Re: F38 proposal: Noto CJK Variable Fonts (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:37 AM wrote: > At least for Evince it is using fonts from host since it refer to paths > like /run/host/whatever > > And also during the swap, there was a stage where no google noto CJK > fonts are installed (removed one and have not installed the other) and > in that ca

Re: Fedora Linux 38 Beta Released

> Fedora Linux 38 Beta Released Thanks upgrade from F37 smooth ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/proje

Re: Status of AVIF support in Fedora

I can give sponsorship and acl's for the rpmfusion package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/c

Re: Status of AVIF support in Fedora

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:17 PM Sandro wrote: > > Apologies for my late response. I have been swamped with other things... > > On 27-02-2023 16:05, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > >>

Re: Status of AVIF support in Fedora

Apologies for my late response. I have been swamped with other things... On 27-02-2023 16:05, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: It looks like libheif now supports a plugin architecture, so we could

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 05:57:53PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I also stand by what I wrote above. Kevin's words that "there is still > > nothing preventing an already rejected feature from being surprisingly > > reconsidered after the change deadli

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

The guidelines/requirements around things like the license tag are not set in stone. If people think they are impractical or otherwise should be revised, anyone should feel free to make a proposal. I think so far, though, I am not seeing evidence of major impracticality (for the kinds of issues tha

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

David Cantrell wrote: > We can't get rid of the License tag, unfortunately. See: > > https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/blog/spdx-its-already-in-use-for-global-software-bill-of-materials-sbom-and-supply-chain-security > > And as part of the US Executive Order on Cybersecurity, we need to start

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Normally, I wouldn't phrase a letter this way. But Kevin will incessantly > repeat the same things after a decision is made that he disagrees with > or when there is some fact that he doesn't like. So you are now accusing me of disagreeing with facts? Seriously

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:23 PM Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > On 3/14/23 10:04, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 08:47 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >> ... LibreOffice ... > > FWIW I updated the LibreOffice one a while ago and ended up with: > > MPL-2.0 AND Apache-2.0 AND LGPL-3.

Re: perl-String-Approx license corrected

V Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 03:25:56PM +0100, Petr Pisar napsal(a): > perl-String-Approx license was corrected from: > > LGPLv2+ or Artistic > > to: > > (LGPL-2.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl) AND (Artistic-2.0 OR > LGPL-2.0-only) > And since it's still not accurate, I opened

Re: F38 proposal: Noto CJK Variable Fonts (Self-Contained Change proposal)

在 2023-03-15星期三的 00:08 +0900，Akira TAGOH写道： > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:44 PM wrote: > > > > With some layering package trick, yes, all behavior returned to > > before. > > after the swap. > > Aha. Thank you for testing. Hmm, that is interesting... > > > Also, at least for Evince it can tell m

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

On 3/14/23 10:04, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 08:47 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: ... LibreOffice ... FWIW I updated the LibreOffice one a while ago and ended up with: MPL-2.0 AND Apache-2.0 AND LGPL-3.0-only AND LGPL-3.0-or-later AND CC0- 1.0 AND BSD-3-Clause AND (LGPL-2.1-o

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

On Tue, Mar 14 2023 at 10:01:06 AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote: And as part of the US Executive Order on Cybersecurity, we need to start using SPDX identifiers in software we package and provide so that our downstream users are in compliance: If you rely on this then you're up a creek, becau

Re: F38 proposal: Noto CJK Variable Fonts (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:44 PM wrote: > > With some layering package trick, yes, all behavior returned to before. > after the swap. Aha. Thank you for testing. Hmm, that is interesting... > Also, at least for Evince it can tell me what font it is using, and in > this case it's google-noto-sans

Re: [SONAME BUMP] ffmpeg upgrade to 6.0 in F38 and Rawhide

> Hey all, > > ffmpeg is getting upgraded to 6.0 for Fedora Linux 38 and Rawhide in > order to remain compatible with prominent third-party repositories. > Thank you for keeping up. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:31 AM Sandro wrote: > > On 27-01-2023 00:15, Sandro wrote: > >> I'm not sure I can commit to maintaining these myself, though. Let me > >> know if you're interested in helping out. > > Yes, orjson has been mentioned by @atim and @thunderbirdtr, the > > co-maintainers, in

Re: F38 proposal: Noto CJK Variable Fonts (Self-Contained Change proposal)

With some layering package trick, yes, all behavior returned to before. after the swap. Also, at least for Evince it can tell me what font it is using, and in this case it's google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts or VF version. 在 2023-03-14星期二的 23:14 +0900，Akira TAGOH写道： > > Thank you for the feedback. > >

