>In my test zlib-ng is about 40% faster.
I did some testing with zlib-ng and createrepo-c a few months ago [0], and I
also found that the compression portion of the workload was about 40% faster.
So this matches my experience, too.
(BTW, if that github comment [0] sounds negative, it isn't mea
Dne 05. 08. 23 v 8:52 Gavin Henry napsal(a):
* Progress: 41.04% ██ 100%
What tool generated the above? Looks nice.
https://mitchelpl.github.io/Progress-Bar-Generator/
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
Hello packagers,
I'm working on packaging ntpd-rs (an NTP service written in Rust), and
I now have all dependencies available in Fedora, so I need to actually
look into how to package ntpd-rs itself. This is the first time I'm
packaging something that ships a systemd service *and* creates a
custom
I plan to update codec2 to version 1.5.0 and will perform all rebuilds in a
side tag.
Affected packages:
baresip
ffmpeg
freedv
gnuradio
lpcnetfreedv
sdrangel
sdrpp
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 4:12 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> The background to this is I've spent far too long trying to optimize
> the conversion of qcow2 files to raw files. Most existing qcow2 files
> that you can find online are zlib compressed, including the qcow2
> images provided by Fedora
The background to this is I've spent far too long trying to optimize
the conversion of qcow2 files to raw files. Most existing qcow2 files
that you can find online are zlib compressed, including the qcow2
images provided by Fedora. Each cluster in the file is separately
compressed as a zlib strea
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230804.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230805.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 110
Downgraded packages: 2
Size of added packages: 10.92 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 01. 08. 23 23:48, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On 7/31/23 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching.
5 weekly reminders are required, henc
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230805.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
> * Progress: 41.04% ██ 100%
>
>
What tool generated the above? Looks nice.
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedora
Two weeks ago we had:
* 23102 spec files in Fedora
* 29514license tags in all spec files
* 17401 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
* 6486tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
* Progress: 41.04% ██ 100%
ELN subset:
1125 out of 3083 packages are not conve
Hi,
I would like to unorphan snapraid.
I have the current version 12.2 already packaged and running. Instead of
creating a copr I would like to build it for Fedora directly.
But I can't find a reason why it was orphaned.
If there is no complains I will take ownership of this package and releas
12 matches
Mail list logo
