Re: dracut problems quick docs page requires help

Hi, On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 12:51 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 09:23:58 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > > The kernel command line arguments for dracut that the page mentions > > still work the same way they worked 10 years ago. (With the > > exception > > of rd.udev.debug, which

Re: Proven to be sickened

Sérgio Basto wrote on 2023/12/02 0:49: On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:26 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: So, due to me following my package (notmuch) upstream and testing early against upstream's git, reporting and working with upstream, I noticed a FTBFS and helped fixing it. Nothing urgent since it w

Re: Proven to be sickened

Jason L Tibbitts III venit, vidit, dixit 2023-12-01 22:41:54: > So I've been in this situation, both on the receiving end of nasty flames > because I dared touch someone else's package and having duplicated work > because I didn't check before trying to update something. > > > Michael J Gruber

Re: Proven to be sickened

So I've been in this situation, both on the receiving end of nasty flames because I dared touch someone else's package and having duplicated work because I didn't check before trying to update something. > Michael J Gruber writes: > So, due to me following my package (notmuch) The idea is t

Live usb stuck at grub

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20231201.n.0.iso This is a bug no? It has been that way for quite some time now. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 9:30 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2023-12-01 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > > > The meeting will

Re: Proven to be sickened

On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:26 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > So, due to me following my package (notmuch) upstream and testing > early against upstream's git, reporting and working with upstream, I > noticed a FTBFS and helped fixing it. Nothing urgent since it was > basically just a test failing f

Re: Mock Configs v39.3 released - DNF5 used for F40+ builds

mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --scrub=bootstrap did the trick. Thank you! On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:27 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:09 PM Jonathan Wright via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> Erm, I do already have dnf5 present within my f39 install wher

Re: Mock Configs v39.3 released - DNF5 used for F40+ builds

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:09 PM Jonathan Wright via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Erm, I do already have dnf5 present within my f39 install where I was > trying to run the mockbuild. > > $ which /usr/bin/dnf5 > /usr/bin/dnf5 > > Any ideas as to the cause of the error? > I bet the

Proven to be sickened

So, due to me following my package (notmuch) upstream and testing early against upstream's git, reporting and working with upstream, I noticed a FTBFS and helped fixing it. Nothing urgent since it was basically just a test failing for the wrong reasons. Within a few days, upstream releases a patch

Re: Mock Configs v39.3 released - DNF5 used for F40+ builds

Erm, I do already have dnf5 present within my f39 install where I was trying to run the mockbuild. $ which /usr/bin/dnf5 /usr/bin/dnf5 Any ideas as to the cause of the error? On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:06 AM Jonathan Wright wrote: > This is awesome! > > I grabbed the RPM and then attempted to ru

Re: Mock Configs v39.3 released - DNF5 used for F40+ builds

This is awesome! I grabbed the RPM and then attempted to run a `fedpkg --release rawhide mockbuild` using it and ran into this error: INFO: Package manager dnf5 detected and used (direct choice) Start: dnf5 update execv(/usr/bin/dnf5) failed: No such file or directory Shouldn't it call dnf5 as a

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231201.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231130.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231201.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 190 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.28 MiB Size of dropped packages

A license correction in rwhoisd

I corrected a license tag in rwhoisd package from: Public Domain and zlib and GPLv2+ to: Public Domain and HSRL and GPLv2+ The License tag will be converted to SPDX format once Legal approves new license identifiers. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___

Mock Configs v39.3 released - DNF5 used for F40+ builds

Hello maintainers! Let me announce a new release of Mock Core Configs v39.3, aka the configuration files for Mock, the chroot build environment manager for building RPMs. The notable change in this release is that we are switching the default package_manager from DNF4 to DNF5, according to the F4

Re: Update on the Modern C initiative

Dne 01. 12. 23 v 11:40 Milan Crha napsal(a): On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 18:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: Again, some of these are false positives. Hi, I think the errors from the configure time of the script are not always problems, are they? This probably falls into the configuration

Re: Update on the Modern C initiative

On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 18:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Again, some of these are false positives.  Hi, I think the errors from the configure time of the script are not always problems, are they? At least in the case of the evolution-data-server, it's half a problem and half expected. S

Re: Unretiring keepass

ouch, ignore my email, I misread between keepassx(.org) and keepass(.info) projects. Keepass project upstream is still active and maintained Sorry, Mikel Hau idatzi du Mikel Olasagasti (mi...@olasagasti.info) erabiltzaileak (2023 abe. 1(a), or. (11:15)): > > Hi Julian, > > Hau idatzi du Julian S

Re: Unretiring keepass

Hi Julian, Hau idatzi du Julian Sikorski (beleg...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2023 aza. 21(a), ar. (10:56)): > > Hi list, > > as the CVE (which was not even a problem with keepass in the first > place) leading to keepass retirement has been resolved in the meantime, > I would like to unretire the

Re: Update on the Modern C initiative

Dne 30. 11. 23 v 18:09 Florian Weimer napsal(a): This message is realted to: The final patches for GCC 14 are currently under upstream review and should land very soon.

Re: Unretiring keepass

Am 21.11.23 um 10:56 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Hi list, as the CVE (which was not even a problem with keepass in the first place) leading to keepass retirement has been resolved in the meantime, I would like to unretire the package. I have submitted a re-review already: https://bugzilla.redha