Re: goal: booting with an empty /etc

On Mo, 11.12.23 11:10, DJ Delorie (d...@redhat.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering writes: > > Well, as you might be aware many distributions these days do more than > > "files dns" for "hosts", and similar for the other databases, and > > hence a built-in default in glibc is great, but most distrib

F40 Change Propsal: Boost 1.83 upgrade (System-Wide)

Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F40Boost183 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approve

F40 Change Proposal: Podman 5 (Self-Contained)

Wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Podman5 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by

Re: Creation of new package repo failed, Invalid or expired token

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:14:03AM -, Felix Wang wrote: > I opened an releng issue about this. [1] At the time of writing, I noticed > that there is probably an similar issue of failure of package creation > appeared. [2] Hope anyone can help me solve the problem, which maybe the > cause of

Migration to pkcs11-provider from OpenSSL engines

Hello, OpenSSL 3.0.0 deprecated the support for using engines and introduced the concept of providers. If your package requires openssl-pkcs11 (libp11, engine_pkcs11), we recommend that you stop using it, and migrate to using the pkcs11-provider instead. We plan to deprecate and remove openssl-pk

RFC: OpenScanHub Prototype for Fedora

Hello, I am writing this email to get feedback from the members of the Fedora development community about OpenScanHub for Fedora. # tl;dr OpenScanHub does static and dynamic analysis of rpm packages and it may be helpful in the Fedora community. Please take a look at our staging proof of concept

Re: Self Introduction: Rafel Amer

Hello Rafel I'm also a mathematician and I'm happy to see other people from mathematics get involved with Fedora Until you not become a Fedora maintainer (I hope you find a sponsor soon!) we can work together As a Fedora maintainer I think I can check and merge your PRs. Priscila. On Sun, Dec 10

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231212.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231211.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231212.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 91 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.40 GiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Creation of new package repo failed, Invalid or expired token

I opened an releng issue about this. [1] At the time of writing, I noticed that there is probably an similar issue of failure of package creation appeared. [2] Hope anyone can help me solve the problem, which maybe the cause of my personal issue, or other factors. Thanks in advance. [1] https:/

[Heads up]: biosig4c++ 2.5.2 coming to rawhide

In one week (2023-12-19) or a little later I will update biosig4c++ to version 2.5.2 in rawhide. This will bring an soname bump. However, there are no consuming packages, making this a self contained change. Cheers, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty IRC: Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee --

Re: Making -Wmissing-include-dirs an error?

* Jonathan Wakely: >> Missing an include directory isn't necessarily the problem though, it >> is the missing headers that aren't present when they are included >> that would be - and that should trigger a build error for the missing >> file. What advantage does failing on this warning provide tha