Fedora 37: kernel: general protection fault when use NFS server

There is some work around or solution for this kernel's bug? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150630#c6 All 6.1.x kernel crash my nfs server if I use it from a Debian (OSMC) client. Many thanks -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 37 Workstation)

Review Request: unretire slim

Hi, I have filed a BZ request for unretiring slim. It is at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173236 Can someone please review it? Best! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li

Re: Announced pkgconf soname change

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 5:18 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 6:43 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:02 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:55 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > > > > > pkgconf-1.9.4-1.fc39, comparing to 1.8.0-6.fc39, c

Re: Announced pkgconf soname change

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 6:43 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:02 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:55 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > > > pkgconf-1.9.4-1.fc39, comparing to 1.8.0-6.fc39, changed a soname without > > > a notice on this list. Affected packages:

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2023-02-21 12:48, Matthew Miller wrote: I was asked to weigh in onhttps://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JYKVELSBJQMEK6KEFXG354ZDZDDX

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Fri, Feb 24 2023 at 11:42:17 AM -0400, Robert Marcano via devel wrote: Does DNF on RHEL for example do something different when --security is involved? Because the RHEL documentation talks about it as a feature to use. Is a lack of metadata for previous updates the problem or the implementa

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 06:03:39AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'm not sure what a solution could be. Keep every update in updateinfo > > so dnf could tell you that there's 2 updates and 1 is security and the > > other bugfix? but then we would need to also keep th

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 05:56:01AM -, Daniel Alley wrote: > Are you saying that DNF does an exact version match instead of making the > assumption that packages with version >= X contain a fix for a security bug > which the updateinfo declares to be fixed in X? > Or that the updateinfo itself

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Wednesday, February 22, 2023, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 06:18:23AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 3:48 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > > > > I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a > > > priority. Last time we talked about

Re: libindi upgrade to 2.0.0 and soname bump

> Il 04/02/23 18:41, Mattia Verga ha scritto: > So, I've built libindi 2.0.0 under f39-build-side-63222. > > I'm building indi-3rdparty-libraries and indi-3rdparty-drivers 2.0.0 now > and I'll take care of building phd2 from the latest git snapshot which > was fixed to be compatible with libindi 2

Re: Changes to Bugzilla API key requirements

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 05:55:55AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Ah right, I had forgotten about that issue. I do not think I will ever > understand the fascination some projects have for JIRA. It is proprietary, > and IMHO the web UI for users to report bugs in JIRA is very confusing at

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2/24/23 12:35 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 2023-02-24 07:42, Robert Marcano via devel wrote: Does DNF on RHEL for example do something different when --security is involved? Because the RHEL documentation talks about it as a feature to use. Is a lack of metadata for previous updates the prob

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2023-02-24 07:42, Robert Marcano via devel wrote: Does DNF on RHEL for example do something different when --security is involved? Because the RHEL documentation talks about it as a feature to use. Is a lack of metadata for previous updates the problem or the implementation? I don't have

livcd-creator gives incorrect checksum for recently rebuilt local repo packages

Hello, I was using livecd-creator, and I get the following for local recently rebuilt packages, but not for those built a few weeks ago. Specifically, I get:  Package "wbar-2.3.4-2.fc37.x86_64" from local repository "MyBaseRepo" has incorrect checksum  Error creating Live CD : Unable to insta

RE: TSS maintainer volunteer

> -Original Message- > From: Peter Robinson > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 4:20 AM > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSS maintainer volunteer > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:04 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > V Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:29:07PM +0

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

Mostly upgrades, here are the other results. Installing weak dependencies: ipp-usb x86_640.9.23-2.fc38 fedora 2.1 M passt x86_640^20230216.g4663ccc-1.fc38

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2/24/23 12:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Robert Marcano via devel said: Does DNF on RHEL for example do something different when --security is involved? Because the RHEL documentation talks about it as a feature to use. Is a lack of metadata for previous updates the problem or

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

Once upon a time, Robert Marcano via devel said: > Does DNF on RHEL for example do something different when --security > is involved? Because the RHEL documentation talks about it as a > feature to use. Is a lack of metadata for previous updates the > problem or the implementation? Just a guess,

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2/23/23 8:24 PM, Dennis Gilmore via devel wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 2:48 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a priority. Last time we talked abou

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2/23/23 8:04 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, Feb 24 2023 at 12:00:40 AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: There are also other dangers with installing only security fixes. If a bugfix is released and packaged, and later it's discovered that the bug had security implications, then no security

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230224.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-38-20230223.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230224.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 56 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 6:22 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 24/02/2023 09:42, Tom Hughes wrote: > > Did you miss the bit where I said you needed to change > > your BR to catch2-devel unless upstream has v3 support? > > I want to fix them correctly, i.e. port to catch v3 and send a PR to

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 24/02/2023 09:42, Tom Hughes wrote: Did you miss the bit where I said you needed to change your BR to catch2-devel unless upstream has v3 support? I want to fix them correctly, i.e. port to catch v3 and send a PR to upstream. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: compiling guayadeque on rawhide and f38 - error: ambiguous overload for 'operator!='

did work, many thanks. Regards Martin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: compiling guayadeque on rawhide and f38 - error: ambiguous overload for 'operator!='

Martin Gansser wrote on 2023/02/24 18:23: Hi, when i compile guayadeque-0.4.7 [1] on rawhide and f38 i get the following error messages [2]: /builddir/build/BUILD/guayadeque-0.4.7/src/taginfo/TagInfo.cpp: In member function 'virtual bool Guayadeque::guGStreamerTagInfo::ReadGStreamerTags(const

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

Looks good, with a few downgrades: Downgrading: buildah x86_64 1.29.0-2.fc38 calcium-calculator x86_64 7.9.5-10.fc38 enchant2 x86_64 2.3.3-6.fc38 enchant2-aspell

compiling guayadeque on rawhide and f38 - error: ambiguous overload for 'operator!='

Hi, when i compile guayadeque-0.4.7 [1] on rawhide and f38 i get the following error messages [2]: /builddir/build/BUILD/guayadeque-0.4.7/src/taginfo/TagInfo.cpp: In member function 'virtual bool Guayadeque::guGStreamerTagInfo::ReadGStreamerTags(const wxString&)': /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gs

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 24/02/2023 07:48, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 22/02/2023 12:37, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: I have now added catch2 (for Catch2 v2.x) and upgraded the catch package to Catch2 v3.x in rawhide and f38. All my catch-dependent packages are now failing due to the missing catch.hpp header

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 24/02/2023 09:06, Benson Muite wrote: No. There are incompatibilities. Maybe it is better to keep the old name, and use Catch2v3 as a new name, so packages can update more easily when they are ready to do so? Fedora should go forward. Some packages can be patched trivially: #if (__has_inclu

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 2/24/23 10:48, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 22/02/2023 12:37, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: >> I have now added catch2 (for Catch2 v2.x) and upgraded the catch >> package to Catch2 v3.x in rawhide and f38. > > All my catch-dependent packages are now failing due to the missing > catch.hpp