Flock CFP: Language SIGs discussion

2023-07-04 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need representatives from various Language SIGs to be there (Rust, Haskell, OCaml, Golang and of course Python and older ecosystems like Perl, R, TeX come to mind i

Orphaning imgbased package

2023-07-04 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Hi, I orphaned the imgbased package. The package is part of the oVirt project and as far as I can tell nobody is using it on Fedora. The oVirt project has been developed by almost only Red Hat over the past few years and starting last year Red Hat also started offboarding the project. Nobody steppe

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 07. 23 16:51, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently conducted a Python 3.12mass rebuild in aside tag. We plan to ask releng to merge it today, despite several builds not succeeding. This has not happened yet, see https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11451 f

Re: How to use llvm15 for building a package

2023-07-04 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
> On 7/3/23 19:37, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > When I try to build from the rawhide branch, I get: > > /usr/include/OpenImageIO/detail/fmt/core.h:1691:7: error: static assertion > failed: Cannot > format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter > specialization: https://fmt.d

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Maxwell G
On Wed Jul 5, 2023 at 00:50 +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 05-07-2023 00:06, Maxwell G wrote: > > On Tue Jul 4, 2023 at 23:45 +0200, Sandro wrote: > > > >> I see one of my packages, python-fvs, in the list of failed builds. I'm > >> also one of the maintainers of Bottles, which requires python-fvs. > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 00:07 Maxwell G wrote: > On Tue Jul 4, 2023 at 23:45 +0200, Sandro wrote: > > > I see one of my packages, python-fvs, in the list of failed builds. I'm > > also one of the maintainers of Bottles, which requires python-fvs. > > Bottles itself is mostly Python code. I would ha

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Sandro
On 05-07-2023 00:06, Maxwell G wrote: On Tue Jul 4, 2023 at 23:45 +0200, Sandro wrote: I see one of my packages, python-fvs, in the list of failed builds. I'm also one of the maintainers of Bottles, which requires python-fvs. Bottles itself is mostly Python code. I would have expected Bottles t

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 05. 07. 23 0:06, Maxwell G wrote: AFAIK, the rebuild scripts only rebuild packages whose dependencies are available. Exactly. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Maxwell G
On Tue Jul 4, 2023 at 23:45 +0200, Sandro wrote: > I see one of my packages, python-fvs, in the list of failed builds. I'm > also one of the maintainers of Bottles, which requires python-fvs. > Bottles itself is mostly Python code. I would have expected Bottles to > be rebuild as well. With pyt

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 12:21 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 18:29 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 04. 07. 23 18:11, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 16:51 +0200, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > As you might already know, we have recentl

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Sandro
On 04-07-2023 16:51, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: As you might already know, we have recently conducted a Python 3.12mass rebuild in aside tag. We plan to ask releng to merge it today, despite several builds not succeeding. We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for too long

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 18:29 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 07. 23 18:11, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 16:51 +0200, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > As you might already know, we have recently conducted a Python 3.12mass > > > rebuild in aside tag. We plan to a

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 04/07/23 16:51, Tomáš Hrnčiar ha scritto: > Many packages only fail to build because their dependencies were not yet > rebuilt. Chances are, you will get an automated F39FailsToInstall bugzilla > soon, indicating your package fails to install. It would be really helpful if > you could find t

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 07. 23 20:11, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 7/4/23 10:51 AM, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: ## How to run things locally? You can use mock. Make sure to: 1. Clear all caches first: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64--scrub=all 2. Use the Koji repo: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=l

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 7/4/23 10:51 AM, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: ## How to run things locally? You can use mock. Make sure to:     1. Clear all caches first: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64--scrub=all     2. Use the Koji repo: $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local ... That doesn't appear correct. At

Re: OCaml 5 rebuild and i686

2023-07-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 09:16:52AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 03:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > We're planning to rebuild all the OCaml packages + dependencies with > the new OCaml 5 compiler (https://ocaml.org/releases/5.0.0).  This has > a rewritt

