Hi Fedorians,
I've been working on a repoquerying tool called fedrq [1] that I'd like
to share with you. Here's the elevator pitch: fedrq provides a friendly
interface to query the Fedora repositories. It makes it really easy to
query across Fedora and EPEL branches. It uses the dnf Python binding
Thank you for fixing USD build and taking care of openpgl. I will handle both
blender and luxcorerender.
On 2023-02-11 12:04 p.m., Ben Beasley wrote:
There are API changes in Embree 4 that are likely to require source code
changes in dependent packages.
I’ve patched USD to compile with Embre
On 11-02-2023 20:37, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
I would like to contribute as a maintainer, taking care of an orphaned
package.
Welcome Priscila! Did you have a specific package in mind already? If
not I can offer you Xaos [1].
I recently adopted that package for someone else who wanted to be
On 2023-02-11 12:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:19:30PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 2023-02-11 12:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this tim
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:19:30PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
> On 2023-02-11 12:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > > Hello team,
> > >
> > > I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this time of
> > > writing.
On 2023-02-11 12:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this time of
writing. Does it mean the branching is in process?
No, branching was all completed a while back.
Can y
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:47:26AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this time of
> writing. Does it mean the branching is in process?
No, branching was all completed a while back.
Can you expand on why/what happens/what
There are API changes in Embree 4 that are likely to require source code
changes in dependent packages.
I’ve patched USD to compile with Embree 4[2] and kicked off builds in
the side tags[3][4], which I expect to succeed. Since we’re not
currently able to easily run the tests, it’s hard to be
Hello team,
I am unable to create a f38 branch for f38-backgrounds at this time of
writing. Does it mean the branching is in process?
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 2:38 PM Priscila Gutierres wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> My name is Priscila Gutierres, and I would like to introduce myself.
> I'm not good at this, but as a background, I can tell you that I've been
> working as package owner at Red Hat for 3 months, but I've been there
> for mor
Hello
My name is Priscila Gutierres, and I would like to introduce myself.
I'm not good at this, but as a background, I can tell you that I've been
working as package owner at Red Hat for 3 months, but I've been there
for more than two years.
I'm still learning about rpm packaging, but I would li
On 2023-02-11 07:04, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Please base the f38-background.spec on the f37-background.spec.
Especially the license tag.
According the packaging guidelines the license tag for new packages
should be in SPDX form.
|This has been already changed in f37-backgrounds for some time.|
On 11-02-2023 18:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-37-primary
Error: GPG check FAILED
Perhaps this is a branching issue, I'm F37 now and it appears to be
working, albeit quite slow 😄
Yes, it could be... we need to get new branched/rawhide c
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> 'git pull --rebase' is a strange command to suggest. I does the job,
>> but almost by accident, and it's confusing things by mixing in rebasing.
>> Can we make this just say 'git fetch' or 'git fetch -v' ?
>
> The thing is, you
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 06:42:51AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:13 AM John Reiser wrote:
>
> > On 2/10/23 19:57, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > So I know the s390x builders are down but I have an active BZ for tests
> > failing with s390x so I figured what the heck, maybe do
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler via devel said:
> Ben Cotton wrote:
> > 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image
> > exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED
>
> Let me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been
> asking for data on the size impact an
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 06:44:03PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Fedora Linux 38 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
>> --rebase to pick up the new branch
>
> I know this has been discussed seemingly on every branching since the
Ben Cotton wrote:
> 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image
> exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED
Let me guess, this is from the -fno-omit-frame-pointers Change? I have been
asking for data on the size impact and I have been completely ignored both
by the Change owners
> After several attempts, Blender is finally available for EPEL9 as 3.3
> LTS series. Major differences compared to its Fedora counterpart is the
> minimal dependencies based on blender_lite.cmake[2] thus light version.
> As the result, functions like Cycle Rendering will be unavailable but
> Eevee
On 11. 02. 23 14:02, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
it has so far taken two weeks of waiting to get the long-awaited libQGLViewer
update in Fedora. Since this is a soname bump, per Fedora policy the update will
take another week before it can be built in rawhide; the libQGLViewer maintainer
has now ann
Thank you for the notice.
According to a repoquery:
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo='*source*' --dnf-cmd --
repoquery --whatrequires '*embree*'
the openpgl package should have been included in the list as well. It
looks like openpgl failed to build in the F38 mass rebuild, but
Please base the f38-background.spec on the f37-background.spec.
Especially the license tag.
According the packaging guidelines the license tag for new packages should be
in SPDX form.
|This has been already changed in f37-backgrounds for some time.|
|https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/f37-backgr
On 1/31/23 14:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers.
>
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
>
> 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
> approxima
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:13 AM John Reiser wrote:
> On 2/10/23 19:57, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > So I know the s390x builders are down but I have an active BZ for tests
> failing with s390x so I figured what the heck, maybe doing a local
> mocbuild attempt using qemu could help here like it did wi
On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 09:37:08 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > Affected Services:
> >
> > s390x koji builders. Jobs will queue up, but not be processed until
> > the builders are back online. Maintainers are urged to just avoi
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Affected Services:
>
> s390x koji builders. Jobs will queue up, but not be processed until
> the builders are back online. Maintainers are urged to just avoid
> submitting builds just before and during this outage.
Do we need to ca
> Posted the rpmfusion bug here:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6573
Try learning to wait patiently, branching isn't a simple process.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@
"Comment # 3 on bug 6573 from leigh scott
You will need to wait until we complete branching, the next package push on
Monday will fix the release issue."
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
28 matches
Mail list logo
