I’m not aware of anything in grpc that would require re2 to be held
back. If there is, I’d hope it could be resolved.
An impact check in COPR would be wise for any update.
I’ve CC’d the appropriate aliases to make sure *all* of the maintainers
of the re2 and python-fb-re2 packages are aware of
On Tuesday, 30 January 2024 08:07:25 EST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:47:44PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Link to the FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3165
> >
> > and I'm very upset
>
> Assume best intent first of all.
I quit trying to use Wayland a long
Hi All,
The bmake-based mk-configure package review is completed.
Could someone please review libmaa? It is a C language one.
Thank you,
Carlos R.F.
On 1/13/24 12:10, Carlos Rodriguez Fernandez wrote:
Hi All,
I posted two new packages for review. Feedback is highly appreciated :)
mk-confi
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:30 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Major Hayden said:
> > > Stephen Gallagher pointed out that ELN doesn't have busybox, but it does
> > > have dhcpcd, and that should work fine. I've reverted the switch to
> > >
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:30 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Major Hayden said:
> > Stephen Gallagher pointed out that ELN doesn't have busybox, but it does
> > have dhcpcd, and that should work fine. I've reverted the switch to udhcpcd
> > and I'm waiting on upstream cloud-init to h
Once upon a time, Major Hayden said:
> Stephen Gallagher pointed out that ELN doesn't have busybox, but it does have
> dhcpcd, and that should work fine. I've reverted the switch to udhcpcd and
> I'm waiting on upstream cloud-init to have a new release with the recently
> added dhcpcd support.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024, at 13:56, Petr Menšík wrote:
> I think this is stupid anyway. Why does cloud-init need 2 separate DHCP
> clients anyway? Can we gather what exactly they use it for and why
> alternative dhcp client is required?
It looks like a small, basic, DHCP client is needed during the e
Hello Major,
I think this is stupid anyway. Why does cloud-init need 2 separate DHCP
clients anyway? Can we gather what exactly they use it for and why
alternative dhcp client is required?
It seems to me NetworkManager should be able to use just different
configuration for "pre-connection" p
Hi,
At $dayjob we are running into issues with re2 and python bindings.
Fedora has a fairly old version of re2 with so.9 while upstream is at
so.11. Is there a reason for this? If it is just time, I'd like to
help bumping the package in rawhide.
Originally, facebook creating python bindings fo
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:30 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:48 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I will start a mass rebuild in a s
Il 06/02/24 14:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 06:47:21PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> That said, I'd like to make a request and maybe make all reviewers aware
>> of a feature which was implemented some time ago. I've noticed many
>> reviewers change
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:48 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal
> > > is
> > > finish and merge it before
V Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:34:54PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 06:47:21PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > That said, I'd like to make a request and maybe make all reviewers aware
> > of a feature which was implemented some time ago. I've noticed
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:12 AM Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody seen this error before:
> FEDORA-2024-310c0537ac ejected from the push because "Cannot find
> relevant tag for gromacs-2023.4-1.fc39. None of ['f39-updates',
> 'f39-updates-pending'] are in ['epel9-next-testing', 'epe
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:42 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:11:55 +0100
> Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> >
> > On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100,
Submitted as https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-7ffec7b81f
.
Krita is FTI now in koji local repository due to mlt being FTBFS and FTI,
I'll resolve that once gcc gets fixed not to ICE during mlt build (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113205 ).
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
> > > Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1].
> > > Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide s
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 15:43 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1].
> > Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't
> > touch
> > them .
> >
>
>
> mlt is now FTI, do y
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:50 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Mass rebuild finished and merge to rawhide [1].
> Packages player and MLT are already FTBFS on Rawhide so I didn't touch
> them .
mlt is now FTI, do you plan to introduce opencv-compat to resolve that?
--
Best regards / S pozdravem,
Fran
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 08:27:33AM -0600, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I'm happy to pass the project off to whomever needs it, if you give me the
> user name and a quick reference. Or retire it, if you have a link with
> instructions on how to do that.
It should not require more than the first step in
Yeah, it's a different room. The active one is :fedoraproject.org (I
think that's the case for all matrix rooms), and both of them are
unencrypted, so you can see the full history. Cya there :).
Sorry for hijacking this thread as well
On 2024/02/06 14:48, Sandro wrote:
On 06-02-2024 14:43, Cr
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:12 PM Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody seen this error before:
> FEDORA-2024-310c0537ac ejected from the push because "Cannot find
> relevant tag for gromacs-2023.4-1.fc39. None of ['f39-updates',
> 'f39-updates-pending'] are in ['epel9-next-testing', 'epe
On 06-02-2024 14:43, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
Are you using IRC? The IRC bridge is dead I think around that time. You
might have to use a proper matrix client in this case.
I joined the Matrix room (https://matrix.to/#/#fedora-ci:fedora.im).
We are active even yesterday.
