On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:51 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> If you mean Extended Page Table here
Yes, I used a shorthand term, since I am apparently
too steeped in the architectural details.
> I don't know any way to tell if my Cedar View Atom D2550 CPU from 2012
> supports it or n
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:33 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 19/06/2024 19:45, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
> > Unless the private key is off-system, anything will be able to be loaded
> > without much fuss.
>
> Maybe akmods can be updated to use the private ke
> On 13/05/2024 00:58, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> The gimp package should be updated to 3.0, and the existing 2.x version
> should move to the gimp2 compatibility package.
I'm inclined to agree, not JUST because it makes sense from an update
perspective, but because it's the EXACT example used in
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 3:25 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> The first program run from memory was exeucted on 21. June 2024
1948 :)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
Dne 21. 06. 24 v 11:55 dop. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
+1 for continuing the (imperfect) convertion to SPDX.
Note that current phase is the last one. Before "Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline" (that is 2024-08-20) I
plan to file Bugzillas for all remaining non-converte
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> So what is the reason to not treat x86_64_v2 as different arch then
> x86_64_v{1,3}. Why we keep having this discussion instead of fire one
> more build? Users would need to choose v1 / v2 / v3 ISO but what else?
>
>
I can think of three pro
On 21-06-2024 16:41, Sandro wrote:
On my F39 system:
$ repoquery -q --cache --provides /usr/share/fonts/unifont/unifont.ttf
font(unifont)
font(unifontupper)
metainfo()
metainfo(unifont.metainfo.xml)
unifont-ttf-fonts = 15.0.01-3.fc39
I will be changing the BR to `font(unifont)` and do the same
I've orphaned libguess.
It's last known API user doesn't require it anymore for some time.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://doc
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 8:20 PM Sandro wrote:
> On 21-06-2024 16:11, Parag Nemade wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 6:12 PM Sandro wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Looking into flare-engine failing to build from source, I encountered
> >> two issues with font packages:
> >>
> >> 1. Pat
On 21-06-2024 16:11, Parag Nemade wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 6:12 PM Sandro wrote:
Hi,
Looking into flare-engine failing to build from source, I encountered
two issues with font packages:
1. Path change in liberation-sans-fonts
2. Name change of subpkg for unifont
The first appeare
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 6:12 PM Sandro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking into flare-engine failing to build from source, I encountered
> two issues with font packages:
>
> 1. Path change in liberation-sans-fonts
> 2. Name change of subpkg for unifont
>
> The first appeared trivial. The path to the fo
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:34:26AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> it's this time of the year, we should do some major filesystem surgery!
>
> The preparations for
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin have been
> put in place and I want to do the r
El vie., 21 jun. 2024 14:42, Sandro escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Looking into flare-engine failing to build from source, I encountered
> two issues with font packages:
>
> 1. Path change in liberation-sans-fonts
> 2. Name change of subpkg for unifont
>
> The first appeared trivial. The path to the fonts w
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240620.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240621.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 78
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 29.60 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Hi,
Looking into flare-engine failing to build from source, I encountered
two issues with font packages:
1. Path change in liberation-sans-fonts
2. Name change of subpkg for unifont
The first appeared trivial. The path to the fonts was changed from
`/usr/share/fonts/liberation-sans` to
`/us
On Friday, 21 June 2024 at 01:47, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:39 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
[...]
> I will also note that since that -v1 desktop/laptop
> systems of the legacy architecture do not support
> EPT,
If you mean Extended Page Table here, then Wikipedia[1] says it was
i
On Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 19:50, Guinevere Larsen wrote:
> On 6/20/24 2:27 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:52 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> > > > Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> > > > > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hard
Dne 12. 06. 24 v 19:14 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 4:00 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:55 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:51:34AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:41 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
IOW,
On Friday, 21 June 2024 at 09:24, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hot news:
>
> I sent lots of announces about automatic migrations. Miro Hrončok raised a
> question. Feel free to join the discussion. Either here on legal ML.
>
> Scancode-toolkit (very powerfull license scanner) and all its dependencie
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:24:44AM -0600, Jilayne Lovejoy wrote:
> On 6/19/24 6:07 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > Relatedly, I have had some misgivings and mixed feelings about these
> > mass conversions, because I have worried that the resulting situation
> > will make people complacent regarding
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:47 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 19. 06. 24 23:32, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 19. 06. 24 v 5:58 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> >>
> >> How do you know the License tag is not supposed to be e.g. "GPL-2.0-only
> >> AND
> >> MIT" or similar?
> >>
> >> Converting "GPLv2"
Hot news:
I sent lots of announces about automatic migrations. Miro Hrončok raised a question. Feel free to join the discussion.
Either here on legal ML.
Scancode-toolkit (very powerfull license scanner) and all its dependencies passed all Package Reviews and is heading
to rawhide. Thank yo
22 matches
Mail list logo
