[Test-Announce] Join now GNOME 45 Test Week

Hello, As most of you might know, with each new release of Fedora, we get a new GNOME and that means this is the time to test GNOME 45's new features. GNOME 45 test week begins today. During the course of next week, we will have 14-17 reserved for testing the Desktop and the Core Apps [0] and the

Re: Intent to orphan several python packages

On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several of these packages do not have dependencies p

Intent to orphan several python packages

I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several of these packages do not have dependencies packaged in Fedora. spyder (docstring-to-m

Re: Potential (security) issue for beginners/non-experts when release is End Of Life: Fedora doesn’t consider the behavior of beginners/non-experts sufficiently

Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 12:07:05PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote: > > Please do not clutter the user experience with such _additional_ > > informations. The user on such workstations are not always the > > administrator and such informations would not help/change the

Re: Potential (security) issue for beginners/non-experts when release is End Of Life: Fedora doesn’t consider the behavior of beginners/non-experts sufficiently

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Fedora Workstation will display a nag notification once per week when a > newer release is available, so unless you uninstall GNOME Software or > ignore all notifications, you should at least be aware that a newer > version is available. > > I had thought we had daily na

Re: RPM packaging help

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 12:40 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > > Please let me know if there is anything that can be done with the > > kubernetes rpms to help. > > The kubernetes rpms are completely separate from the unbundled > golang-k8s-* packages and use bundled dependencies as far as I know. > Thanks

Re: RPM packaging help

On Sun Aug 13, 2023 at 11:28 -0700, Brad Smith wrote: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 9:12 AM Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: > > > > > > > I don't have an ETA on the K8S situation. > > > > Please let me know if there is anything that can be done with the > kubernetes rpms to help. The kubernetes rpms a

Re: RPM packaging help

Hi Robert-André and Andrew, On Sun Aug 13, 2023 at 11:23 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On 8/10/23 15:43, Andrew Heath wrote: > > All, > > My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team and > > we are trying to > > create some RPMs for some projects that we are work

Re: RPM packaging help

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 9:12 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > > I don't have an ETA on the K8S situation. > Please let me know if there is anything that can be done with the kubernetes rpms to help. Best regards Brad ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: RPM packaging help

Robert, Thanks again for your help! On Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 12:12 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On 8/13/23 17:30, Andrew Heath wrote: > > Robert, > > Thank you, this is very helpful, so I guess the questions I have is if > I'm reading > > your email correctly > > > > 1. Is for now we need to d

Re: RPM packaging help

On 8/13/23 17:30, Andrew Heath wrote: Robert, Thank you,  this is very helpful, so I guess the questions I have is if I'm reading your email correctly 1. Is for now we need to deal with the vendor directory, but should start working to packaging some of the go-lang dependencies as rpms? Y

Re: RPM packaging help

Robert, Thank you, this is very helpful, so I guess the questions I have is if I'm reading your email correctly 1. Is for now we need to deal with the vendor directory, but should start working to packaging some of the go-lang dependencies as rpms? 2. With the bundled vendor directory we have a

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230813.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-39-20230812.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230813.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 37 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 23.71 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230813.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230812.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230813.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 13 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 61 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 30.33 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Failing jobs for Rawhide (and F39?) in Fedora CI due to use of old mock configs

On 12. 08. 23 18:58, Adam Williamson wrote: I've seen several folks report that jobs (usually scratch build tests) are failing in Fedora CI, e.g. this one: https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/dist-git-build-pipeline/job/master/37878/console the failures all seem to hav

Re: RPM packaging help

On 8/10/23 15:43, Andrew Heath wrote: All, My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team and we are trying to create some RPMs for some projects that we are working on, one of the RPMs we need to create is for the Ansible receptor[1 ]

Re: Potential (security) issue for beginners/non-experts when release is End Of Life: Fedora doesn’t consider the behavior of beginners/non-experts sufficiently

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 12:07:05PM +0200, Leon Fauster via devel wrote: > Please do not clutter the user experience with such _additional_ > informations. The user on such workstations are not always the > administrator and such informations would not help/change the > situation either. I actually