Then I somehow
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm going to guess this will introduce a dependency on the exact
> version of GCC (major only? or major.minor? not sure). Just like
> annobin. Which might require that this package is rebuilt when GCC is
> rebuilt (only major? or all rebuilds? again, don't know).
See
Are you using IRC? The IRC bridge is dead I think around that time. You
might have to use a proper matrix client in this case.
We are active even yesterday.
On 2024/02/06 14:38, Sandro wrote:
On 06-02-2024 14:27, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
Can join the #fedora-ci:fedoraproject.org matrix gr
On 06-02-2024 14:27, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 14:18, Sandro wrote:
On 06-02-2024 10:32, Karolina Surma wrote:
Please note, if you want to add hundreds of packages at once, coordinate
with the Zuul folks -- they know best how much it can handle.
Do you happen to have cont
On 06-02-2024 14:27, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
Can join the #fedora-ci:fedoraproject.org matrix group.
I did. Not much activity there though. The last message (before mine)
dates back to July 25, 2023.
Thanks for the pointer nonetheless.
-- Sandro
--
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 06:47:21PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> That said, I'd like to make a request and maybe make all reviewers aware
> of a feature which was implemented some time ago. I've noticed many
> reviewers change the ticket status from ASSIGNED to POST when they flag
> the
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 14:18, Sandro wrote:
>
> On 06-02-2024 10:32, Karolina Surma wrote:
> > Please note, if you want to add hundreds of packages at once, coordinate
> > with the Zuul folks -- they know best how much it can handle.
>
> Do you happen to have contact details or a pointer to them?
>
Can join the #fedora-ci:fedoraproject.org matrix group.
On 2024/02/06 14:16, Sandro wrote:
On 06-02-2024 10:32, Karolina Surma wrote:
Please note, if you want to add hundreds of packages at once,
coordinate with the Zuul folks -- they know best how much it can handle.
Do you happen to have co
On 2/3/24 22:11, pgnd wrote:
Is there a way to see what gaps remain, which ones are being worked on, and
which ones
will be declared "not a gap - won't fix"?
I have a list of things I'm tracking. I've been reluctant to publish
it because people will think that it's some kind of "general Wayla
On 06-02-2024 10:32, Karolina Surma wrote:
Please note, if you want to add hundreds of packages at once, coordinate
with the Zuul folks -- they know best how much it can handle.
Do you happen to have contact details or a pointer to them?
I have an issue with Zuul (not related to adding package
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:46:28PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113035034
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262539
> >
> > The new AFL++ (American Fuzzy Lop, a fuzzing tool) in Rawhide appears
> >
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240205.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240206.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 166
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 427.63 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:50:14PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 12:38:31PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Not sure if it helps but it seems these source files implement the
> > plugin:
> >
> > https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/blob/stable/instrumentation/afl
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 12:38:31PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Not sure if it helps but it seems these source files implement the
> plugin:
>
> https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/blob/stable/instrumentation/afl-gcc-cmplog-pass.so.cc
> https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/blob/
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 20:36 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 19:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will start a mass rebuild in a side-tag, very soon , the goal is
> > finish and merge it before branch of Fedora 40, please let me know
> > we
> > have any thing that p
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113035034
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262539
>
> The new AFL++ (American Fuzzy Lop, a fuzzing tool) in Rawhide appears
> to be building a GCC plugin, contained in one or all of these newly
> added f
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:11:55 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> could someone in the mingw te
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:23:48PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:54:23AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113035034
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262539
> >
> > The new AFL++ (American Fuzzy L
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:54:23AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113035034
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262539
>
> The new AFL++ (American Fuzzy Lop, a fuzzing tool) in Rawhide appears
> to be building a GCC plugin, con
On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Hi,
could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please
see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then t
On Tuesday, 06 February 2024 at 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113035034
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262539
>
> The new AFL++ (American Fuzzy Lop, a fuzzing tool) in Rawhide appears
> to be building a GCC plugin, contai
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113035034
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262539
The new AFL++ (American Fuzzy Lop, a fuzzing tool) in Rawhide appears
to be building a GCC plugin, contained in one or all of these newly
added files:
%global afl_helper_path %{
On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 19:11 -0700, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody seen this error before:
> FEDORA-2024-310c0537ac ejected from the push because "Cannot find
> relevant tag for gromacs-2023.4-1.fc39. None of ['f39-updates',
> 'f39-updates-pending'] are in ['epel9-next-testing', 'e
V Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 07:00:28PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
> - There should be no more Updates ejected from the composes that remain
> stuck in pending state due to wrong tags applied to their builds (or,
> better, they should be automatically pushed again after 48 hours)
> - The
Hello,
ever wanted to add Zuul CI to your Fedora packages in dist-git but then
got discouraged by having to edit the yaml file[0] manually?
I created zuul-config-generator[1], a small script to find all the given
username's or group's packages and generate `fedora-distgits.yaml` with
them in
47 matches
Mail list logo
