Hello
I'd like to unretire nvi
nvi is retired because the upstream kotnet.org disappeared,
Just use another source from git/Debian/Slackware can fix it.
BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183721
releng: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11370
Could anyone review it? thanks
Oh, and I forgot one important thing. Any sponsor that would disagree
with being assigned tickets this way would be able to opt out by
adding something like `auto_assign: false` to their sponsor.yaml
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-sponsors#b-your-personal-config-on-fedorapeopleorg
Jakub
On Sat
Hello,
I've set myself a goal to improve the package review process. My first
step was creating https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors , I am
currently working on https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
and contribute to the `fedora-review` tool. I have some ideas about
what to do next,
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
> by the Fedora Engineering Steering Com
OLD: Fedora-38-20230331.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230401.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 65
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.87 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Thanks; you’re correct. At least I got the year right!
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023, at 8:47 AM, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Should this be 2023-04-07? 2023-03-07 has been weeks ago ?
>
> On 3/31/23, Ben Beasley wrote:
>> In one week (2023-03-07), or slightly later, I plant to update
>> fast_float to 4.0.0[1]
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:25 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > I will submit systemd-tests-251.14-2.fc37 with the patch.
> > I doubt that it solves the issue completely, but it shouldn't make
> > it worse, so let's at l
Should this be 2023-04-07? 2023-03-07 has been weeks ago ?
On 3/31/23, Ben Beasley wrote:
> In one week (2023-03-07), or slightly later, I plant to update
> fast_float to 4.0.0[1] in Rawhide. This new major release contains one
> small but technically incompatible change: errc::result_out_of_rang
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230331.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230401.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 70
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 2.13 MiB
Size of dropped packages:9.11
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 12:04 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As a brief summary:
>
> - The Node.js repackaging change [1-2] was accepted for F38.
> - Packages nodejs16 and nodejs18 were created without any review [3-4] (?).
This is fine, packages that are only alternative versions of existing
pa
On 01/04/2023 13:10, Jiri Vanek wrote:
I would heavily recomend to use alternatives for this,a nd thus
remain aligned with other major runtimes.
Alternatives can't be used on immutable Fedora versions (Silverblue,
Kinoite, etc).
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
Hello! I woudl like to -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging#Feedback -
add, that also java is using alternatives for major versions of jdk
switching. Weahve master java - to switch runtime, and javac to switch
devel subpackages.
Man pages are also slaves to the java/javac ma
Hi,
As a brief summary:
- The Node.js repackaging change [1-2] was accepted for F38.
- Packages nodejs16 and nodejs18 were created without any review [3-4] (?).
- Package nodejs20 was created a month ago, but I didn't find any
review request. Why?
- This repackaging has been pushed to F37 too. Wh
13 matches
Mail list logo
