On Thu, 16 May 2024 16:56:37 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
> from the packager group.
>
>
> More details available in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11901
>
> Packages that have been orphaned are:
>
> rpms/xarchive
Thank you, I confirmed it is fixed now!!
$ podman run --rm quay.io/fedora/fedora:40 sh -c 'type findmnt; rpm -q
util-linux-core'
findmnt is /usr/bin/findmnt
util-linux-core-2.40.1-1.fc40.x86_64
Manabu Ori
2024年5月17日(金) 6:25 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:43:42PM GMT, Manabu Or
On 5/15/24 12:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 15/05/2024 10:52, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
What if I don't use GNOME search? I don't use the GNOME desktop, so I
don't want to have a random Firefox process running on my machine that
is doing absolutely nothing and just hogging resourc
On 5/16/24 16:10, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 16. 05. 24 v 14:28 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
Proper solution is actually minimazing content of the minimal build root
Most of the packages in the buildroot are libraries, pulled i
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240514.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240516.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 29
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 171
Downgraded packages: 4
Size of added packages: 44.10 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:27:31PM GMT, Tim Orling wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
> > from the packager group.
> >
> > This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
> > ht
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
> from the packager group.
>
> This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
I
Hi all,
Today, 2024-05-16, we have removed inactive packagers
from the packager group.
This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
If the removed user is 'main admin' for a package, this package
will
Hi everyone,
We are moving Fedora Planet from the old (python2) software running on
fedorapeople.org to a new application that is running in OpenShift.
This new application uses information from the Fedora Account System to
find blogs, so please make sure your account is updated.
You can see the
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:43:42PM GMT, Manabu Ori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found fedora:40 container image does not contain util-linux-core.
> Is it intentional?
I don't think so...
> I'd like some commands (findmnt in my case) included in the base image...
>
>
> ## fedora:39 container image has fi
Neal Gompa wrote:
> I have the question of why is dnf5 running as if "--allow-erasing" is
> always passed to it? Older versions of DNF explicitly didn't do that
> because we get weird behaviors like this.
Without --allow-erasing (which was actually passed explicitly, as Petr Pisar
pointed out), t
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Patch and source numbers start from zero, that goes for automatically
> numbered patches too. So there's an off by one in the application, and
> the latter %autopatch which is supposed to apply patches >= 2 simply has
> nothing to do, and falls through silently. That's a bu
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:47 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:43 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > Do you think that's worth a separate Change from the Node.js 22 Change
> > I already filed? I can amend that (and ask FESCo to re-vote based on
> > new information).
>
> I
Dne 16. 05. 24 v 14:28 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
Proper solution is actually minimazing content of the minimal build root
Most of the packages in the buildroot are libraries, pulled in via
dependencies.
@buildsys-build g
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Proper solution is actually minimazing content of the minimal build root
Most of the packages in the buildroot are libraries, pulled in via
dependencies.
@buildsys-build group is:
Mandatory packages : bash # basic shell env
On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> 1. Suitability for dist-git and src.fedoraproject.org replacement
Can someone explain me what is the problem of pagure ?
please join to
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/2024-git-forge-evaluation/111795/20
Thanks
--
Sérgio M. B.
-
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:30 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> So, if you have a specific use case or workflow, share it with us in
> the form of a user story in this ticket[6], or consider joining the
> ARC team for this investigation.
>
Tomas, the email title and the referenced ticket only talk about "g
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2024-05-17 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10568/
--
___
devel ma
V Thu, May 16, 2024 at 04:29:21AM -0600, Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:10 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 9:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've been trying to get 'add-determinism' deployed in buildroots. This
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:09:01AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> This looks like you're putting the resolver between a rock and a hard
> place. :thinking:
> I don't think I've ever seen packages being *removed* when installing
> BuildRequires on top of the minimal buildroot ...
>
> Would it be p
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:10 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 9:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying to get 'add-determinism' deployed in buildroots. This
> > has been unsuccessful because of the following issue.
> >
> > The dependen
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 9:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to get 'add-determinism' deployed in buildroots. This
> has been unsuccessful because of the following issue.
>
> The dependency chain is:
> redhat-rpm-config has
> Requires build-reproducibility-srpm
Hi,
I've been trying to get 'add-determinism' deployed in buildroots. This
has been unsuccessful because of the following issue.
The dependency chain is:
redhat-rpm-config has
Requires build-reproducibility-srpm-macros
and build-reproducibility-srpm-macros has
Requires:(add-determinism if
23 matches
Mail list logo
