On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 02:15:20PM GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
> hiredis 1.2.0 has been out a long while now, and with some prodding I am
> finally looking at updating rawhide to it.
>
> A interested user ran a mass prebuild:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/v02460/hiredis-1.
Adam Williamson wrote:
> The shortest syntax is just to use Patch: foo.patch , and %autosetup .
That is not a syntax to apply a patch, it is an automagic that blindly
applies all patches in numeric order. Cannot reorder patches, cannot apply
them conditionally (e.g., based on the 0%{?fedora} ver
Dne 10. 05. 24 v 11:47 odp. Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a):
Unless the BZs force a package to be
updated you may very well end up with
~20% of the Fedora packages nearly
forever not being updated with proper
SPDX licenses as they are as likely or
not going to be forever be on re-build
auto-pilot (than
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240510.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240511.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 25
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 318.57 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:28:07PM +0200, Florian Festi wrote:
> Anyone interested in picking this up? I remember quite a few people
> being exited about this when it was announced with the rpm-4.19 Change.
I would be interested in making this happen.
You mentioned that the transition "requires s
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:13:53PM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
> My idea is to split systemtap-sdt-devel into two packages: one with all the
> content but without the python script (/usr/bin/dtrace) and a new one
> containing only the mentioned script.
+1
I think it's weird that a user program (/us
