Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2023/03/30 13:04:
Hello team,
Blender 3.5.0 got released today at this time of writing. Unfortunately,
failure occurred with the following link possibly related to cycles:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=99301805
Can someone investigate the proble
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2023-04-03
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again!
If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
email and
# F38 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2023-04-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Final blockers and 2 proposed Final freeze
exception issues to review, so let's have a review meeting.
If you have time this weekend, you can take a
OLD: Fedora-38-20230330.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230331.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 49
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 3.34 MiB
Size of dropped packages:199.45 KiB
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 38 Branched 20230331.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 31. 03. 23 13:58, Petr Menšík wrote:
Is there also documented and preferred way to apply just single patch when
%autosetup -N -S git is used? I mean, if I want to have all patches applied
git-like way, I know I can use -m or -M parameters to %autopatch. But
%autopatch -m 1 -M 1 does not look
Hello all.
It looks like strip is broken in Rawhide. Affected package -
telegram-desktop.
Fedora 38 binary size: 83,563,448 bytes. Rawhide binary size: 98,968,520
bytes.
Builds:
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25349 (F38)
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:09 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> I will submit systemd-tests-251.14-2.fc37 with the patch.
> I doubt that it solves the issue completely, but it shouldn't make
> it worse, so let's at least do this for now.
Thank you, I see it's still being built in koji. I w
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:37:16PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:33 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 02:25:33PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:10 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 11:40:28AM -, Ondřej Mejzlík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the past week I have been having issues pushing changes into my own fork
> of a package.
>
> Here is what I have done:
> (All of this used to work fine about a week ago, my steps are always the
> same.)
>
> Click the
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 08:49:40AM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying add the user kgold as a co-maintainer to the tss2 package.
> Peter added him to the packagers group the other week. Ken shows
> up in the packagers group when I look at his profile in FAS, and
> it shows for him
One thing to note is that the new format doesn’t work with EPEL
releases; I had to revert to the %patchN style for them.
On 29 Mar 2023, at 3:53, Florian Festi wrote:
On 3/29/23 10:31, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Has `%patchN` been deprecated in favour of `%patch N`?
Yes, see %patch section on
Hi,
I'm trying add the user kgold as a co-maintainer to the tss2 package.
Peter added him to the packagers group the other week. Ken shows
up in the packagers group when I look at his profile in FAS, and
it shows for him as well. Ken has logged out and back in, but
every time I've tried to add use
The current target is the early target date (18 April).
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. kernel — anaconda failed to detect the fcoe target(only affects ixgbe) — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose issue
NEEDINFO: lnie
2. plasma-workspace — Logging out
On 3/31/23 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19
>
>> == Detailed Description ==
>> RPM 4.19 contains various improvements over previous versions. Many of
>> them are internal in nature such as mov
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 4:00 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Out of curiosity, are you considering also package downgrades?
>
It's not described in OpenLDAP Upstream docs, so I was not trying to cover
that, but...
It's a good idea to add the check and do the same safety precautions I do
with the upgrade.
Dne 31. 03. 23 v 15:40 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
* Creating User and Groups from sysusers.d files including Provides
and Requires or Recommends
I may have cried a little bit in joy here. This is huge!
Yes! Huge thanks for this.
Miroslav
___
devel
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19
> == Detailed Description ==
> RPM 4.19 contains various improvements over previous versions. Many of
> them are internal in nature such as moving from automake to cmake,
> improvements to the te
In one week (2023-03-07), or slightly later, I plant to update
fast_float to 4.0.0[1] in Rawhide. This new major release contains one
small but technically incompatible change: errc::result_out_of_range is
now set on over/underflow. A PR[2] is ready, and I have already verified
(by local mock b
Dne 30. 03. 23 v 20:38 Simon Pichugin napsal(a):
When the server package upgrades to the next major version, there are upgrade instructions that need to be performed
by the administrator.
And what's most important, the server should not start automatically without
explicit agreement from the ad
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230330.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230331.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:9
Upgraded packages: 126
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 158.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
when i run i-nex on fedora 38 i get a core dump [1] see debugging-i-nex.txt
I have compiled i-nex [2] with a new patch, since a newer libcpuid version is
used on fedora 38.
I cannot expect any help from upstream, as development has been discontinued in
the meantime.
[1] https://martinkg.fed
I would suggest creating at least self-contained change on Fedora to
describe what has changed and why. Those syntax might be a little weird,
but were used quite often. It would be nice to have some place to read
about it. Because frankly it just started warning when used, but I do
not remember
Hi,
For the past week I have been having issues pushing changes into my own fork of
a package.
Here is what I have done:
(All of this used to work fine about a week ago, my steps are always the same.)
Click the Fork button for example here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ppp/tree/
fedpkg c
Out of curiosity, are you considering also package downgrades?
Vít
Dne 30. 03. 23 v 20:38 Simon Pichugin napsal(a):
Hi folks,
Thank you for the answers!
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 1:16 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
I wonder what the "do something" is, because comparing versions is
almost alwa
25 matches
Mail list logo
