I am not sure whether by "all historical updates" you are only referring to all
updates being listed in updateinfo.xml, or all history generally (including old
packages). But in the latter case, note that keeping all updates massively
inflates the storage requirements for maintaining a copy of
Dne 28. 02. 23 v 0:26 Jerry James napsal(a):
So I guess the script only checks the first line of the git commit
message, right?
Right. I thought that checking whole commit message may bring more false
positives.
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- de
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 4:23 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt
>
> say:
>
> gap-pkg-ace warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please
> check
>
> When I check
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gap
Dne 27. 02. 23 v 23:41 Jerry James napsal(a):
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 3:35 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
List by package maintainers is here
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt
That shows some packages under my name, such as gap-pkg-
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 3:35 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> List by package maintainers is here
>
>
> https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt
That shows some packages under my name, such as gap-pkg-ace, where I
pushed git commits mentioning
Two weeks ago we had:
* 23029 spec files in Fedora
* 29405 license tags in all spec files
* 22401 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
* 8795 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
Today we have:
* 23060 spec files in Fedora
* 29449license tags in all spec files
2023-02-23T05:19:37Z Dalton Hubble :
Hey folks,
I'm an engineer working in the Go, cloud, and infrastructure space.
I've been a Linux user for a while, a Fedora user for the last ~8
years, and used to work for CoreOS. I maintain a few open source Go
libraries, maintain a Kubernetes distro,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 07:43:58PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 7:36 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
> > > there's one remai
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 7:36 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
> > there's one remaining issue. The tests stubbornly fail on i686. It
> > seems as if there is s
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
> there's one remaining issue. The tests stubbornly fail on i686. It
> seems as if there is some issue with TLS (is gnutls borked on i686?)
>
> https://koji.fe
I've spent the day fixing various issues in qemu on Rawhide, but
there's one remaining issue. The tests stubbornly fail on i686. It
seems as if there is some issue with TLS (is gnutls borked on i686?)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=98075482
[Ignore the transient aarch64
PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tcpcrypt/pull-request/1
Bugs:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159838 (f37)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095227 (f36)
tl;dr The PR removes firewalld support from the tcpcrypt package. This
integration appears to have never w
Yes.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:51 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 26. 02. 23 v 17:07 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lembe
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 10:20 AM Sandro wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings everyone,
> > >
> > > TL;DR
> > > Will there be AVIF (AV1) support for applications using libheif in
> > > Fedora?
On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 10:20 AM Sandro wrote:
> >
> > Greetings everyone,
> >
> > TL;DR
> > Will there be AVIF (AV1) support for applications using libheif in
> > Fedora?
> >
> > A while ago I stumbled upon AVIF files not being supported b
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 03:03, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 09:52:03PM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
> > On 2023-02-22 02:47, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > V Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:48:26AM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
> > > >
> > > > First, the bug. From these results, it looks li
OLD: Fedora-38-20230226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:110.98 KiB
Size of
Thanks for your advice. I tried and it can be built with no error, but when
installing built contour package, it shows the following error:
```
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libContourTerminalDisplay.so()(64bit) needed by
contour-20230226-1.fc39.x86_64
- nothing pr
Upstream appears to be disabling position independent code for some reason
in the crispy-core library:
https://github.com/contour-terminal/contour/blob/master/src/crispy/CMakeLists.txt#L100
(although they are using no-pie, which is odd since it is a library and I
would have expected no-pic instead,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:51 AM Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:41:37 -0800
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 9:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 07:53:57PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben C
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 27th
February at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC
(Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone
to attend. You can join us over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedoraproject.or
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 10:41:37 -0800
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:40 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners
> > > can indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tr
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 50
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:110.98
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 08:20, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 24/02/2023 09:06, Benson Muite wrote:
> > No. There are incompatibilities. Maybe it is better to keep the old
> > name, and use Catch2v3 as a new name, so packages can update more easily
> > when they are ready to do so?
>
> Fedo
Dne 26. 02. 23 v 17:07 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a):
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys.
V Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 12:08:28PM -0400, Robert Marcano via devel napsal(a):
> On 2/24/23 12:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Robert Marcano via devel
> > said:
> > > Does DNF on RHEL for example do something different when --security
> > > is involved? Because the RHEL documentati
V Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 09:52:03PM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
> On 2023-02-22 02:47, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:48:26AM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
> > >
> > > First, the bug. From these results, it looks like rpminspect is only
> > > comparing the primary package t
28 matches
Mail list logo