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 07. 23 18:08, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 16:51 +0200, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: We have verified the following comps groups are insatllable from the side tag: @core @critical-path-anaconda @critical-path-apps @critical-path-base @critical-path-build @critical-path-deepin-des

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 07. 23 18:11, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 16:51 +0200, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently conducted a Python 3.12mass rebuild in aside tag. We plan to ask releng to merge it today, despite several builds not succeeding. Also, it may

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

2023-07-04 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 7/4/23 11:49, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:32 AM Matthew Miller > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> I don't think there's a formal change filed yet. >>> >>> Matthew: Did you want to do that? Or would you like me or someone else

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 16:51 +0200, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: > Hello. > > As you might already know, we have recently conducted a Python 3.12mass > rebuild in aside tag. We plan to ask releng to merge it today, despite > several builds not succeeding. Also, it may be too late for this cycle now, but

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

2023-07-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2023-07-04 at 16:51 +0200, Tomáš Hrnčiar wrote: > We have verified the following comps groups are insatllable from the > side tag: > > @core > @critical-path-anaconda > @critical-path-apps > @critical-path-base > @critical-path-build > @critical-path-deepin-desktop > @critical-path-gnome

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

2023-07-04 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:32 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I don't think there's a formal change filed yet. > > > > Matthew: Did you want to do that? Or would you like me or someone else > > to do so? > > I would love someone else to

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Anaconda WebUI for Fedora Workstation by default (System-Wide)

2023-07-04 Thread Jiří Konečný
4. července 2023 0:44:41 SELČ, Neal Gompa napsal: >On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:36 PM Jiří Konečný wrote: >> >> Hi, see my replies below. >> >> 2. července 2023 23:56:59 SELČ, Demi Marie Obenour >> napsal: >> >On 6/27/23 05:00, Simon de Vlieger wrote: >> >> On 6/27/23 10:40, Hans de Goede wrote:

Re: OCaml 5 rebuild and i686

2023-07-04 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 03:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > We're planning to rebuild all the OCaml packages + dependencies with > the new OCaml 5 compiler (https://ocaml.org/releases/5.0.0). This has > a rewritten runtime system, and Jerry James has been doing amazing > work rebuilding everything

Re: How to deal with sysusers files inside the package

2023-07-04 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 10:15:35PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: I'm looking at converting my package (where I'm also the upstream) to use sysusers.d but I'd prefer shipping the sysusers.d file inside the source tarball rather than in packaging. This allows me to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230704.n.0 changes

2023-07-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230703.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230704.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 49 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 237.53 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: OCaml rebuild after or while Python 3 is rebuilding?

2023-07-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 10:15:40AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 07. 23 10:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >We'd like to rebuild OCaml packages for OCaml 5 before the mass > >rebuild starts, that is before 19th July (about 2 weeks): > > > >https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-ke

Re: OCaml rebuild after or while Python 3 is rebuilding?

2023-07-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 07. 23 10:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: We'd like to rebuild OCaml packages for OCaml 5 before the mass rebuild starts, that is before 19th July (about 2 weeks): https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-key-tasks.html The OCaml rebuild itself could take up to a week, but more l

OCaml rebuild after or while Python 3 is rebuilding?

2023-07-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
We'd like to rebuild OCaml packages for OCaml 5 before the mass rebuild starts, that is before 19th July (about 2 weeks): https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-key-tasks.html The OCaml rebuild itself could take up to a week, but more likely 3-4 days. However it seems as if Python 3.

OCaml 5 rebuild and i686

2023-07-04 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
We're planning to rebuild all the OCaml packages + dependencies with the new OCaml 5 compiler (https://ocaml.org/releases/5.0.0). This has a rewritten runtime system, and Jerry James has been doing amazing work rebuilding everything in a COPR and fixing lots of issues (https://copr.fedorainfraclou