Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-09-23 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 24/09/23 01:18, Neal Gompa ha scritto: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 6:05 PM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 23 2023 at 10:26:48 PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos >> wrote: >>> Could someone involved >>> with AppStream please provide some information? Shouldn't our >>> documentation be cha

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-09-23 Thread otto.liljalaa...@iki.fi
24. syyskuuta 2023 2.18.14 GMT+03:00 Neal Gompa kirjoitti: >> On Sat, Sep 23 2023 at 10:26:48 PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos >> wrote: >> > Could someone involved >> > with AppStream please provide some information? Shouldn't our >> > documentation be changed to reflect these changes? Does the

Heads up: OpenColorIO 2.3.0

2023-09-23 Thread Richard Shaw
I haven't been able to find the new command in my email history to find dependencies but my old script shows the following need to be rebuilt: blender krita luxcorerender OpenImageIO usd I'll try them in a COPR first to make sure there aren't any issues. Thanks, Richard _

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-09-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 6:05 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 23 2023 at 10:26:48 PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos > wrote: > > Could someone involved > > with AppStream please provide some information? Shouldn't our > > documentation be changed to reflect these changes? Does the FPC nee

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-09-23 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sat, Sep 23 2023 at 10:26:48 PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Could someone involved with AppStream please provide some information? Shouldn't our documentation be changed to reflect these changes? Does the FPC need to decide on this? From upstream perspective: appstream-util is indeed

Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-09-23 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
The current state of things, Fedora-wise, is summarized in FPC ticket #1053: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1053 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedor

Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

2023-09-23 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Hello, According to our packaging guidelines[1], "you MUST run appstream-util validate-relax (in %check or %install) and have BuildRequires: libappstream-glib, to help ensure the validity and safety of the appdata files you’re installing". For quite some time now, I've been seeing references to a

[Test-Announce] 2023-09-25 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 39 Blocker Review Meeting

2023-09-23 Thread Adam Williamson
# F39 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2023-09-25 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat (*NOT* Matrix) Hi folks! We have 7 proposed Final blockers and 7 proposed Final freeze exception issues to review, so let's have a meeting on Monday. The meeting will on IRC onl

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230923.n.0 changes

2023-09-23 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-39-20230922.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230923.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:8 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 50 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.41 MiB Size of dropped packages:19.31 MiB Size

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230923.n.0 changes

2023-09-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230922.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230923.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 50 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 2.09 MiB Size of dropped packages