Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-21)

2023-09-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2023-09-21-17.03.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2023-09-21-17.03.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2023-09-21 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2023-09-22 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > FESCo has requested that the ELN SIG document some of its policie

Schedule for Thursday's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-21)

2023-09-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Note: this announcement is very late, I know. But we didn't assign any chair for this meeting, so setting of the agenda slipped through the cracks. Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.libera.chat. To convert

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 3:25 PM Ron Olson wrote: > > Hey all- > > I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I get > a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39) > https://koj

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Ron Olson
Right, I was leaning in that direction regardless, if only because it means keeping track of what-has-what easier. :) On 21 Sep 2023, at 9:56, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 09:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote: Could I, possibly, temporarily drop support for aarch64 in the spec file fo

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Ron Olson
> Are upstream responsive to issues in general, and in particular this > case which is not the current version? I mean to say, do you think > they'd provide a fix very quickly if you asked them to look at it? > Sorry for the confusion, 5.9 is the current version, it was released on Monday; I wan

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 09:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > The funny thing is that Apple has already started providing development > versions of Swift 5.10 and it does, in fact, build on both x86_64 and aarch64. This seems like it presents an opportunity. If this were me, I would look into the changes

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 09:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > Could I, possibly, temporarily drop support for aarch64 in the spec file for > 5.9 so all versions of x86_64 can get it, and then re-enable it for if/when I > figure out what’s going on with the aarch64 version? Please don't do this. It's ver

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 10:24, Ron Olson wrote: > Hey all- > > I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I > get a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39) > https://koji.f

Re: Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 09:24:26AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > Hey all- > > I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I get > a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39) > ht

Package fails to build for aarch64, works for x86_64

2023-09-21 Thread Ron Olson
Hey all- I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I get a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291750 (Rawhide/F40)

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2023-09-21 Thread sgallagh
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2023-09-22 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10568/ ___ devel maili

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230921.n.0 changes

2023-09-21 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230920.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230921.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 135 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.10 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: LoadOptions handling in rhboot/shim fallback.c

2023-09-21 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Mike Beaton writes: > Vitaly Kuznetsov has offered https://github.com/rhboot/shim/pull/611 > to fix the NVRAM entry generated by `add_boot_option(...)` in Shim's > `fallback.c`. > > It is quite pervasive in that file to treat the size of the loaded > image arguments as `StrLen(arguments) * 2` (ju