On 8/4/23 22:08, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, Susi Lehtola wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it's been a while since I did active Python packaging. However, one of my
>> packages, python-qcelemental, https://github.com/MolSSI/QCElemental, has
>> switched over from setup.py to
>>
>> $ python -m pip
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 23:43 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Practically speaking, we should be able to just re-run the tests and it
> should come out good. I'll bonk that button now.
Ah, as the failure wasn't a gating one, Bodhi doesn't show the Re-
Trigger Tests button. So I can't do it. Someo
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 15:40 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems there is an issue with the test results presented in bodhi, please
> see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-94f22746e1
>
> bodhi thinks fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional failed (it's
> "red"), but when I
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 11:13 -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> 2. We need to work out 1-2 methods we 'support' for upgrading which of the
> ones below I would say D and A where certain tooling will check to see if
> the upgrade is possible and then alert if it isn't and try a method of
> turning thing
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
it's been a while since I did active Python packaging. However, one of my
packages, python-qcelemental, https://github.com/MolSSI/QCElemental, has
switched over from setup.py to
$ python -m pip install qcelemental
I did not see anything in the Pyth
Hi,
it's been a while since I did active Python packaging. However, one of my
packages, python-qcelemental, https://github.com/MolSSI/QCElemental, has
switched over from setup.py to
$ python -m pip install qcelemental
I did not see anything in the Python packaging guidelines on how to handle su
I realized I have a package pending review[1] that uses
python-testing.postgresql for its tests, so I have picked it back up
(along with python-testing.common.database), and I will fix the
FTI/FTBFS in F39/Rawhide.
It’s unfortunate that upstream seems to have moved on from these
packages, but
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 06:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for Fedora
> 39
> no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem during upgrades.
> When
> users try to upgrade from previous Fedora releases with
> fedora-
Hi folks,
fedtex is now built, and updates pushed:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=fedtex
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
seems there is an issue with the test results presented in bodhi, please
see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-94f22746e1
bodhi thinks fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional failed (it's
"red"), but when I click on the test in bodhi testing farm say "passed".
What can b
V Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 12:16:14PM +0200, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for Fedora
> 39 no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem during upgrades.
> When users try to upgrade from previous Fedora releases with
> fedora-repos-m
Once upon a time, Steve Grubb said:
> Yes, as one of the authors of xinetd, I pointed this out long ago. But they
> said they were not trying to replace xinetd and if people want a more full
> featured experience, use xinetd.
Except... wasn't there a big push to replace xinetd with systemd sock
Once upon a time, Miro Hrončok said:
> On 04. 08. 23 14:45, Chris Adams wrote:
> >Could the repo config be removed by having fedora-repos Obsolete:
> >fedora-repos-moduler <= 39?
>
> That has already been done. But when the upgrade happens, the repo
> config is still there, to be removed in the t
On Friday, August 4, 2023 8:42:18 AM EDT Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
>
> > The DoS attack is described here:
> >
> > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/62248
> >
> > ... and it sounds like a bug in systemd. Surely this same attack
> > applies to any socket-acti
On 04. 08. 23 14:45, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Miro Hrončok said:
With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for
Fedora 39 no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem
during upgrades. When users try to upgrade from previous Fedora
releases with fedora
Once upon a time, Miro Hrončok said:
> With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for
> Fedora 39 no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem
> during upgrades. When users try to upgrade from previous Fedora
> releases with fedora-repos-modular installed, they will
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> The DoS attack is described here:
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/62248
>
> ... and it sounds like a bug in systemd. Surely this same attack
> applies to any socket-activated service so should be fixed in systemd?
> I don't recall inetd having th
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230803.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230804.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 101
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.89 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 12:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like the public 'rawhide' location *does* still have a Modular
> > > tree:
> > >
> > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/raw
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 12:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> > It looks like the public 'rawhide' location *does* still have a Modular
> > tree:
> >
> > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Modular/
> >
> > but there's still a problem there, because...it's now
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:42:07AM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 12:16 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for Fedora
> > 39
> > no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem during
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 12:16 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for Fedora 39
> no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem during upgrades. When
> users try to upgrade from previous Fedora releases with fedora
Hello folks,
With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for Fedora 39
no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem during upgrades. When
users try to upgrade from previous Fedora releases with fedora-repos-modular
installed, they will hit fatal errors that will
Steve Grubb writes:
> On Monday, June 26, 2023 2:47:01 PM EDT Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:15 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:29:03AM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I've pushed a fresh build of OpenSSH to rawhide.
> We decided to drop the sshd.socket unit from rawhide. We don't think
> it's worth going through the changes process, but would like to
> provide a heads-up.
25 matches
Mail list logo
