On 3/21/23 08:18, Riya Bisht wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in reviewing packages. Can you tell me how do I start ?
> I'm beginner trying to understand fedora packaging.
>
Welcome to Fedora!
https://jamezone.org/pleasure/software/Fedora/packager/
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-m
Hello,
I'm interested in reviewing packages. Can you tell me how do I start ? I'm
beginner trying to understand fedora packaging.
Thanks.
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, 8:58 am Jerry James, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am in need of some package reviews, and am happy to swap. First, I
> think I have finall
Hi all,
I am in need of some package reviews, and am happy to swap. First, I
think I have finally beaten MuseScore 4.x into good enough shape for
Fedora. This has been a months-long process. I need some font
reviews:
makemusic-finale-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
e
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
* Ron Olson:
> Hey all-
>
> I got this issue in my GH account I use for building Swift for Fedora:
> https://github.com/tachoknight/swift-lang-packaging-fedora/issues/2. The
> TL;DR is that the person was trying to build Swift on Rawhide which he
> moved to from an older version of Fedora. This tr
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CloudEC2IMDSv2Only
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Commi
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CloudEC2gp3
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 3:34 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 20/03/2023 19:39, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > I think it would look cleaner to name them according to the plugins, so
> > that it would be:
> >
> > %files -n libheif-libde265
> > %{_libdir}/libheif/libheif-libde265.so
> >
> > %file
On 20/03/2023 19:39, Kalev Lember wrote:
I think it would look cleaner to name them according to the plugins, so
that it would be:
%files -n libheif-libde265
%{_libdir}/libheif/libheif-libde265.so
%files -n libheif-x265
%{_libdir}/libheif/libheif-x265.so
Or this:
%files -n libheif-heic
%{_l
As a workaround until the dust settles, I did a dnf downgrade of libheif and
added an exclude in dnf.conf. I'll revert that when the add-ons are published.
Steve
On 3/20/23 02:39 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 7:29 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel mailto:devel@lists.fedora
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 7:29 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 20/03/2023 17:08, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Going forward, I'm going to turn it into an add-on package, i.e. ship
> > only the two plugins we can't ship in Fedora:
>
> In a subpack
On 20/03/2023 17:08, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Going forward, I'm going to turn it into an add-on package, i.e. ship
only the two plugins we can't ship in Fedora:
In a subpackage libheif-freeworld?
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
_
Hi, Sandro.
On Sunday, 19 March 2023 at 13:14, Sandro wrote:
[...]
> Dominik, since you picked up the RPMFusion package, which conflicts
> with the new Fedora package, could you bring me up to speed what needs
> (is planned to) happen with the RPMFusion package?
For now, the Fedora package has a
===
#fedora-meeting-2: Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG
===
Meeting started by kalev at 15:03:20 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-03-20/flatpak-sig.2023-
Hi there,
On 2023-03-19 08:14, Sandro wrote:
Dominik, since you picked up the RPMFusion package, which conflicts with
the new Fedora package, could you bring me up to speed what needs (is
planned to) happen with the RPMFusion package
The Fedora packaged libheif came through as a stable update y
Hey all-
I got this issue in my GH account I use for building Swift for Fedora:
https://github.com/tachoknight/swift-lang-packaging-fedora/issues/2. The
TL;DR is that the person was trying to build Swift on Rawhide which he
moved to from an older version of Fedora. This tracks with something I
OLD: Fedora-38-20230319.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230320.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 45
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230319.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230320.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 83
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:575.83
Hi Bob,
On 19/03/2023 10:18, Robert-André Mauchin via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected:
xine-lib
xine-lib has been moved to Fedora.
Regards,
Xavier
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
19 matches
Mail list logo
