Review swaps for deps needed for conda update

I have a number of packages needing review that are required for the latest round of updates to the conda package manager: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2025802&bug_id_type=anddependson&format=tvp&list_id=13378412# I'm particularly excited by libmamba and its micromamba packag

Re: Update on the Modern C initiative

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:09:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > nbdkit rjones Can you help me to understand the build error in this log? https://gitlab.com/fweimer-rh/fedora-modernc-logs/-/raw/main/logs/n/nbdkit.log?ref_type=heads I'm not exactly sure what / where the error is su

Re: Update on the Modern C initiative

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:09:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Integrate a backport of the GCC 14 changes into the rawhide GCC 13 > version (rawhide only, not Fedora 39 or 38). This will allow us > to isolate these issues from GCC 14 issues that typically occur > during the upcoming mas

Re: Proven to be sickened

On Fri Dec 1, 2023 at 16:26 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > So, due to me following my package (notmuch) upstream and testing early > against upstream's git, reporting and working with upstream, I noticed a > FTBFS and helped fixing it. Nothing urgent since it was basically just a > test failing f

Re: Update on the Modern C initiative

* Vít Ondruch: > Dne 01. 12. 23 v 11:40 Milan Crha napsal(a): >> On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 18:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> Again, some of these are false positives. >> Hi, >> I think the errors from the configure time of the script are not always >> problems, are they? > > > This probably

Re: Update on the Modern C initiative

* Milan Crha: > On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 18:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Again, some of these are false positives.  > > Hi, > I think the errors from the configure time of the script are not always > problems, are they? At least in the case of the evolution-data-server, > it's half a prob

Re: Update on the Modern C initiative

* Vít Ondruch: >> Build logs with results from the instrumentation are available here; >> >> >> >> We delete logs from that repository as packages get fixed. > > > How often this happens? It seems that there might be upstream fix for > rubyge

Re: Live usb stuck at grub

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 09:16:31PM -, Ryan Bach via devel wrote: > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20231201.n.0.iso > > This is a bug no? It has been that way for quite some time now. With no detai

Re: Proven to be sickened

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: [snip] > If there isn't anything wrong with the work of the other maintainer, > then I guess I don't understand. They did something in an honest > attempt to save you the trouble and because of unfortunate timing they > didn't a

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231202.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231201.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231202.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 91 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.83 MiB Size of dropped packages:1.59

Re: Proven to be sickened

In my experience through the years, I've found very little proven packagers that would work in what *I would see* as the right way. I too despise random interventions from the higher power to my packages. I rejoiced when the new process of removing inactive proven packagers took place. And I'd lo