Re: Inactive packager policy for the F39 cycle

Il 30/08/23 22:02, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Might you be willing to also do the provenpackager one? >> ( https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/ ) >> > For Mattia (or anyone else who wants to pick this up), you can see

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

On 8/31/23 02:11, David Cantrell wrote: I personally agree that this is enough of a change to warrant consideration for Fedora 39, but I want Fedora QA to weigh in. As per Adam's input I've created [1] and suggested to backport the specific patch as a freeze exception. [1] https://bugzilla.red

KDE and GNOME Join Hands To Add Payments To Turn Flathub Into a Store for the Linux Desktop

It would be nice for Redhat to monetize the Desktop. What do you guys think? https://www.reddit.com/r/linux_gaming/comments/11accyi/kde_and_gnome_join_hands_to_add_payments_to_turn/ 6 mo. ago ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

Re: grub not working on Fedora Rawhide Workstation iso?

Thanks I posted there, if you need more info just state in the bugzilla. Thank you. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedorapr

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

On 8/31/23 05:45, Adam Williamson wrote: well, the question is not so much how useful is *this* change, but what *other* changes does coreutils 9.4 introduce. During Beta freeze, it would be much safer to just backport this specific change. This is clearly not a Beta blocker, but you can propose

Re: Intern Introduction & Goals (Open 3D Engine)

Dear Nicholas, On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:30:42AM -0400, Nicholas Frizzell wrote: > My name is Nicholas and I'm working this summer as an intern with Red > Hat. My primary objective this summer is to improve support for the > O3DE project (https://www.o3de.org/) in Fedora and eventually have it >

Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-08-30

Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-08-30/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-08-30-16.29.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023-08-30/fedora_coreos_meeting.2023-08-30-16.29.txt Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2023

Re: grub not working on Fedora Rawhide Workstation iso?

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 1:10 PM Ryan Bach via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Workstation/x86_64/iso/ Ryan, I've opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2236301 to track this issue. Please add technic

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 20:45, Adam Williamson wrote: [..] BTW it would be good to push as many coreutils patches to upstream. Especially the selinux patch. kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lis

Re: Inactive packager policy for the F39 cycle

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 2:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Might you be willing to also do the provenpackager one? > ( https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/ ) > For Mattia (or anyone else who wants to pick this up), you can see my SOP at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 12:11 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > On 8/29/23 23:13, Ian Laurie wrote: > > coreutils-9.3 brought changes to the behavior of the -v option which > > broke some of my automation scripts. > > > > Because of this I have been blocking updates to coreutils in Rawhide and > > Fedo

grub not working on Fedora Rawhide Workstation iso?

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Workstation/x86_64/iso/ Changing to systemd now? Any ETA? Thank you. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

Thanks Kevin, Am 30.08.23 um 20:54 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: Was there any changes from the last version that would increase memory/cpu use? or have any issues building on a vm instead of a real machine? Perhaps some folks could try building on an x86_64 vm and see if it happens outside of koji?

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:01:18PM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 30.08.23 um 10:59 schrieb Peter Robinson: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:55 AM Martin Stransky wrote: > > > On 8/30/23 10:51, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > The builds are here: > > > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/

Re: Inactive packager policy for the F39 cycle

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:21:57AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Hello folks, > > I've started the "Inactive Packagers Policy" procedure [1] for the F39 > release cycle. Thanks for doing this! Might you be willing to also do the provenpackager one? ( https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U

Re: Manual step in upgrade process for a FSWC

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 11:59:18AM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote: > Hi, > > I intend to switch pam_userdb's database provider from BerkeleyDB to GDBM > and I'm writing a Fedora System-Wide Change > for Fedora 40. > The upgrade process would

Re: CVE: Python-twisted a.o. needs update for F37 due to matrix-synapse security issue

On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 3:45 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 26/05/2023 16:22, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > This brings me to the question: whats the main issue for twisted here? > > 1. Contact python-twisted maintainers. Marius, According to the upstream m

Re: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 05:49:24PM -, Daniel Alley wrote: > > The background to this is I've spent far too long trying to optimize > > the conversion of qcow2 files to raw files. Most existing qcow2 files > > that you can find online are zlib compressed, including the qcow2 > > images provided

Re: Looking for a new (possibly better) python-argcomplete maintainer

--- Original Message --- On Wednesday, August 30th, 2023 at 11:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Thanks. Added @canderson9 as a co-admin. > Thanks, just let me know if you need any help with the package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

Am 30.08.23 um 10:59 schrieb Peter Robinson: On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:55 AM Martin Stransky wrote: On 8/30/23 10:51, Peter Robinson wrote: The builds are here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=37 So you mean all 3? Yes. Well I've freed the 3 x86 builds, I presume y

