https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232998
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-43e311ad61 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232998
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3fba3ba3a5 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --ref
Dne 22. 08. 23 v 22:55 Richard Fontana napsal(a):
The use of `+` is documented at
https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2-draft/SPDX-license-expressions/
(there's probably a more recent version)
D.3 Simple license expressions
A simple is composed one of the following:
An SPDX License List Short
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 4:44 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:39 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 3:06 PM Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:21 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > > > rust-bitmaps warning: not valid ne
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:39 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 3:06 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:21 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > > rust-bitmaps warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please
> > > check
> >
> > This uses MPL-2.0
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 3:06 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:21 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > rust-bitmaps warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please
> > check
>
> This uses MPL-2.0 or later, denoted as "MPL-2.0+". It looks like an
> SPDX identifier, but i
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 7:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 22. 08. 23 v 1:08 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
>
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 9:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> New projection when we will be finished is 2025-01-11 (we are slowing down.
> Again. :( ). Pure linear approximation.
>
> It mi
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:28 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:08 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 22. 08. 23 v 13:21 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> >
> > 2) rust-btrd:
> > License: GPL-2.0
> >
> > This is not on SPDX list, it should be either GPL-2.0-only or
> > GPL-2.0
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:08 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 22. 08. 23 v 13:21 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
>
> 2) rust-btrd:
> License: GPL-2.0
>
> This is not on SPDX list, it should be either GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later
>
>
> This is not on SPDX list *anymore*. It used to be valid identifier
Hi,
On 8/6/23 08:33, John Reiser wrote:
On 8/6/23 02:00, Peter Robinson wrote:
We tried to pull some of the optimisations in some time ago to the
Fedora package and they caused some issues with compatibility.
Please provide *any* documentation! Such as: the dates the work was
performed,
th
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:05 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
(snip)
> Looks like there are 7 packages that I can fix later today:
>
> - rust-docopt
> - rust-procs
> - rust-rustcat
> - rust-tokei
> - rust-tree-sitter
> - rust-tree-sitter-cli
> - rust-varlink-cli
rust-docopt, rust-rustcat, rust-tokei
Dne 22. 08. 23 v 21:05 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
There's four packages that use "MPL-2.0+" which is not a valid SPDX identifier.
Not sure what to do about them, since I don't want to ignore upstream
license specification and change them to just "MPL-2.0".
I checked the sized-chunks
https://cr
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:21 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 22. 08. 23 v 1:08 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
>
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 9:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
(snip)
Thanks for running the checks! I looked at all the packages you listed.
> I run the statistics for rust-* only. And when
Sorry, resending because the original message was rejected by the
mailing list.
Hi Lukas,
Lukas Javorsky writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently maintaining the zlib package across Fedora and Red Hat products.
>
> I like the proposal for the zlib-ng package, there are just a few questions
> for @Tulio
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 09:29:08AM -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
wrote:
> "Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
>
> > The background to this is I've spent far too long trying to optimize
> > the conversion of qcow2 files to raw files. Most existing qcow2 files
> > that you can find online are
In one week, 2023-08-29, I plan to update llhttp from 8.1.1 to 9.0.1 in
F40/Rawhide[1]. This update contains some breaking API changes and
breaks the ABI, bumping the SONAME version[2][3]. Most significantly,
the compile-time LLHTTP_STRICT_MODE option is replaced with three new
runtime flags.
Hi all,
Today's an important day on the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1], with
several significant cut-offs. First of all, today is the Bodhi
updates-testing activation point [2]. That means that from now all
Fedora Linux 39 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass
the relevant requireme
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-08-23 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
#to
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 09:04:20PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 7:02 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > exiv2 has had a new release for a few months now - 0.28.0 - which causes
> > an soname bump.
> >
> > I've put up a PR for the update -
> > ht
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:12 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 22. 08. 23 v 15:07 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
>
> Dne 22. 08. 23 v 13:21 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
>
> 2) rust-btrd:
> License: GPL-2.0
>
> This is not on SPDX list, it should be either GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later
>
>
> This is not on
Dne 22. 08. 23 v 15:07 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 22. 08. 23 v 13:21 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
|2) r||ust-btrd: License: ||GPL-2.0|
This is not on SPDX list, it should be either |GPL-2.0-only or
||GPL-2.0-or-later|
This is not on SPDX list *anymore*. It used to be valid identifier n
Dne 22. 08. 23 v 13:21 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
|2) r||ust-btrd: License: ||GPL-2.0|
This is not on SPDX list, it should be either |GPL-2.0-only or
||GPL-2.0-or-later|
This is not on SPDX list *anymore*. It used to be valid identifier not
long ago. I am afraid that this identifies is
Dne 22. 08. 23 v 1:08 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 9:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
New projection when we will be finished is 2025-01-11 (we are slowing down.
Again. :( ). Pure linear approximation.
It might not be as bad as you think!
All rust-* packages had been exclude
Hi,
I'm currently maintaining the zlib package across Fedora and Red Hat
products.
I like the proposal for the zlib-ng package, there are just a few questions
for @Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho :
1) Just to clarify, do you want to have two separate packages (zlib-ng and
e.g. zlib-ng-compat) i
24 matches
Mail list logo
