:50, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>>>
>>> Could you make the comment something like this?
>>>
>>> # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
>>> # TODO chec
On 25. 06. 24 22:50, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Could you make the comment something like this?
# Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
# TODO check if there are other licenses to be listed
License: GPL-2.0-only
We (the Change own
> *nod* would you mind add clean-rpm-gpg-pubkey to Fedora? Then I can simply
> call it.
Here's a package review request for it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294337
--
Peter Oliver
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 41 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
approximately in 5 weeks, i.e. around 2024-07-30.
Policy:
Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Could you make the comment something like this?
# Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
# TODO check if there are other licenses to be listed
License: GPL-2.0-only
We (the Change owners) discussed this on a meeting today. And
HI,
Development has effectively ended. For years Red Hat drove development for
its RHGS product, but with the EOL of RHGS at the end of 2024 [1], and the
disbanding of RHGS engineering at Red Hat, no development is being done.
The last update (11.1) was on 6 Nov., 2023. Little or no, development i
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 08:34:38AM GMT, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Пан, 24 чэр 2024, Gordon Messmer wrote:
...snip...
> > Is this work interesting? Should I continue working on it?
>
> Yes, it is definitely an interesting test. Thank you for investing your
> time and resources into this.
Yes,
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-06-25/fesco.2024-06-25-17.01.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-06-25/fesco.2024-06-25-17.01.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_m
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:47:34AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 24/06/2024 23:38, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > As I recall from a previous query, there are
> > (around) 90 active proven packagers (and
> > ~250 total who were in the PP group).
>
> I think most privacy/security focused
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:22 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
> I would prefer this one since I can use open source applications to
> generate these codes. I can't find any FIDO2 implementations that are
> completely open source which doesn't require proprietary technologies
> like TPM or SGX.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to
> > provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some
> > form of legally-binding assertion that
Planned Outage - mailman - 2024-06-27 10:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2024-06-27 10:00 UTC
which will last approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-06-27 10:00UTC'
Reason fo
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 16:21 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to
> > provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some
> > form of legally-binding assertion that
On Аўт, 25 чэр 2024, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to
provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some
form of legally-binding assertion that we weren't sending out
ma
On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to
provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some
form of legally-binding assertion that we weren't sending out
malicious devices.
Who can guarantee that these device
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 4:48 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 24/06/2024 23:38, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > As I recall from a previous query, there are
> > (around) 90 active proven packagers (and
> > ~250 total who were in the PP group).
>
> I think most privacy/security focused develope
Am 24.06.24 um 22:29 schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 21:09 +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
Am 24.06.24 um 20:14 schrieb Tom Hughes via devel:
On 24/06/2024 18:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Not really an issue if you have GSSAPI set up on your system. Such as
by installing fedora
On 21. 06. 24 8:30, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
What I can do is to put a comment above the license:
# Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
License: GPL-2.0-only
Could you make the comment something like this?
# Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
# TODO check if there
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240624.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240625.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 139
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 10.95 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Dne 25. 06. 24 v 12:10 Dan Horák napsal(a):
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:57:49 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 24. 06. 24 v 20:03 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:57:49 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 24. 06. 24 v 20:03 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
> >>> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> So what is t
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:29 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 17/06/24 07:15, zebo...@gmail.com ha scritto:
>
> This is still in progress in f41-build-side-91095
>
> ```todotxt sort:priority:desc sort:status:asc
> x calligra
> x darktable
> digikam
> x exiv2
> geeqie
> gegl04
> x gerbera
>
Dne 24. 06. 24 v 20:03 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
So what is the reason to not treat x86_64_v2 as different arch then
x86_64_v{1,3}. Why we kee
Please note that the MEETING HAS BEEN MOVED 22 h later.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
d
Hi all,
There were some minor license changes and / or corrections in recently
updated packages for Rust crates:
- databake / databake-derive: corrected from Unicode-DFS-2016 to Unicode-3.0
- enum-iterator / enum-iterator-derive: relicensed from MIT to 0BSD by upstream
The databake crate is a bu
Hi everyone!
I'm a maintainer of xmlsec library.
The xmlsec library has a plugin system that implements the actual crypto
operation. Those implementations/plugins are provided as xmlsec
subpackages.
As Fedora is moving away from gcrypt, I will deprecate and stop shipping
xmlsec1-gcrypt. Unfortun
On 24/06/2024 23:38, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
As I recall from a previous query, there are
(around) 90 active proven packagers (and
~250 total who were in the PP group).
I think most privacy/security focused developers/maintainers won't plug
USB tokens they get from random people on the Internet
28 matches
Mail list logo
