tl;dr - you converted 892 tags in 14 days, statistics script now does not mention recently introduced packages and you
can put your package on ignore list
Two weeks ago we had:
* 23060 spec files in Fedora
* 29449license tags in all spec files
* 21194 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 2:16 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Some user-facing applications will be able to display the latest
> > versions of the FontAwesome icons, which have undergone a number of
> > updates and cleanups to provide a more pleasing look. In addition,
> > many new icons have been ad
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> So basically we are stuck with the status quo. Meaning that there is
>> still nothing preventing an already rejected feature from being
>> surprisingly reconsidered after the change dead
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 11:41:09AM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > I am doing the conversion of license tags in my projects and i have a
> > project where some files are under the GPL-2.0-or-later license and other
> > under the GPL-3.0-or-later license. Perhaps this has been mentioned
> > somewhe
> Some user-facing applications will be able to display the latest
> versions of the FontAwesome icons, which have undergone a number of
> updates and cleanups to provide a more pleasing look. In addition,
> many new icons have been added in the 5.x and 6.x versions. For
> example, version 6.x co
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:59:32AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Note that at least 2 of us voted for this proposal with a note that it's
> better than status quo and hence not worth rejecting, but we'd rather see a
> better solution.
I think there's a desire to try and prevent surprises, but al
OLD: Fedora-38-20230309.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230310.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:54:06AM +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> >
> > The above is done by about 2.5 people (counting multiple volunteers as 1
> > person). This goes up at times and goes down but for the last year has been
> > about that.
>
> An aside - how/where does one volunteer to help releng?
F38 Beta is go, so it's time to look at final blockers. The current
target is the early target date (18 April).
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. fcoe-utils — anaconda failed to detect the fcoe target(only affects
ixgbe) — NEW
ACTION: Maintainer to diagn
perl-SDL-2.548-17.fc39 will correct a license tag from (LGPL-2.1-or-later) to
(LGPL-2.1-or-later AND (GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl)).
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
Here's another "surprise for the new user" that I suggest being added.
What does the % character mean?
Sometimes it's the beginning of a section. Sometimes it's a macro.
I see now that the web page color codes the two differently,
but that's not obvious.
It would be helpful to explain that ear
Thanks all for the input.
Maybe there was some issue in COPR and/or rawhide at the
> time those packages were signed which caused them to fail
> verification now? It may be worth trying to rebuild them to
> see if they can be properly signed?
>
I resubmitted the affected packages and now everythi
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230309.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230310.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 96
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.12 MiB
Size of dropped packages:4.03
On 10. 03. 23 9:59, Hunor Csomortáni wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
* #2951 Proposal: policy for resubmitting rejected proposals (zbyszek,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:46 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:49:24AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > * #2951 Proposal: policy for resubmitting rejected proposals (zbyszek,
> > > 17:07:47)
> > > * AGREED: FE
>
> The above is done by about 2.5 people (counting multiple volunteers as 1
> person). This goes up at times and goes down but for the last year has been
> about that.
An aside - how/where does one volunteer to help releng?
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 21:22, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Ma
16 matches
Mail list logo
