Packit Workshop 1st Edition 2024
We, the packit team, are happy to invite you to our upcoming workshop about
pulling upstream releases to Fedora using Packit.
When: Wed, Mar 13, 9:30 AM - Wed, Mar 13, 12:30 PM (GMT+1)
Where: Online!
How: Join us as soon as you can on www.gather.town (more detai
Going purely by upstream support status, yes, GConf2 should be retired;
it’s been obsolete for a decade.
Going by dependent packages, it’s not so simple. Some of these
dependencies are no doubt spurious, optional, or otherwise “removable;”
others are real hard dependencies from outdated-but-st
Hi all,
Today's an important day on the Fedora Linux f40 schedule [1], with
several significant cut-offs. First of all, today is the Bodhi
updates-testing activation point [2]. That means that from now all
Fedora Linux 40 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass
the relevant requirem
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 2:16 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/commit/ed5ba266c61e01a52359b5793a627e7c9aae8854
>
> Why wasn't this a Fedora change proposal?
>
> Also the justification given for such a major change is very thin.
> I'm sure product securi
Dne 26. 02. 24 v 15:51 Richard Hughes napsal(a):
If the SPDX listing isn't using src.fedoraproject.org and instead
using something like bugzilla please yell. Being listed as maintaining
all those also makes the packager-dashboard basically useless for me
too. 🙂
I am using a script:
https://pag
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/commit/ed5ba266c61e01a52359b5793a627e7c9aae8854
>
> Why wasn't this a Fedora change proposal?
>
> Also the justification given for such a major change is very thin.
> I'm sure product security can give us so
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/commit/ed5ba266c61e01a52359b5793a627e7c9aae8854
Why wasn't this a Fedora change proposal?
Also the justification given for such a major change is very thin.
I'm sure product security can give us some more details of precisely
what exploits will be miti
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:51:34PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > * 23711 spec files in Fedora
>
> I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found
> that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like
> https://src.fedorapro
OLD: Fedora-40-20240226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 119
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 91.70 MiB
Size of dropped packages:38.34 KiB
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 7:21 PM Jerry James wrote:
> The Rawhide side tag is being merged into Rawhide now. The F40 builds
> have hit an unfortunate snag and have not progressed far. If anybody
> from releng is reading this, I need
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11977 processed before I can ma
All that said, I have filed:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11799
for us to investigate why it's not properly disabling the unresponsive
nodes and look into the underlying unresponsiveness issue.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
__
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:52 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking into mock configs, and mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39 still lists
> for rawhide buildroots, repositories called rawhide-modular,
> rawhide-modular-debuginfo, rawhide-modular-source, with enabled=0.
>
> Thos
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 09:44, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > I wonder if you have it from a group you are in or if it was the general
> creep of time that has added you to a lot of packages?
>
> I'm a packager and a provenpackager, so I'm a bit c
Hi,
I was looking into mock configs, and mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39 still lists
for rawhide buildroots, repositories called rawhide-modular,
rawhide-modular-debuginfo, rawhide-modular-source, with enabled=0.
Those urls lead to content like
http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/fedora/linux/de
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I wonder if you have it from a group you are in or if it was the general
> creep of time that has added you to a lot of packages?
I'm a packager and a provenpackager, so I'm a bit confused why I'm on
so many packages as a separate committer.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240225.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 190
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 63.39 MiB
Size of dropped packages
16 matches
Mail list logo
