I'm re-posting to @devel as I forgot that posting to @devel-announce is
restricted:
In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you
can
I get the following output:
--
sudo dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 11:17 AM Michel Lind
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:53:38PM +, Christopher Klooz wrote:
> > On 14/02/2024 17.35, Michel Lind wrote:
> > > As a pandoc user, I'm happy to help with any reviews. Is there a list
> > > where this tends to get posted, apart from devel?
On 2/16/24 16:58, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 2/16/24 01:29, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Am Fr., 16. Feb. 2024 um 07:15 Uhr schrieb Elliott Sales de Andrade
:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:39 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
We're hitting this with h5py on i686:
/builddir/build/BUILD/h5py-3.10.0/serial/h5
I don't see any info googling it.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Gu
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 12:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
>
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
>
No errors
I have my dnf configured with installonly_limit=6 and now and then find
it useful to get rid of old kernels (for example after a move from
Fedora n to n+1).
I know in the early days of DNF5 you couldn't do this, but can you do it
now?
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydne
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 7:12 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
No problems experienced on my primary desktop.
Thanks!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 5:50 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:11:49AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
From the Fedora systems I have immediate access to:
Well-used F39 Workstation:
Problem: problem with installed package blender-1:4.0.2-1.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 6:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 12:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>>
>> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
>> try to run:
>>
>> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
>> # next time yo
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 12:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> # This is
On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 08:11 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && ec
Greetings. After the outage that just completed, koji has been upgraded
to 1.34.0 plus a few patches from upstream. Some highlights:
* The scheduler has been redone completely, hopefully this will allow
for more complex scheduling adjustments. In the mean time it should be
pretty similar from the
On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 2:11:49 AM EST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/d
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:41:22PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:38:20PM -, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> > Ubuntu already has a sever risc-v iso. Thoughts?
>
> It's planned ... Join us on #fedora-riscv.
I should say if you just want a disk image right now then
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:38:20PM -, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> Ubuntu already has a sever risc-v iso. Thoughts?
It's planned ... Join us on #fedora-riscv.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
Ubuntu already has a sever risc-v iso. Thoughts?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-c
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package
telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc39.x86_64
- telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not
belong to a distupgrade repository
- nothing provides qt6-qtbase(x86-64) = 6.6.1 needed by
telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfu
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 07:37 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> I'd like to use NFLOG to log firewall drops (so that the kernel
> message
> log isn't spammed by them), but it doesn't appear there's anything
> currently in Fedora that can read that other than "tcpdump -i nflog".
> It looks like ulogd was re
Hi,
I'd like to unretire ulogd (aka ulogd2).
Please see the re-review bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2265387
Thank you,
Thomas
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to d
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-02-21/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-02-21-16.34.log.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-02-21/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-02-21-16.34.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fe
Dne 21. 02. 24 v 18:34 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
But I am afraid I am customizing the file
/etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg . It's not the original one from
the RPM any more.
I should use the original one and it's better to manage my own custom
setting in the `~/.config/mock.cfg`?
Yes
Le 21/02/2024 à 08:11, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
> sudo dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
Erreur :
Problème 1: problème av
> That said, DNF3 should work too. But instead of hunting this bug it may be
> easier to update configs and use DNF5 that should be used anyway.
As my mock-core-configs RPM version is below, I got the same version's
RPM from the koji build link below, and plan to recover the files in
the /etc/moc
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 12:38, Jun Aruga (he / him)
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:09 PM Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 12:05, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
> >>
> >> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --s
On Wed, Feb 21 2024 at 05:38:00 PM +01:00:00, Jun Aruga (he / him)
wrote:
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol:
g_once_init_enter_pointer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265336
This means dnf was built against a newer version of glib than is
available at runtime. Li
Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_
On 21. 02. 24 17:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
(Side note: This should now be fixed)
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:09 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 12:05, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>> Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
>>
>> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
>>
>>
>>
>> --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dn
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:05 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
>
> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
>
>
>
> --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3
> --disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build
>
> This is
On 2/21/24 11:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:34:37AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I am getting an error "template-id not allowed for constructor in C++20" but
according to the Copr log [0], the compiler is being given -std=c++17:
It is a warning, but you've asked for
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 12:05, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
>
> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
>
>
>
> --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3
> --disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build
>
> This is sus
Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3
--disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build
This is suspicious. It should use DNF5 now.
