Re: Update on DNF05 in Fedora

Thank you for the question. The next release will remove obsolete of dnf, provide of dnf, conflict with dnf and symlink /usr/bin/dnf from DNF5 package in rawhide. It means that if you have dnf5 installed on your system, dnf5 will stay on your system. If you wish to install dnf package then you c

Re: Dropping of sshd.socket unit

Just a question, do we have any mechanism to migrate users from sshd.socket to sshd.service? Otherwise someone may suddenly lose access to their headless systems after an upgrade. 在 2023/8/3 10:29, Dmitry Belyavskiy 写道: Dear colleagues, I've pushed a fresh build of OpenSSH to rawhide. We deci

Re: Review request: jedit

I will take it. чт, 3 авг. 2023 г., 19:24 Zdeněk Žamberský : > Hello, > > review request (jedit): > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228918 > > reviewers welcome :) > thanks > > -- > Zdeněk Žamberský > OpenJDK QE > Red Hat > ___ > devel mail

Review request: jedit

Hello, review request (jedit): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228918 reviewers welcome :) thanks -- Zdeněk Žamberský OpenJDK QE Red Hat ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@l

License change: python-h5io is now simply BSD-3-Clause

Prior to release 0.1.8, python-h5io used a bundled, amalgamated versioneer.py under CC0-1.0 to generate a _version.py file under the same license, so the package was licensed (BSD-3-Clause AND CC0-1.0). With release 0.1.8, upstream no longer uses Versioneer, so the package license is now simply

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 4:11 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > > I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or > > build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I > > just encountered while preparing an update for the package: > > > > $ git push > > Sou

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

> I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or > build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I > just encountered while preparing an update for the package: > > $ git push > Source file '60-%{fontpkgname1}.conf' was neither listed in the > 'sources' f

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:15 PM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Is it up to the packagers to rebuild these? I have a package on this > list, but there is no commit in dist-git concerning the F39 Mass > Rebuild. I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or build either. I w

Re: Direwolf FTBFS: Need C help

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 7:14 AM Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 06:47:58AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I was poking around trying to fix the FTBFS problem with direwolf and it > > looks simple enough. As it has built before for years I assume it's > related > > to GCC 13. > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230803.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230802.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230803.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:189 Upgraded packages: 117 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 13.35 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Script for installing TeXLive packages required by a document?

Review is up: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228841 Should be quite an easy one, if anyone wants to swap :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP sign

PETSc upgrade to the release 3.19.4

Hi all. In some days (7 days al least), i will upgrade PETSc libraries to the release 3.19.4 in Rawhide (waiting for PETSc-3.20). All related dependencies will be rebuilt in a f39-side-tag build tree. Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagit

Re: Script for installing TeXLive packages required by a document?

On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 15:10:34 -0400, Blaise Pabon wrote: > Peace and blessings upon you, this is great.  > Years ago, managing Tex dependencies was the bane of my life. Haha, yeh, but all the work spot and others do to package TeXLive for us makes it so much easier now :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ank

Re: Script for installing TeXLive packages required by a document?

On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 20:52:24 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > This is very useful, so +1 to packaging it. > > I don't know if there's a better solution. There is an R package called > tinytex > [1] that provides automatic installation of TeXLive packages in a user > library. > AFAIK, it just compiles

Dropping of sshd.socket unit

Dear colleagues, I've pushed a fresh build of OpenSSH to rawhide. We decided to drop the sshd.socket unit from rawhide. We don't think it's worth going through the changes process, but would like to provide a heads-up. See the details in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025716. -- D