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

On 8/29/23 23:13, Ian Laurie wrote: coreutils-9.3 brought changes to the behavior of the -v option which broke some of my automation scripts. Because of this I have been blocking updates to coreutils in Rawhide and Fedora 39. and I'm running coreutils-9.2-4.fc39.x86_64. This change in the -v op

Inactive packager policy for the F39 cycle

Hello folks, I've started the "Inactive Packagers Policy" procedure [1] for the F39 release cycle. For each user detected as "inactive" a ticket was opened and the full list can be seen at [2]. In two weeks I'll post a comment in each ticket still open with a list of affected packages that pos

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 09:11 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:50 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 15:14 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Richard Hughes said: > > > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Leon Fauster via devel > > > > wrote: > >

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230830.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-39-20230829.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230830.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 8 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

Once upon a time, Peter Robinson said: > What about integration with Let's Encypt as an option, the cert > registration/renewal process is then pretty automated. Since this is about desktop systems on internal networks, they probably won't have pre-existing DNS entries, so Let's Encrypt is not an

Manual step in upgrade process for a FSWC

Hi, I intend to switch pam_userdb's database provider from BerkeleyDB to GDBM and I'm writing a Fedora System-Wide Change for Fedora 40. The upgrade process would involve a manual procedure where the user needs to run a conversion tool f

Re: Why does mingw-filesystem depend on mingw-binutils-generic?

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 10:39:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 10:36:26AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'd say, as least as it stands now, this is because the dependency > > generators require mingw-objdump, see mingw.req [1]. > > > > Sandro > > > > [1]

Re: Why does mingw-filesystem depend on mingw-binutils-generic?

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 10:36:26AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'd say, as least as it stands now, this is because the dependency > generators require mingw-objdump, see mingw.req [1]. > > Sandro > > [1] > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-filesystem/blob/rawhide/f/mingw.req I se

Re: Looking for a new (possibly better) python-argcomplete maintainer

On 23. 08. 23 13:00, Sandro wrote: On 21-08-2023 13:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: I don't want to maintain it, but pytest uses it for tests, so I don't want to be retired. Is there somebody else who would take better care of it than I do? Miro, you are way too young to "be retired". 😜 🤦 I'd be w

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:55 AM Martin Stransky wrote: > > On 8/30/23 10:51, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:48 AM Martin Stransky wrote: > >> > >> On 8/30/23 10:43, Peter Robinson wrote: > >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:42 AM Marius Schwarz > >>> wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

On 8/30/23 10:51, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:48 AM Martin Stransky wrote: On 8/30/23 10:43, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:42 AM Marius Schwarz wrote: Hi, as mozilla released the updates notes for ff 117, there are a lot of high impact security fixes

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:48 AM Martin Stransky wrote: > > On 8/30/23 10:43, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:42 AM Marius Schwarz > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> as mozilla released the updates notes for ff 117, there are a lot of > >> high impact security fixes for ff 117

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

On 8/30/23 10:43, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:42 AM Marius Schwarz wrote: Hi, as mozilla released the updates notes for ff 117, there are a lot of high impact security fixes for ff 117. unfortunatly, the ff 117 builds on the farm seem stuck for 40+h , according to koji.

Re: firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:42 AM Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Hi, > > as mozilla released the updates notes for ff 117, there are a lot of > high impact security fixes for ff 117. > > unfortunatly, the ff 117 builds on the farm seem stuck for 40+h , > according to koji. > > I informed Martin, but can

firefox builds seem stuck on the farm - pls check

Hi, as mozilla released the updates notes for ff 117, there are a lot of high impact security fixes for ff 117. unfortunatly, the ff 117 builds on the farm seem stuck for 40+h , according to koji. I informed  Martin, but can someone else take a look too, in case hes not available? Thanks

Re: Why does mingw-filesystem depend on mingw-binutils-generic?

Hi I'd say, as least as it stands now, this is because the dependency generators require mingw-objdump, see mingw.req [1]. Sandro [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-filesystem/blob/rawhide/f/mingw.req On 30.08.23 10:30, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpm

Why does mingw-filesystem depend on mingw-binutils-generic?

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/virt-v2v/pull-request/2 mingw-binutils-generic contains a random selection of binaries: $ rpm -ql mingw-binutils-generic /usr/bin/mingw-nm /usr/bin/mingw-objcopy /usr/bin/mingw-objdump /usr/bin/mingw-strip For unclear reasons, mingw32-filesystem depends on min

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:50 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 15:14 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Richard Hughes said: > > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Leon Fauster via devel > > > wrote: > > > > whats the benefit of this "self-signed TLS certificate" (as it do