Fedora Linux 38 Beta Released

Fedora Linux 38 Beta Released -- The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Fedora Linux 38 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora Linux 38 release at the end of April. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: *

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:04:12PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 08:47 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > ... LibreOffice ... > > FWIW I updated the LibreOffice one a while ago and ended up with: > MPL-2.0 AND Apache-2.0 AND LGPL-3.0-only AND LGPL-3.0-or-later AND CC0- > 1

perl-String-Approx license corrected

perl-String-Approx license was corrected from: LGPLv2+ or Artistic to: (LGPL-2.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl) AND (Artistic-2.0 OR LGPL-2.0-only) -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora

Re: F38 proposal: Noto CJK Variable Fonts (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Thank you for the feedback. What if you install google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts instead of google-noto-sans-cjk-vf-fonts? just wanted to make sure if this is a variable font-related issue or design-related update in Noto CJK. Also, good to try on non-flatpak app too. it is a bit complicated to make sur

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 08:47 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > ... LibreOffice ... FWIW I updated the LibreOffice one a while ago and ended up with: MPL-2.0 AND Apache-2.0 AND LGPL-3.0-only AND LGPL-3.0-or-later AND CC0- 1.0 AND BSD-3-Clause AND (LGPL-2.1-only OR SISSL) AND (MPL-2.0 OR LGPL- 3.0-or

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 08:47:36AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14 2023 at 09:37:25 AM -0400, David Cantrell > wrote: > > There may > > be longer examples. > > Uh, yeah. texlive's is bad enough but I'm skeptical that that's close to a > worst-case. Proponents of this style of lic

Re: F38 proposal: Noto CJK Variable Fonts (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Hi, Seems that some changes mentioned below just hit fedora:fedora/38/x86_64/testing/silverblue today in version 38.20230314.0. And ostree diff is below (changes between 38.20230313.0 and 38.20230314.0, filtered to show only fontconfig files for CJK): D/usr/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-google-noto-s

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

On Tue, Mar 14 2023 at 09:37:25 AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote: There may be longer examples. Uh, yeah. texlive's is bad enough but I'm skeptical that that's close to a worst-case. Proponents of this style of license tag should try this exercise for WebKitGTK, Chromium, Firefox, LibreOffice,

Re: Fwd: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later

On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 04:41:04PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 6:58 PM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 10 2023 at 04:17:13 PM -0500, Matthew Miller > > wrote: > > > Yeah, this is a change from previous guidance. Instead of trying to > > > calculate > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230314.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230313.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230314.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 124 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.93 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230314.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230313.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230314.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 183 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.26 MiB Size of dropped packages:4.03 MiB Size

Re: Release rpkg-1.66 and fedpkg-1.44

On 13. 03. 23 21:53, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 9.3.2023 klo 13.17: On 09. 03. 23 10:05, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 8.3.2023 klo 17.29: However, maybe it does not work as I expected? [python-setuptools (bundles %)]$ fedpkg prep Not downloading already

(Non-)Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-14)

There is nothing on the agenda; the meeting is cancelled. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = #2962 Change: MinGW toolchain update https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2962 APPROVED (+6,0,-0) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Re: Release rpkg-1.66 and fedpkg-1.44

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:53:41PM +0200, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: > Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 9.3.2023 klo 13.17: > > On 09. 03. 23 10:05, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: > > > Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 8.3.2023 klo 17.29: > > > > > > > > However, maybe it does not work as I expected? > > > > > > > > [python-s

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

On 10. 03. 23 18:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I've reopenedhttps://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2951 and will try to find a compromise that has a chance of approval. But shouldn't it have to start completely over since we rejected it? Exactly, that's why I said in the ticket "No proposal yet". Once a prop

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Hunor Csomortáni wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > * #2951 Proposal: policy for res

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:28:58AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Neal Gompa: > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 4:37 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > >> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > >> > >> > * #2951 Proposal: policy for resubmitting rejected proposals (zbyszek, > >> > 17:07:47) > >> > * AG

Re: Copr drops sqlite databases and AppStream from repo metadata

On 14/03/2023 08:19, Pavel Raiskup wrote: We already have AppStream metadata disabled by default for new projects, but there are many old projects where having this enabled causes problems here and there. So we plan to disable it manually even for old projects: Please keep it enabled for prelo

Copr drops sqlite databases and AppStream from repo metadata

Just a heads-up for a wider audience about two upcoming Copr changes. We already have AppStream metadata disabled by default for new projects, but there are many old projects where having this enabled causes problems here and there. So we plan to disable it manually even for old projects: h