What is
rpm-qf/etc/mock/fedora-ra
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:34:37AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I am getting an error "template-id not allowed for constructor in C++20" but
> according to the Copr log [0], the compiler is being given -std=c++17:
It is a warning, but you've asked for all warnings to be errors, right?
As docum
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
> aliases are currently broken
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
(Side note: This should now be fixed)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PG
Hello,
I faced the following error by running the mock for Fedora rawhide on
my Fedora 39 local environment.
Anyone, do you know how to avoid this error? Thanks for your help.
I filed this issue to the Bugzilla ticket below.
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol: g_once_init_enter_po
I am getting an error "template-id not allowed for constructor in C++20" but
according to the Copr log [0], the compiler is being given -std=c++17:
Building CXX object
thirdparty/clipper2/CMakeFiles/clipper2.dir/Clipper2Lib/src/clipper.engine.cpp.o
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/kicad-7.0.11/redhat-l
OLD: Fedora-40-20240220.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240221.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 109
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 21.60 MiB
Size of dropped packages:319.35 KiB
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
---
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40 approxim
V Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:54:16AM +0100, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> Assume I have two "stacks" of RPM packages available:
>
> postgresql16
> provides postgresql-any version 16
> conflicts with other postgresql-any
> postgresql16-plugin
> provides postgresql-any-plugin
> requires postgresql1
Am 20.02.24 um 15:25 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski:
Some quick nitpicks for your spec:
I think I've addressed everything [1], thank you very much for taking
the time! :) I'll keep the default->sysconfig switch, though—it's a
one-line patch anyway. The change was motivated by an old t
Miroslav Suchý wrote on Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:11:49AM +0100:
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
Error:
Problem 1
What is missing?
> Other then some missing RPMFusion packages
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pro
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:28 PM hhlp wrote:
> Error:
>
> Problem: problem with installed package
> gnome-shell-extension-pop-shell-1.2.0^21.aafc945-1.fc39.noarch
> - package gnome-shell-extension-pop-shell-1.2.0^21.aafc945-3.fc40.noarch
> from fedora requires (gnome-shell >= 45~ with gnome-she
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:07 PM hhlp wrote:
> al good as always good work only add --allowerasing in my case
>
Please don't add --allowerasing when doing this test because it hides the
issues that we are interested in.
--
Kalev
--
___
devel mailing
al good as always good work only add --allowerasing in my case
Installing weak dependencies:
boost-numpy3 x86_64 1.83.0-3.fc40 fedora 30 k
cups-filters-driverless x86_64 1:2.0.0-6.fc40 fedora 29 k
gnome-software-fedora-langpacks x86_64 46~beta-1.fc40 fedora 24
Hello.
Assume I have two "stacks" of RPM packages available:
postgresql16
provides postgresql-any version 16
conflicts with other postgresql-any
postgresql16-plugin
provides postgresql-any-plugin
requires postgresql16
conflicts with other postgresql-any-plugin
postgresql20
provides
I just found that my visidata issue is likely being handled via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264975
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265038
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/285
--
___
devel m
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:24 ago on Wed Feb 21 10:16:20 2024.
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package visidata-2.11.1-2.fc39.noarch
- visidata-2.11.1-2.fc39.noarch from @System does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- nothing provides /usr/bin/-S needed by visidata-
Other then some missing RPMFusion packages
Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 09:13 skrev Luna Jernberg :
>
> Worked good on my Thinkpad Edge laptop some weeks ago
>
> Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 08:12 skrev Miroslav Suchý :
> >
> > Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > an
Worked good on my Thinkpad Edge laptop some weeks ago
Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 08:12 skrev Miroslav Suchý :
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command def
52 matches
Mail list logo
