Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-02-07/fesco.2023-02-07-17.04.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-02-07/fesco.2023-02-07-17.04.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-02-07/fesco.2023-02-07-17.04.log.html
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 6:50 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 06. 02. 23 v 1:13 Georg Sauthoff napsal(a):
> > Judging from the FTBFS mail/Bugzilla/
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/datamash it
> > looks like jhladky (Jiri Hladky) currently is the sole maintainer?
>
> You are looking at the right pl
Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
> released Fedora versions, and not just the upcoming ones.
In gen
On 2/7/23 8:28 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
I've got a few useful Nagios monitoring plugins I'd like to add to
Fedora/EPEL. I'm rather unimaginative at naming, so the Github repo for
them is "nagios-plugins-cmadams"... while I wouldn't mind having a
package with my username in it in Fedora, it seems a
I've got a few useful Nagios monitoring plugins I'd like to add to
Fedora/EPEL. I'm rather unimaginative at naming, so the Github repo for
them is "nagios-plugins-cmadams"... while I wouldn't mind having a
package with my username in it in Fedora, it seems a little vain. :)
Before I go making a p
In one week, 2023-02-14, or slightly later, I plan to update pre-commit[1] from
2.21.0 to 3.0.4 in F38/Branched and F39/Rawhide.
Dependent packages are python-ipykernel, python-jupyter-kernel-test,
python-nbconvert, python-opytimark, and python-pyscaffold. COPR testing[2] did
not reveal any inc
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel
wrote:
>
> People,
>
> Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for
> Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . .
>
As I recall, in the beginning, Tenacity (to perform
most meaningful opera
On 2/7/23 1:25 PM, Philip Rhoades via devel wrote:
People,
Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for
Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . .
Thanks,
Phil.
I have a copr[0]. It has some issues and the current version is old. I
have
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 21:03 +, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tenacity ?
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tenacity ?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-
People,
Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for
Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . .
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box 896
Cowra NSW 2794
Australia
E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au
_
2023-02-07T11:43:53Z Lokesh Mandvekar :
> We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
> released Fedora versions, and not just the upcom
Hi,
After this change missed F37, it's now testable in F38:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/pull-request/100
systemd-253~rc2-3.fc38
Thanks Dusty, zbyszek!
Thomas
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Hi everyone,
it came to Infra & Releng Team (sub-team in CPE that is taking care of
Fedora Infra, Fedora Release Engineering and CentOS Infra) attention
that there is a confusion about the labels we are using for issues in
our trackers. Namely fedora-infrastructure, releng and centos-infra.
T
On 23. 01. 23 17:44, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly.
Is there an estimated date when this will happen?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:12 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 07:38, Dan Čermák
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lokesh,
>>
>> Lokesh Mandvekar writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
>> > and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and s
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:56 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > There are still active users of Fedora IoT 36 on armhfp using
> > containers so I suspect they may be unhappy of they go away before the
> > F-36 EOL in the late May/early June t
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 07:38, Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Hi Lokesh,
>
> Lokesh Mandvekar writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> > and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> > https://github.com/containers org. We would like
Hi Lokesh,
Lokesh Mandvekar writes:
> Hi,
>
> We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
> released Fedora versions, and not just the
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:56 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> There are still active users of Fedora IoT 36 on armhfp using
> containers so I suspect they may be unhappy of they go away before the
> F-36 EOL in the late May/early June timeframe.
I see. I guess we could leave armhfp be until then. Btw,
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 11:43 AM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
> and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
> https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
> released Fedora versio
Hi,
We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686
and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under
https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for
released Fedora versions, and not just the upcoming ones.
What Fedora paperwork do we need
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230206.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230207.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 168
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 404.92 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-02-07 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be di
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:13:24PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> Can we update rawhide(ubdsrv) with upstream commit
> 58401cf5614ec3ab2a69166e7f9b596f862de105?
>
> https://github.com/ming1/ubdsrv/commit/58401cf5614ec3ab2a69166e7f9b596f862de105
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/ta
Hello Richard,
Can we update rawhide(ubdsrv) with upstream commit
58401cf5614ec3ab2a69166e7f9b596f862de105?
https://github.com/ming1/ubdsrv/commit/58401cf5614ec3ab2a69166e7f9b596f862de105
Thanks,
Ming
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec
26 matches
Mail list logo
