[Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.4 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the curr

Re: subarchitectures and RISC-V, was Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/11/23 19:14, przemek klosowski via devel wrote: On 4/4/23 10:28, Dan Čermák wrote: Chris Adams writes: Yeah, it'd be back to the i386/i586/i686 days... which was a bit of a PITA sometimes.  But cramming multiple architectures of core libraries into a single RPM would be bad for disk sp

Re: Any interest in maintaining spyder (python IDE)?

If you can do a review on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2186056 it will help unblock the updates. On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 8:46 PM Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > On 4/3/23 12:53, Blaise Pabon wrote: > > Hi Mukundan, Jonathan, > > I have been working on becoming a fedora maintai

subarchitectures and RISC-V, was Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/4/23 10:28, Dan Čermák wrote: Chris Adams writes: Yeah, it'd be back to the i386/i586/i686 days... which was a bit of a PITA sometimes. But cramming multiple architectures of core libraries into a single RPM would be bad for disk space, image size, downloads, etc. But something that did

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said: >> On Tue, Apr 11 2023 at 12:18:58 PM -0500, Chris Adams >> wrote: >>>I wouldn't do that part; that's additional disk I/O for every prompt. >>>Especially when the system might be having issues, users (especially >>>root) don't need so

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said: > On Tue, Apr 11 2023 at 12:18:58 PM -0500, Chris Adams > wrote: > >I wouldn't do that part; that's additional disk I/O for every prompt. > >Especially when the system might be having issues, users (especially > >root) don't need something interfering wit

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

On Tue, Apr 11 2023 at 12:18:58 PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: I wouldn't do that part; that's additional disk I/O for every prompt. Especially when the system might be having issues, users (especially root) don't need something interfering with every command. This would mean an NFS home would in

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

On 4/11/23 19:20, Adam Williamson wrote: The version I use is a file in /etc/profile.d that does this: HISTSIZE=1048576 HISTFILESIZE=1048576 LAST_HISTORY_WRITE=$SECONDS function prompt_command { if [ $(($SECONDS - $LAST_HISTORY_WRITE)) -gt 60 ]; then history -a && history -c && h

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

Chris Murphy wrote: > I've implemented the suggested two line change to > .bash_profile: > > # User specific environment and startup programs > shopt -s histappend > PROMPT_COMMAND="history -a;$PROMPT_COMMAND" > [...] > Any thoughts? As others have said, enabling this by default has consequences

Re: [HEADS UP] util-linux based on new mount API coming to rawhide/f39

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:05 PM Colin Walters wrote: > Looks like this broke our mounting of zram: > > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1462 To follow up on this, I filed https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2161 upstream with the requested logs. _

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:48:11AM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > For a long time I've noticed lost history from multiple Terminal tab/windows. > It seems like the last tab or window to close is the history that gets > written to .bash_history, and everything else is just lost. > > Someho

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 13:06 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, at 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I've been doing something like this for years, but I wouldn't > > necessarily recommend it as an OOTB default. It has some interesting > > subtleties, like the order of the c

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > I've implemented the suggested two line change to .bash_profile: > > # User specific environment and startup programs > shopt -s histappend This is already in the default /etc/bashrc, at least on Fedora 37 on CentOS 7 (systems at hand I checked). > PROMPT_

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 13:15 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, at 12:02 PM, stan via devel wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:48:11 -0400 > > "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > For a long time I've noticed lost history from multiple Terminal > > > tab/windows. It s

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, at 12:02 PM, stan via devel wrote: > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:48:11 -0400 > "Chris Murphy" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> For a long time I've noticed lost history from multiple Terminal >> tab/windows. It seems like the last tab or window to close is the >> history that gets written

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-04-11)

We didn't really have quoroum today, so the meeting ended up being canceled. Meeting ended Tue Apr 11 17:07:51 2023 UTC. Information about Zodbot's MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-04-11/fesco.2023-

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023, at 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I've been doing something like this for years, but I wouldn't > necessarily recommend it as an OOTB default. It has some interesting > subtleties, like the order of the command history you get when you hit > 'up' changes depending on wh

Re: [HEADS UP] util-linux based on new mount API coming to rawhide/f39

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Karel Zak wrote: > Hey all, > > > util-linux v2.39-rc1 coming to rawhide, Release Notes: > https://kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.39/v2.39-ReleaseNotes > > I usually don't report util-linux Fedora updates, but this one is > special. This new version

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

On Tue, 2023-04-11 at 10:48 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > For a long time I've noticed lost history from multiple Terminal tab/windows. > It seems like the last tab or window to close is the history that gets > written to .bash_history, and everything else is just lost. > > Somehow I fou

Re: default bash history (non)preservation

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:48:11 -0400 "Chris Murphy" wrote: > Hi, > > For a long time I've noticed lost history from multiple Terminal > tab/windows. It seems like the last tab or window to close is the > history that gets written to .bash_history, and everything else is > just lost. > > Somehow I

default bash history (non)preservation

Hi, For a long time I've noticed lost history from multiple Terminal tab/windows. It seems like the last tab or window to close is the history that gets written to .bash_history, and everything else is just lost. Somehow I found this: https://web.archive.org/web/20090815205011/http://www.cuberi

Re: Self Introduction: Miguel Bernal Marin

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:16:07AM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > On 4/11/23 00:10, Joe Doss wrote: > > On 4/8/23 7:52 PM, Miguel Bernal Marin wrote: > >> Hi Fedora community, > >> > >> My name is Miguel Bernal Marin and usually my nickname is miguelinux, > >> I work at Intel corporation in Guadalaja

Re: Self Introduction: Miguel Bernal Marin

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 04:10:24PM -0500, Joe Doss wrote: > On 4/8/23 7:52 PM, Miguel Bernal Marin wrote: > > Hi Fedora community, > > > > My name is Miguel Bernal Marin and usually my nickname is miguelinux, > > I work at Intel corporation in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico and I would like > > to a

Re: Recommendations for patching bundled meson subprojects

Maybe ask https://github.com/mesonbuild/mocklibc ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-co

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 38 RC 20230411.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 38 RC 20230411.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230411.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230409.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230411.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 1 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230411.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230410.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230411.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 66 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.13 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Recommendations for patching bundled meson subprojects

I need to patch the bundled mocklib in accountsservice to fix a build issue with future compilers: accountsservice: C99 compatibility issue in bundled copy of mocklib The RPM spec file copies mocklibc-1.0.tar.gz and mocklibc-1.0-2-wrap.zip

Re: TeXLive 2023

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 09:32, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 11:19:37PM +0200, Iñaki Ucar napsal(a): > > I'm not sure what could be the issue, but I can reproduce this by > > creating the simplest hello-world package containing: > > > > Recommends: tex(latex) > > > > When I build thi

python-orjson Review Swap

Hi everyone, I'm looking for a review swap for python-orjson [1], preferably something in Go or Python. This package is needed by newer versions of bottles and is starting to be used by other Python projects as well. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184237 -- Thanks, Maxwell G

Re: TeXLive 2023

V Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 11:19:37PM +0200, Iñaki Ucar napsal(a): > I'm not sure what could be the issue, but I can reproduce this by > creating the simplest hello-world package containing: > > Recommends: tex(latex) > > When I build this package and try to install it in Fedora <= 38, > texlive is p

Re: purpose of dummy-test-package-* updates?

Il 10/04/23 17:50, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 03:18:22PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >> Il 10/04/23 17:01, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: >>> I've not seen any errors from it in a long while... but I'm not sure if >>> thats because everything has been working or because it