Hi Marius,,
I'd also point out that if you want to inform the security team about something, you
should inform directly – and it seems you've done that, by properly labeling that issue
(which I can't read at all) as sensitive. As the others pointed out, there's nothing that
can be done publicl
As far as the "Fedora Security Team" we dont know anything that's not
public either. RH's security team has access to the embargoed stuff and I
assume that they handle it privately with the package maintainer and prep
the patch themselves. I say assume because I have zero visibility into what
they
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 10:55 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 11:13:32AM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is emerg ping for the security team, to take a look at this bz :
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241470
>
> If this is an embargoed
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 11:13:32AM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is emerg ping for the security team, to take a look at this bz :
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241470
If this is an embargoed bug (I can't see it, so no idea if it is, but it
seems likely), pleas
In one week, 2023-10-07, or slightly later, I plan to update
python-absl-py to 2.0.0 in Rawhide[1].
This release has some potentially breaking changes, described in [2],
but it is a leaf package, so there is no impact to other packages in Fedora.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-
On 30-09-2023 02:16, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
supervisor in fedora 39 is 4.2.2 but the version that supports python
3.12 is 4.2.5. I filed Bug 2239529 about this and have received no
response.
I've updatedhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239529 with links
to an updated Rawhide scra
Hi,
this is emerg ping for the security team, to take a look at this bz :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241470
excuse me, for bringing this to the list, as a security bz is the way to
go, but time is running fast and the patched release needs to be build
and shipped in 36h hou
Hello,
mame package uses mame -validate as %check step. It has recently started
to cause problems on rawhide/aarch64:
- I had to cancel 0.258 build after 16 hours [1]
- 0.259 build is stuck since ca. 1600 UTC yesterday [2]
Other branches built fine for aarch64, and so did other arches for
rawh
