Dne 03. 03. 24 v 20:22 Philippe Ombredanne napsal(a):
It is mostly based on google/licenseclassifier which had a single
commit in the last 17 months, and this means this is not more
maintained than askalono (and frankly both are fairly lightweight
tools for license detection). Trivy adds SPDX exp
OLD: Fedora-40-20240302.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240303.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 3
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240302.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240303.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 743.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages
I plan to update libunibreak to version 6.1 in rawhide and F40 in about
a week.
This update comes with an soname bump. The following packages depend on
libunibreak:
fedrq wrsrc -Xs libunibreak -F name
coolreader
fbreader
krita
naev
I ran a smoke test in Copr [1] rebuilding those packages aga
Hi Maxwell:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, Maxwell G wrote:
> Has anyone every used trivy [1] to scan for licenses? It appears more
> robust and better maintained than askalono-cli and can detect files with
> multiple licenses and licenses embedded in file headers. I have been
> running it with "trivy fs
On Sun Mar 3, 2024 at 17:28 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 03. 03. 24 v 7:35 Maxwell G napsal(a):
> >
> > Has anyone every used trivy [1] to scan for licenses? It appears more
> > robust and better maintained than askalono-cli
> > and can detect files with multiple licenses and licenses embed
Dne 03. 03. 24 v 7:35 Maxwell G napsal(a):
Has anyone every used trivy [1] to scan for licenses? It appears more robust and better maintained than askalono-cli
and can detect files with multiple licenses and licenses embedded in file headers. I have been running it with "trivy
fs --scanners l
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 10:55:54AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 03. 24 23:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 10:16:02PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>On 02. 03. 24 11:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 10:00:20AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
On 02. 03. 24 23:28, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 10:16:02PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 02. 03. 24 11:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 10:00:20AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 11:49:06AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
We were
