Hot news:
We added new license LicenseRef-Fedora-Firmware that we use for firmware that does not have clear license declarations
and only "Redistributable..."-like declarations.
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/merge_requests/460/diffs
The process of adding the licenses on
Hi Frank!
This is awesome!
I can review your PR because ProcDump is not so friendly in systems
that are rpm based.
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:49 PM Frank R Dana Jr. wrote:
>
> I just submitted that PR I mentioned, to support use of a system libbpf
> instead of immediately diving into ExternalPro
I just submitted that PR I mentioned, to support use of a system libbpf instead
of immediately diving into ExternalProject_Add():
https://github.com/Sysinternals/ProcDump-for-Linux/pull/225
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 01:59:59PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Based on my records, all issues that can lead to silent miscompilation
> because of altered configure probes (autoconf/CMake and a few others)
> have been addressed, or there are at least Bugzilla bugs filed for them.
> There could b
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:58:37PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Aoife Moloney:
>
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > The split between `/bin` and `/sbin` is not useful, and also unused.
>
> Programs in /usr/bin have their documentation in section 1 of the
> manual, while programs /usr/sbin are
Hi,
On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 16:08 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 2:49 PM Tom Hughes via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > > On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott
> > > >
> > > > wro
* Aoife Moloney:
> == Detailed Description ==
> The split between `/bin` and `/sbin` is not useful, and also unused.
Programs in /usr/bin have their documentation in section 1 of the
manual, while programs /usr/sbin are documented in section 8. (In
general, I deliberately used /usr/bin/ld.so alt
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:51 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Aoife Moloney said:
> > Enable IPv4 Address Conflict Detection by default in NetworkManager.
>
> Huh, I didn't realize NM didn't already do this... ye olde
> network-scripts did.
>
As I recall, depending on configuration(s
Once upon a time, Beniamino Galvani said:
> network-scripts do [1]:
>
> /sbin/arping -c 2 -w ${ARPING_WAIT:-3} -D -I ${REALDEVICE} ${ipaddr[$idx]}
>
> which waits 2 seconds by default.
Ahh, sorry, that's what I get for depending on memory. :)
> In the original RFC, the duration of the ACD pro
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 01:51:01PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Aoife Moloney said:
> > Enable IPv4 Address Conflict Detection by default in NetworkManager.
>
> Huh, I didn't realize NM didn't already do this... ye olde
> network-scripts did.
>
> > To the rescue comes [https://w
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 2:49 PM Tom Hughes via devel
wrote:
>
> On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will
>
On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote:
On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott
wrote:
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will
cause issues for users using router mac filtering.
What this seems to state is that t
On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
issues for users using router mac filtering.
What this seems to state is that the MAC address would be unique for
each SSID,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
> issues for users using router mac filtering.
What this seems to state is that the MAC address would be unique for
each SSID, but once it's picked, it would be lock
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
issues for users using router mac filtering.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
Based on my records, all issues that can lead to silent miscompilation
because of altered configure probes (autoconf/CMake and a few others)
have been addressed, or there are at least Bugzilla bugs filed for them.
There could be some gaps due to lack of architecture capture, general
rawhide churn,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231220.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231221.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 180.73 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi all,
Today is the last day to vote in the F39 elections. Please make sure you do
so, in particular for FESCo where the number of candidates exceed the open
seats.
To vote please visit the Elections App https://elections.fedoraproject.org/
Kind regards,
Aoife
Aoife Moloney
Fedora Operation
Dne 21. 12. 23 v 10:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 20. 12. 23 v 20:53 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
** Adjust `%_sbindir` in `/usr/lib/rpm/macros` (part of `rpm`
package). Packages will be updated automatically during the mass
rebuild.
Isn't the ultimate goal to drop the `%_sbindir` all together
Dne 20. 12. 23 v 20:53 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
** Adjust `%_sbindir` in `/usr/lib/rpm/macros` (part of `rpm`
package). Packages will be updated automatically during the mass
rebuild.
Isn't the ultimate goal to drop the `%_sbindir` all together? Shouldn't
at minimum the packaging guidelines
20 matches
Mail list logo
