Re: Real builds from forks fixed

2023-05-02 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Thank you for the info! On úterý 2. května 2023 22:17:13 CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > Fedora Release engineering was made aware recently that some real builds > seemed to have been done from commits not in any branch in the main > repository for the package. All cases we are

Re: nodejs broken?

2023-05-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:27 AM Sandro Mani wrote: > AFAICS nodejs is generally broken in rawhide (both nodejs20 and nodejs18), > i.e. just > > $ node > > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > gdb: > > Thread 3 "node" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread 0x72f

Real builds from forks fixed

2023-05-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings everyone. Fedora Release engineering was made aware recently that some real builds seemed to have been done from commits not in any branch in the main repository for the package. All cases we are currently aware of were maintainers mistakenly building from a forked repo with a valid pull

inactive packagers removed from packager group

2023-05-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Hi all, On 2023-04-25, we removed inactive packagers from the packager group. ( full details at https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11271 ) This is in accordance with the FESCo policy on inactive packagers: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/ If th

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-05-02)

2023-05-02 Thread Major Hayden via devel
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2023-05-02) === Meeting started by mhayden at 17:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-05-02/fesco.2023-05-02-17.00.log.html . Meeting summary -

Stuck package - golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter

2023-05-02 Thread Pat Riehecky
golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter seems to be unmaintained at this point. There are a few open CVEs that have been corrected upstream in the last year but not made it down to the fedora package. In Feb I opened a maintainer check ticket : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216694

Re: gimp license corrected

2023-05-02 Thread Josef Řídký
Good point. Thanks for the typo correction. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 2:35 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:22 AM Josef Řídký wrote: > > > > A license of "gimp" package was corrected from >

Speech-tools license corrected

2023-05-02 Thread Lukáš Tyrychtr
The license for speech-tools was corrected from MIT, to the correct MIT-Festival. The change is already in rawhide. Take care, Lukáš ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: F39 proposal: Man-pages-ru Retirement (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-05-02 Thread Lukas Javorsky
Exactly as Sam wrote, we only repackage the sources we get from the maintainers. Very little we do on our own, because there is often one maintainer for more than 20 packages in Fedora, so there is no chance that he/she will be able to make those changes. On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 5:03 AM Sam Varsh

Re: gimp license corrected

2023-05-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:22 AM Josef Řídký wrote: > > A license of "gimp" package was corrected from > GPLv3+ and GPLv3 > to > GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-3.0-only AND BSD-3.0-Clause > Do you mean "BSD-3-Clause"? I don't know of a "BSD-3.0-Clause"... -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, the

gimp license corrected

2023-05-02 Thread Josef Řídký
A license of "gimp" package was corrected from GPLv3+ and GPLv3 to GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-3.0-only AND BSD-3.0-Clause in Fedora Rawhide Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. __

Re: Conflicting build-ids in nekovm and haxe

2023-05-02 Thread Andy Li
Sorry for the late reply. I just got back to this issue. > In general this (should) only happen if the binaries are really > identical (e.g. when one of the packages build requires the other, but > instead of linking/rebuilding some sources it simply copies a binary > directly). > > The build-id

Re: nodejs broken?

2023-05-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 5:24 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James > > .

Re: How to handle updates with large python dependency chains?

2023-05-02 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On ti, 02 touko 2023, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm working on packaging pgadmin4-7.0, which bumped several python dependencies, requiring multiple updates of existing fedora packages. I started by building newer version of all direct dependencies in copr [1], and then investigating the dependenc

Re: nodejs broken?

2023-05-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
I’ll look into this today. In the meanwhile, can you force the use of node-18? On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 6:34 AM Vladimir Slavik wrote: > We're seeing the same with anaconda webui - any invocation of node leads > to segmentation fault - npm, npx... nothing works. > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:28 AM

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2023-05-02 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:26:27PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: ruby-augeas brandfbb, ignatenkobrain,0 weeks ago orphan Taken ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: nodejs broken?

2023-05-02 Thread Vladimir Slavik
We're seeing the same with anaconda webui - any invocation of node leads to segmentation fault - npm, npx... nothing works. On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:28 AM Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 02.05.23 11:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 4

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2023-05-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 12:24:35PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 02. 05. 23 11:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >However I think there is a problem in your script because there is no > >direct dependency from qemu to ucs-miscfixed-opentype-fonts. Instead > >what seems to be happening is that a bi

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2023-05-02 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 02. 05. 23 11:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: However I think there is a problem in your script because there is no direct dependency from qemu to ucs-miscfixed-opentype-fonts. Instead what seems to be happening is that a binary subpackage of brltty called brltty-xw does requires ucs-miscfixed-

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2023-05-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
(Adding qemu maintainers) On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 10:59:58AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:26:27PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Full report available at: > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-05-01.txt > > grep it for your FAS username and follow th

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2023-05-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 10:26:27PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Full report available at: > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-05-01.txt > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. So the one which appeared to break all the virt packages is 'ucs-miscfixed-fonts'

Re: nodejs broken?

2023-05-02 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 11:27, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > On 02.05.23 11:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at

Re: nodejs broken?

2023-05-02 Thread Sandro Mani
On 02.05.23 11:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James ... I found a problem related with yarnpkg

Re: nodejs broken?

2023-05-02 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James > ... > > I found a problem related with yarnpkg rpm, the macro % __f

asciidoc license corrected

2023-05-02 Thread Josef Řídký
A license of "asciidoc" package was corrected from GPL+ and GPLv2+ to GPL-2.0-only in Fedora Rawhide Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

How to handle updates with large python dependency chains?

2023-05-02 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'm working on packaging pgadmin4-7.0, which bumped several python dependencies, requiring multiple updates of existing fedora packages. I started by building newer version of all direct dependencies in copr [1], and then investigating the dependencies trees of the direct dependencies. So

Re: The new version of Fedora Messaging Notifications will arrive this week

2023-05-02 Thread Aurelien Bompard
We might be able to make it work with https://www.npmjs.com/package/es-module-shims, do you mind opening a ticket on FMN's tracker please? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr