On Sat, 2023-03-04 at 02:25 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2023, 02:21 Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 15:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > Interestingly, this is only the case for the F38 update. Check the F39
> > > update:
> > > https://bodhi.fed
On Sat, Mar 4, 2023, 02:21 Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 15:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Interestingly, this is only the case for the F38 update. Check the F39
> > update:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-23789cd657
> >
> > it's *only* in @criti
On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 15:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Interestingly, this is only the case for the F38 update. Check the F39
> update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-23789cd657
>
> it's *only* in @critical-path-build, it's not in @core or the kde,
> gnome or server
On 04. 03. 23 0:31, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 22:24 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 03. 23 20:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 18:37 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed in
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f34afe57a9
https://bo
On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 22:24 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 03. 23 20:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 18:37 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I've noticed in
> > >
> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f34afe57a9
> > > https://bodhi.fedorapr
Hi
I'll build rust-imagequant-sys in rawhide shortly in the side-tag
"f39-build-side-64368", and rebuild dependent packages (with the help of
@smani):
* gd-0:2.3.3-9.fc37.x86_64
* pngquant-0:2.17.0-2.fc37.x86_64
* python3-pillow-0:9.2.0-2.fc37.x86_64
* tuxpaint-1:0.9.28-4.fc37.x86_64
* vips-
On 03. 03. 23 20:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 18:37 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed in
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f34afe57a9
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a61dbc3c1d
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-
On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 15:56, Ben Cotton wrote:
> The current target release date is the early target date (2023-03-14).
> The Go/No-Go meeting will be Thursday!
>
> Action summary
>
>
> Accepted blockers
> -
>
> 1. distribution — Workstation boot x86_64 image
The current target release date is the early target date (2023-03-14).
The Go/No-Go meeting will be Thursday!
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. distribution — Workstation boot x86_64 image exceeds maximum size — POST
ACTION: gdb maintainers to remove the
I think so , see openssl example :
dnf install openssl1.1-devel openssl-devel
Package openssl-devel-1:3.0.8-1.fc37.x86_64 is already installed.
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package openssl-devel-1:3.0.8-
1.fc37.x86_64
- package openssl1.1-devel-1:1.1.1q-2.fc37.i686 conflicts with open
On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 18:37 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
> I've noticed in
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f34afe57a9
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a61dbc3c1d
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a61dbc3c1d
>
> That the updat
SHORT VERSION
The portmidi library in Fedora is at version 217, which is quite old.
Upstream changed to a new version scheme, currently at 2.0.4, and
dumped some subpackages. To serve the needs of different other
packages, it would be easiest for me (as the portmidi maintainer in
Fedora) and them
Hello,
I've noticed in
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f34afe57a9
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a61dbc3c1d
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a61dbc3c1d
That the update is marked as critpath (which is probably correct because
python3-de
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:58:12PM -0500, Eric Garver wrote:
> PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tcpcrypt/pull-request/1
>
> Bugs:
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159838 (f37)
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095227 (f36)
>
> tl;dr The PR removes firewalld
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.2
Test week is happening from 2023-03-05 to 2023-03-12. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As usual, the
On Fri, Mar 3 2023 at 03:21:33 PM +0100, Florian Weimer
wrote:
Is Valve already maintaining a 32-bit distribution? If not, where
would
their Flatpak get the builds from?
There is already a Steam flatpak based on freedesktop-sdk, which builds
just enough i686 stuff for Steam to work.
A
* Michael Catanzaro:
> If the i686 builds only exist for Steam and Wine, can we say users
> should switch to containerized distributions instead (e.g. flatpak,
> snap, or whatever)?
Is Valve already maintaining a 32-bit distribution? If not, where would
their Flatpak get the builds from?
And I
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:34 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 3 2023 at 12:03:12 PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> > Yes, this whole episode makes me want to kill off i686 builds of
> > everything
> > I maintain, even when its not a leaf package. I only spent time
> > investigatin
On Fri, Mar 3 2023 at 12:03:12 PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
Yes, this whole episode makes me want to kill off i686 builds of
everything
I maintain, even when its not a leaf package. I only spent time
investigating
the root cause in gnutls because I saw valgrind warnings and wanted
to be
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 7:06 AM Geraldo Simião Kutz
wrote:
>
> Testing F38 KDE spin today, I see this:
> Delta RPMs reduced 235.2 MB to 23.8 MB (89.9%)
>
> So, it seems we do still have some cornercases when deltaRPM shows its value.
Not really. That's local dis, but the aggregate burden of regula
On 03/03/2023 13:03, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Yes, this whole episode makes me want to kill off i686 builds of everything
I maintain, even when its not a leaf package.
Me too. It worth the F39 System-Wide proposal: drop all i686 builds that
are not needed by Wine/Steam.
--
Sincerely,
Vita
Testing F38 KDE spin today, I see this:
Delta RPMs reduced 235.2 MB to 23.8 MB (89.9%)
So, it seems we do still have some cornercases when deltaRPM shows its
value.
But, ok, In agree that in most cases it's irrelevant this days.
+1 for dropping deltarpm
geraldosimiao
Em ter., 21 de fev. de 20
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 12:56:27PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
>
> > AFAICT, Fedora either keeps 32-bit time_t, or kills i686 for good.
>
> I agree with this position.
>
> For additional details, here is what I wrote in the other thread
> (regarding defaulting time64):
>
OLD: Fedora-38-20230302.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230303.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
* Daniel P. Berrangé:
> AFAICT, Fedora either keeps 32-bit time_t, or kills i686 for good.
I agree with this position.
For additional details, here is what I wrote in the other thread
(regarding defaulting time64):
| That still needs some per-package work (mainly for scripting languages
| using
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230302.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230303.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 13
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 327
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 37.38 MiB
Size of dropped packages
26 matches
Mail list logo
