Re: ELN build order (was: Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild)

2023-10-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 11:16 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: ... > So, as we all know, build ordering is hard (and, despite intuitive > belief, not actually deterministic). > > ELN actually "cheats" somewhat when we do our builds. When we process > a batch of builds (triggered by a set of tag events t

Fedora CoreOS Community Meeting Minutes 2023-10-18

2023-10-18 Thread Steven Presti
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-10-18/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-10-18-16.30.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-10-18/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-10-18-16.30.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-10

Renaming python-jsonschema-spec to python-jsonschema-path

2023-10-18 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Because of upstream name changed, I'm announcing the rename of python-jsonschema-spec to python-jsonschema-path in Rawhide and F39. Currently the consumers of python-jsonschema-spec are: python-openapi-core python-openapi-spec-validator The change should be transparent to other packages, as the

Re: Packaging web extension native part and shared directory ownership

2023-10-18 Thread Robert Marcano via devel
On 10/18/23 11:36 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Robert Marcano via devel writes: I seriously don't know how gnome-browser-connector [1] has ownership of: /usr/lib64/mozilla/native-messaging-hosts and not have conflict problems with mozilla-filesystem at install time, maybe because

Re: Packaging web extension native part and shared directory ownership

2023-10-18 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> Robert Marcano via devel writes: > I seriously don't know how gnome-browser-connector [1] has ownership > of: > /usr/lib64/mozilla/native-messaging-hosts > and not have conflict problems with mozilla-filesystem at install > time, maybe because they usually get installed at the same time

Packaging web extension native part and shared directory ownership

2023-10-18 Thread Robert Marcano via devel
In order to install the native side of a web extension, It is needed to place a JSON manifest on predefined directories for each supported browser: /usr/lib64/mozilla/native-messaging-hosts /etc/chromium/native-messaging-hosts /etc/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts Creating a package that

Re: How to deal with COPR and RPMAutoSpec

2023-10-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:18 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 18. 10. 23 v 16:12 Diego Herrera napsal(a): > > What I usually do when I need for COPR to handle rpmautospec is to set > > the source type to "Custom", and use the following script: > > > > #! /bin/sh -x > > git clone > > cd > > spe

Re: How to deal with COPR and RPMAutoSpec

2023-10-18 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 18. 10. 23 v 16:12 Diego Herrera napsal(a): What I usually do when I need for COPR to handle rpmautospec is to set the source type to "Custom", and use the following script: #! /bin/sh -x git clone cd spectool -g rpmautospec process-distgit Set the Buildroot dependencies to "git rpmde

Re: Execute RPM dependency generators on the .spec file which ships them

2023-10-18 Thread Vít Ondruch
The package is in Fedora now. The practical demonstration are these two commits: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/vondruch/rpms/ruby/c/6d8ecfca02947b5f1ce48cc51943e5f127d93be2 https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/vondruch/rpms/ruby/c/865f5b3a896ed1b423add7ffe0601707155828ef from this PR: http

Re: How to deal with COPR and RPMAutoSpec

2023-10-18 Thread Diego Herrera
What I usually do when I need for COPR to handle rpmautospec is to set the source type to "Custom", and use the following script: #! /bin/sh -x git clone cd spectool -g rpmautospec process-distgit Set the Buildroot dependencies to "git rpmdevtools rpmautospec" and the Result directory to th

Fedora 39 compose report: 20231018.n.0 changes

2023-10-18 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-39-20231017.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20231018.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231018.n.0 changes

2023-10-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231017.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231018.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 175 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 12.12 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Orphaning python-rdflib-jsonld

2023-10-18 Thread Sandro
On 18-10-2023 06:56, Aniket Pradhan wrote: We, at the neuro-sig would be orphaning the package: python-rdflib-jsonld [0]. The package is no longer maintained upstream and is now inherently provided by python-rdflib v6.0.0+. [0]:https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rdflib-jsonld For the r

Re: status openssl1.1

2023-10-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 18. 10. 23 9:35, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: Dear Miro, On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:33 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 16. 10. 23 14:19, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: Why is it too late for F-40? Do you mean F-39? Thanks! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveOpensslCompat Could you please up

Re: status openssl1.1

2023-10-18 Thread Dmitry Belyavskiy
Dear Miro, On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:33 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16. 10. 23 14:19, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > >> Why is it too late for F-40? Do you mean F-39? > > > > Thanks! > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveOpensslCompat > > Could you please update the contingency plan sec