Adam Williamson kirjoitti 14.10.2023 klo 21.28:
Hey folks! I mentioned this in the blocker status summary email I just
sent, but figured it also deserved its own thread just to make sure
folks are aware of it. I've sent a ticket to FESCo:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3082
proposing we bump the
Hey folks!
We, at the neuro-sig would be orphaning the package: python-rdflib-jsonld [0].
The package is no longer maintained upstream and is now inherently
provided by python-rdflib v6.0.0+.
[0]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rdflib-jsonld
--
Thanks
Regards
Aniket Pradhan
https://
Hey folks!
We at the neuro-sig are orphaning the package: python-ratelimiter [0] since it
is no longer being used by any other package and the upstream [1] has been
archived, hence no more updates.
The python-ratelimiter package provides the feature to limit
operations/requests via a simple de
Never mind, I hadn't realized fedpkg had grown the ability to do COPR
builds.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://doc
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:47 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I'm trying to test build packages before actually creating a side tag and
> doing real builds.
>
> I'm using rpkg to do the test builds but openshading language uses
> RPMAutoSpec. I've tried creating empty commits to bump the release but
I'm trying to test build packages before actually creating a side tag and
doing real builds.
I'm using rpkg to do the test builds but openshading language uses
RPMAutoSpec. I've tried creating empty commits to bump the release but it
does not appear to be working.
What's the work around?
Thanks,
On 16. 10. 23 14:19, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
Why is it too late for F-40? Do you mean F-39?
Thanks!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveOpensslCompat
Could you please update the contingency plan section?
"Package owners should update their packages to remove the dependency" is not
Wiki Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveOpensslCompat
Discussion.fpo Link:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-removing-openssl-1-1-package-system-wide/92899
== Summary ==
We are going to remove the openssl1.1 package from Fedora 40.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[U
Wiki Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.13
Discussion.fpo Link:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-python-3-13-system-wide/92897
== Summary ==
Update the Python stack in Fedora from Python 3.12 to Python 3.13, the
newest major release of the Python progr
Wiki Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Update_To_Pydantic_Version_2
Discussion.fpo Link:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-update-to-pydantic-version-2-self-contained/92894
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals ar
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 1:59 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Is there any chance we can have this drafted as a change request for F40?
>
It is being drafted, don't worry:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ZlibNGTransition
We'll hopefully submit it soon.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there'
Is there any chance we can have this drafted as a change request for F40?
Inviato da Proton Mail mobile
Messaggio originale
Il 19 Set 2023, 18:26, Daniel Alley ha scritto:
> Will this be posted soon? ___
> devel mailing list -- devel
The discussion thread to provide feedback for this change proposal can
be found here:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f40-change-proposal-fedora-atomic-desktops-self-contained/92893
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
h
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AtomicDesktops
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee
On Tue, 2023-10-17 at 11:41 +, Martin Cermak wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> based on my end user experience, users are only allowed to re-trigger Fedora
> CI tests in case they are committers for the component in question. Would it
> be possible to open it a little bit for certain other users?
OLD: Fedora-39-20231016.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20231017.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:17.80 MiB
Size of
This is a story from the worst kind of user experience you can encounter
and it can't even be put in one bugreport,
so i think, here relevant discussion can happen. I really do not wanne
make too much hassle about it, but I could happen anyone
upgrading it's system instead of periodically reinsta
Hello folks,
based on my end user experience, users are only allowed to re-trigger Fedora CI
tests in case they are committers for the component in question. Would it be
possible to open it a little bit for certain other users? Specifically Red Hat
QE typically aren't even fedora packagers.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231015.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231017.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 131
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.23 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi
python-socketio / python-engineio grew a new dependency on
python-simple-websocket. I've submitted it for review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244587.
Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list
20 matches
Mail list logo
