On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:24 PM Benson Muite
wrote:
> Would like to unretire Include What You Use
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175012
Taken,
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email
Kenneth Goldman kirjoitti 1.3.2023 klo 22.35:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_
GNU_Hello/
The tutorial says:
Lines which are not needed (e.g. BuildRequires and Requires) can be
commented out with the hash # for now.
However, I believe that this line
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, at 9:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> I think the "Upgrade/compatibility impact" section ought to call out the
> possible risk with config mgmt tools like puppet/ansible, that might be
> managing SSH host keys and their permissions/ownership
So that was done with:
> The
Would like to unretire Include What You Use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175012
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://do
The Fedora Linux 38 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday
9 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will
determine the status of the F38 Beta for the 14 March early target
date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].
[1] https://calendar.fe
Guessing the first sentence should be 38 and not 37 right?
On 3/2/23, Ben Cotton wrote:
> The Fedora Linux 37 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday
> 9 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will
> determine the status of the F38 Beta for the 14 March early target
> d
The Fedora Linux 37 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday
9 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will
determine the status of the F38 Beta for the 14 March early target
date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].
[1] https://calendar.fe
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 03. 23 16:06, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:47 PM Tomas Tomecek
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Fabio, answers inline below.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023
In one week (2023-03-09), or slightly later, I plan to update libbraiding from
1.1 to 1.2 in F39/Rawhide. Upstream says, “Minor changes for compatibility with
newer C++.”
https://github.com/miguelmarco/libbraiding/compare/1.1...1.2
This is not supposed to be an incompatible update, and the .so v
On 2/28/23 05:06, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 02:47:03AM -, Daniel Alley napsal(a):
>> I am not sure whether by "all historical updates" you are only referring to
>> all updates being listed in updateinfo.xml, or all history generally
>> (including old packages).
>
> The latter.
Thanks for picking this up!
When I saw that linphone was orphaned, I wanted to adopt it too,
but when I saw how much work it needed and being a new packager,
I didn't trust myself to be able to do all the work alone.
Let me know if I can help with something :D
Hussein
Am 02.03.23 um 10:13 s
Hi all,
Once upon a time...
One day a fedora packager found libosip2 orphaned and decided it needed some
love and adopted it.
Little did he know the rabbit hole he was about to go down. ;-)
All things lead to linphone and as a result I have adopted:
- libosip2
- libeXosip2
- linphone
An integ
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> True. But is this annoyance bigger than updating dependent packages
> to load headers from a different location? Apparently many (most?)
> packages will need to use the compat headers at least for now, so that
> cost would be pretty high.
This depends mainly on
On 02. 03. 23 16:06, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:47 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
Hi Fabio, answers inline below.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:34 PM Matej Focko wrote:
- linux-system-roles v1.35.1: submitted to F39, F37, F36
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The main reason for i686 continuing to exist at all in Fedora is to
> facilitate running of externally distributed 32-bit apps (for example
> wine/steam related). Those apps are all going to be built with 32-bit
> time_t.
WINE is packaged in Fedora. If Fedora rebuilds e
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:47 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio, answers inline below.
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:34 PM Matej Focko wrote:
>>
>> - linux-system-roles v1.35.1: submitted to F39, F37, F36, but not F38
>> - osbuild-compo
Hi Fabio, answers inline below.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:34 PM Matej Focko wrote:
>
> - linux-system-roles v1.35.1: submitted to F39, F37, F36, but not F38
> - osbuild-composer v75: submitted to F39, F37, F36, but not F38
> - cockpit-compo
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:35:11PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:57:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > If any other Fedora maintainer looks after packages that use GNULIB,
> > then it is quite likely that they also need to add --disable-year2038
> > to their spe
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:35:11PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:57:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > If any other Fedora maintainer looks after packages that use GNULIB,
> > then it is quite likely that they also need to add --disable-year2038
> > to their spe
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:57:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> If any other Fedora maintainer looks after packages that use GNULIB,
> then it is quite likely that they also need to add --disable-year2038
> to their specfiles to avoid i686 brokenness when talking to any
> non-glibc libraries
In one week (2023-03-02), or slightly later, I plan to update the
python-shapely package from 1.8.5.post1 to 2.0.1 in Rawhide/F39 by
merging the linked PR[1].
There are incompatible changes[2], but after some patching and some
waiting for upstream releases, all dependent packages now build
su
OLD: Fedora-38-20230301.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230302.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Dne 02. 03. 23 v 0:50 Jason Tibbitts napsal(a):
I do see that the license tag should probably have an SPDX identifier
"GPL-3.0-or-later" instead of "GPLv3+" but that's somewhat minor.
Fair enough.
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/114
Miroslav
Dne 01. 03. 23 v 23:39 Kenneth Goldman napsal(a):
There's Source, Source0, and sources. What are the definitions?
I think that older RPMs require the numbered version, e.g. `Source0`.
With advent of macros such as `%autosetup`, the number is not as
important as it used to be and therefore
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:06:04AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > It seems as if there is some issue with TLS (is gnutls borked on i686?)
>
> Yes as it happens, see the thread here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/li
Dne 01. 03. 23 v 22:59 Kenneth Goldman napsal(a):
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_
GNU_Hello/
~~~
when running that tutorial (Fedora 37, x86), I get this error:
ERROR: Exception(/home/kgold/hello/hello-2.10-1.fc37.src.rpm)
Config
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It seems as if there is some issue with TLS (is gnutls borked on i686?)
Yes as it happens, see the thread here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-March/145992.html
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group,
On 02/03/2023 08:43, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
TB still uses Xwayland?
By default, yes.
If you install thunderbird-wayland then you will get an
alternative native Wayland version.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
devel maili
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:39 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I have updated my Rawhide yesterday and today I have noticed, that KB
> layout changes do not work in TB. It stubbornly uses English layout. I
> have reported the issue here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174708
>
> and
I have updated my Rawhide yesterday and today I have noticed, that KB
layout changes do not work in TB. It stubbornly uses English layout. I
have reported the issue here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174708
and later tried to downgrade TB to previous version, but that did not h
30 matches
Mail list logo
