Thank you for the info!
On úterý 2. května 2023 22:17:13 CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Fedora Release engineering was made aware recently that some real builds
> seemed to have been done from commits not in any branch in the main
> repository for the package. All cases we are
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:27 AM Sandro Mani wrote:
> AFAICS nodejs is generally broken in rawhide (both nodejs20 and nodejs18),
> i.e. just
>
> $ node
> >
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> gdb:
>
> Thread 3 "node" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x72f
Greetings everyone.
Fedora Release engineering was made aware recently that some real builds
seemed to have been done from commits not in any branch in the main
repository for the package. All cases we are currently aware of were
maintainers mistakenly building from a forked repo with a valid pull
Hi all,
On 2023-04-25, we removed inactive packagers from the packager group.
( full details at https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11271 )
This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
If th
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2023-05-02)
===
Meeting started by mhayden at 17:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-05-02/fesco.2023-05-02-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter seems to be unmaintained at this point.
There are a few open CVEs that have been corrected upstream in the last year
but not made it down to the fedora package.
In Feb I opened a maintainer check ticket :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216694
Good point. Thanks for the typo correction.
Best regards
Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:35 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:22 AM Josef Řídký wrote:
> >
> > A license of "gimp" package was corrected from
>
The license for speech-tools was corrected from MIT, to the correct
MIT-Festival. The change is already in rawhide.
Take care,
Lukáš
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraprojec
Exactly as Sam wrote, we only repackage the sources we get from the
maintainers. Very little we do on our own, because
there is often one maintainer for more than 20 packages in Fedora, so
there is no chance that he/she will be able to make those changes.
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 5:03 AM Sam Varsh
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:22 AM Josef Řídký wrote:
>
> A license of "gimp" package was corrected from
> GPLv3+ and GPLv3
> to
> GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-3.0-only AND BSD-3.0-Clause
>
Do you mean "BSD-3-Clause"? I don't know of a "BSD-3.0-Clause"...
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, the
A license of "gimp" package was corrected from
GPLv3+ and GPLv3
to
GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-3.0-only AND BSD-3.0-Clause
in Fedora Rawhide
Best regards
Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
__
Sorry for the late reply. I just got back to this issue.
> In general this (should) only happen if the binaries are really
> identical (e.g. when one of the packages build requires the other, but
> instead of linking/rebuilding some sources it simply copies a binary
> directly).
>
> The build-id
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:24 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James
> > .
On ti, 02 touko 2023, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm working on packaging pgadmin4-7.0, which bumped several python
dependencies, requiring multiple updates of existing fedora packages.
I started by building newer version of all direct dependencies in copr
[1], and then investigating the dependenc
I’ll look into this today. In the meanwhile, can you force the use of
node-18?
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 6:34 AM Vladimir Slavik wrote:
> We're seeing the same with anaconda webui - any invocation of node leads
> to segmentation fault - npm, npx... nothing works.
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:28 AM
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:26:27PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
ruby-augeas brandfbb, ignatenkobrain,0 weeks ago
orphan
Taken
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
We're seeing the same with anaconda webui - any invocation of node leads to
segmentation fault - npm, npx... nothing works.
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:28 AM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 02.05.23 11:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 4
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 12:24:35PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 05. 23 11:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >However I think there is a problem in your script because there is no
> >direct dependency from qemu to ucs-miscfixed-opentype-fonts. Instead
> >what seems to be happening is that a bi
On 02. 05. 23 11:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
However I think there is a problem in your script because there is no
direct dependency from qemu to ucs-miscfixed-opentype-fonts. Instead
what seems to be happening is that a binary subpackage of brltty
called brltty-xw does requires ucs-miscfixed-
(Adding qemu maintainers)
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 10:59:58AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:26:27PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Full report available at:
> > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-05-01.txt
> > grep it for your FAS username and follow th
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:26:27PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-05-01.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
So the one which appeared to break all the virt packages is
'ucs-miscfixed-fonts'
On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 11:27, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 02.05.23 11:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at
On 02.05.23 11:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James
...
I found a problem related with yarnpkg
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James
> ...
> > I found a problem related with yarnpkg rpm, the macro % __f
A license of "asciidoc" package was corrected from
GPL+ and GPLv2+
to
GPL-2.0-only
in Fedora Rawhide
Best regards
Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi
I'm working on packaging pgadmin4-7.0, which bumped several python
dependencies, requiring multiple updates of existing fedora packages. I
started by building newer version of all direct dependencies in copr
[1], and then investigating the dependencies trees of the direct
dependencies. So
We might be able to make it work with
https://www.npmjs.com/package/es-module-shims, do you mind opening a ticket on
FMN's tracker please?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr
27 matches
Mail list logo